5 results
Search Results
2. The Berlin Wall on the Therapist's Couch.
- Author
-
Leuenberger, Christine
- Subjects
- *
PHENOMENOLOGICAL sociology , *PHILOSOPHY , *SOCIAL sciences , *PSYCHOTHERAPISTS , *INTERACTION (Philosophy) , *SOCIALISM - Abstract
This paper falls under the rubric of the sociology of knowledge, which bridges the gap between phenomenological philosophy and the human sciences (Berger et al., 1969). It presents an empirical investigation of the communicative construction of psychotherapeutic reality. I examine therapeutic talk and psychotherapists' reconstructions of the transition from state socialism in Germany in 1989. In both instances I show how psychotherapists' commonly shared interpretative conventions and rules of reasoning produce typical accounts. The first part of the paper shows how certain interpretative conventions and rules of reasoning organize therapeutic talk and interaction in general. The second part focuses on how the interpretative conventions typical of therapy also inform psychotherapists' interpretations of the transition from state socialism. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2000
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. MODELING RELATIONS.
- Author
-
Leo, Joop
- Subjects
- *
RELATION (Philosophy) , *PLACE (Philosophy) , *INTERACTION (Philosophy) , *SPACE perception , *LOGIC , *METAPHYSICS - Abstract
In the ordinary way of representing relations, the order of the relata plays a structural role, but in the states themselves such an order often does not seem to be intrinsically present. An alternative way to represent relations makes use of positions for the arguments. This is no problem for the love relation, but for relations like the adjacency relation and cyclic relations, different assignments of objects to the positions can give exactly the same states. This is a puzzling situation. The question is what is the internal structure of relations? Is the use of positions still justified, and if so, what is their ontological status? In this paper mathematical models for relations are developed that provide more insight into the structure of relations “out there” in the real world. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2008
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. The depths and shallows of psychological externalism.
- Author
-
Sneddon, Andrew
- Subjects
- *
EXTERNALISM (Philosophy of mind) , *INTERPERSONAL communication , *INTERACTION (Philosophy) , *INDIVIDUALISM , *PHILOSOPHY , *ETHICS - Abstract
This paper examines extant ways of classifying varieties of psychological externalism and argues that they imply a hitherto unrecognized distinction between shallow and deep externalism. The difference is between starting points: shallowly externalist hypotheses begin with the attribution of psychological states to individuals, just as individualistic hypotheses do, whereas deeply externalistic hypotheses begin with agent-environment interaction as the basis of cognitive processes and attribute psychological states to individuals as necessary for such interaction. The over-arching aim is to show how deep externalism works and what its implications are for psychological and philosophical theorizing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2008
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. Abductive Reasoning, Interpretation and Collaborative Processes.
- Author
-
Arrighi, Claudia and Ferrario, Roberta
- Subjects
- *
ABDUCTION (Logic) , *INTERACTION (Philosophy) , *COMMUNICATION & psychology , *PHILOSOPHY , *CONVERSATION , *CONVERSATIONAL constraint theory (Communication) - Abstract
In this paper we want to examine how the mutual understanding of speakers is reached during a conversation through collaborative processes, and what role is played by abductive inference (in the Peircean sense) in these processes. We do this by bringing together contributions coming from a variety of disciplines, such as logic, philosophy of language and psychology. When speakers are engaged in a conversation, they refer to a supposed common ground: every participant ascribes to the others some knowledge, belief, opinion etc. on which to rely in order to reach mutual understanding. As the conversation unfolds, this common ground is continually corrected and reshaped by the interchanges. An abductive reasoning takes place, in a collaborative setting, in order to build new possible theories about the common ground. In reconstructing this process through the use of a working example, we argue that the integration of a collaborative perspective within the Peircean theory of abduction can help to solve some of the drawbacks that the critics of the latter have outlined, for example its permissivity and non generativity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2008
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.