1. Het rechterlijk bevel en verbod als remedie
- Author
-
Helm, J.J. van der, Krans, H.B., Wissink, M.H., Castermans, A.G., Groot, G. de, Rijssen, G. van, Vriesendorp, R.D., and Leiden University
- Subjects
Deterrent effect ,Judicial freedom ,Collective actions ,Complaint ,Injunction ,Public interest litigation - Abstract
This dissertation discusses the injunction and whether there is a claim for a preventive remedy. It explains how the injunction is regulated in Dutch law, when it can be pronounced and what the grounds for refusal are.Using supranational law, the requirements that a remedy must meet to be effective are examined. It concludes that a remedy is effective if it can enforce substantive rights, can be deployed in a timely manner, has a deterrent function and is proportionate.Three themes are then used to examine whether the national regime is in line with those requirements. In that regard, the role and freedom of the courts, the situation where performance has become impossible, and collective actions against the government are examined.The conclusion is that the national regulation is adequate.
- Published
- 2023