In April 1968, a group of individuals from ten countries, scientists, educators, economists, humanists, industrialists, and national and international civil servants- gathered in the Accademia dei Lincei in Rome. Out of this meeting grew the Club of Rome, an informal organization that has been described as an “invisible college.” Its purposes are to foster understanding of the varied but interdependent components-economic, political, natural, and social-that make up the global system in which we all live, to bring that new understanding to the attention of policy-makers and the public worldwide, and in this way to promote new policy initiatives and action. A series of early meetings of the Club of Rome culminated in the decision to initiate a remarkably ambitious undertaking the Project on the Predicament of Mankind. The intent of the project is to examine the complex of problems troubling men of all nations: poverty in the midst of plenty, degradation of the environment, loss of faith in institutions, uncontrolled urban spread, insecurity of employment, alienation of youth, rejection of traditional values and inflation and other monetary and economic disruptions. Team examined five key factors that determine, and therefore, ultimately limit, growth on this planet-population, agricultural production, natural resources, industrial production, and pollution. Nineteen years later, in Brundtland report 1987, a new term occur and very soon become dominant in the world. For 20 years, that orthodox slogan was Sustainable Development, this meant (Brundtland report, 1987) economic and environmentally sustainable growth. However, the industrial economy depletes resources and overloads the sinks. Hubbert’s peak oil is approaching. Carbon dioxide concentration in the atmosphere increasing 2 pm per year. Current environmental degradation and resource depletion challenge our societies in their fundaments. Scientific evidence shows that the negative impacts of our economies are growing, while wellbeing doesn’t seem to follow this trend” (OECD 2011). This paper touches green growth ideas, and provides the resources and environmental services on which our well-being relies, and green economy as one that results in improved human well-being and social equity, while significantly reducing environmental risks and ecological scarcities. We will come to the term of de-growth, which is strongly different from the usual mainstream economic theorizing. According to the thinkers of this line of economic thought, growth is not necessarily desirable. Moreover, in many cases, it is specifically harmful and the cause of our ecological and social problems. The theory of de-growth suggests localizing production and consumption as much as possible, so in this way, these can be one of the keys to start the transition. One of my research questions is what are the characteristics of sustainable de-growth consumption, and how can the different kind of local food movements serve the goals of de-growth from the aspect of consumers. Degrowth theories are in the transitional period to reach global sustainability - tries to solve the ecological and social crisis through a shift in our socio-economic paradigm. In all societies, the agricultural world can be seen as the most important sector of production. We are not completely reinstituting Physiocrats’ view, but agriculture is well presented as the foundation of the activities, due to many implications in others sectors. Our way to be a farmer can determine the quality of soils, water and food. Health is strongly related to what we eat. The global crisis occurring in the farmer world, plenty of farms disappear every year around the world, and is not a detail. Optimistically, many considerations are dedicated to tomorrow agriculture: it should be free from petrol use (as inputs and energy), extensive, local and environmentally sound. Farmers have to live directly from what they produce, but this sector should be away from global profit focus. We can see it as a public service, providing many implications in other sectors and forcing them into the transitional period. Another application of the precautionary principle is the upholding of GMO on laboratories. This kind of seeds is directly linked with an intensive, centralized and profit-oriented agriculture. In agro ecological accounts, by contrast, agricultural methods incorporate and enhance of natural resources, as a basis for them to gain from the value that they add. Agriculture stands as the foundation of modern human societies. Any changes in social functioning should thoroughly consider how to guarantee people a proper supply of food, in terms of both quantity and quality. Degrowth represents a movement that aims at achieving a radical change in the societal metabolism of societies, toward a more frugal, sustainable and convivial lifestyle. The movement envisages a society where concepts as sharing, conviviality, care, commons, justice could stand at its foundation and replace the call for economic growth, which is, obviously, biophysically unsustainable. This paper aims to (1) review how agriculture has been addressed within the degrowth discourse (2) analyse the relationship between agriculture and societal metabolism and its relevance from a degrowth perspective. The paper points out that although many relevant socioeconomic, political and environmental issues have been addressed by degrowth scholars, agriculture is still poorly analysed. This paper will consider some distinguishing characteristics of these degrowth economics aspects, with special on agriculture, with thoughts on some of what will be required to redress this balance. It will conclude with an image of a healthier relationship between humanity and our natural environment – a relationship that will inevitably come about, whether we choose to move into it positively or are forced into it by breakdowns in all of our economies resulting from inevitable and social disasters. But in general this paper wants to connect degrowth idea with agriculture and to give us overview of development of this idea in field of agriculture. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]