Search

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY Irreparable rotator cuff tear continues to be a point of discussion. Several surgical techniques have been proposed so far. None of them, however, can be considered the method of choice. This study presents the first clinical results of superior capsule reconstruction (SCR) using the DX Reinforcement Matrix. MATERIAL AND METHODS The evaluation included patients with the minimum follow-up of 6 months. The follow-up period in these patients was 1 year (6-18 months) on average. The active (AROM) and passive (PROM) ranges of motion were assessed-anterior flexion, abduction, external rotation and external rotation at 90° abduction. The patients were assessed using clinical scores before and after the surgery-pain assessment scale (VAS), UCLA (University of California at Los Angeles) Shoulder Rating Scale and ASES (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons) Shoulder Score. RESULTS In the period from October 2016 to October 2018, a total of 20 SCRs were performed. The mean age of patients was 61 years. Nine patients were clinically assessed, with the mean follow-up of 1 year. The mean UCLA Shoulder Score was 10 points preoperatively. Postoperatively, the values went up to 29 points on average. The reported ASES score was 23.8 points preoperatively. Postoperatively, the mean score was 73.2 points. The VAS subjective pain score ranged around 7 points before the surgery. After the surgery, the mean VAS score was 2 points. The mean active shoulder flexion was 74° preoperatively and 161° postoperatively. The mean active abduction was 74° preoperatively and 161° postoperatively. The mean active external rotation of the shoulder joint was 20° preoperatively and 56° postoperatively. The mean active external rotation at 90° abduction was 21° preoperatively and 82° postoperatively. The changes in all the followed-up mean parameters of UCLA, ASES, VAS, AROM and PROM reported by our group show a relatively high level of substantive significance. DISCUSSION Results of arthroscopic superior capsule reconstruction using the DX Reinforcement Matrix have not been published in literature so far. Compared to the results for fascia lata published in literature, our results are slightly worse. By contrast, our results are similar to those achieved by human dermal allograft. CONCLUSIONS Arthroscopic superior capsule reconstruction currently appears to be the method of choice in unreconstructed supraspinatus and infraspinatus tear. Our group of patients shows that early clinical outcomes of SCR using xenograft are very promising. A significant pain relief and a considerable improvement in the range of motion of the operated shoulder joint were observed. No complication specifically associated with the use of xenograft has been reported as yet. A longer follow-up period and assessment of a larger group of patients will be necessary to confirm the success of this surgical procedure. Key words: massive rotator cuff tears; irreparable rotator cuff tears; superior capsular reconstruction; xenograft; DX Reinforcement Matrix.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY To evaluate the results of arthroscopic capsular release for the treatment of severe frozen shoulder syndrome. MATERIAL Between 2006 and 2008, 27 patients with severe frozen shoulder syndrome were treated by arthroscopic capsular release. The average age of the patients was 54 years (range, 34 to 75), 15 were men and 12 were women. The right shoulder was operated on more frequently (16 patients). The average pre-operative flexion was 73 degrees (range, 10 degrees to 150 degrees ) and pre-operative abduction was 56 degrees (10 degrees to 140 degrees ). The average Constant score was 35 points. METHODS With the patient in a lateral recumbent position, arthroscopic release of the joint capsule is performed with the Mitek VAPR 3 radiofrequency system, using a hook or an LPS electrode. The rotator interval, coracohumeral ligament, superior and middle glenohumeral ligaments and anterior part of the inferior glenohumeral ligament are gradually released, as well as the anterior glenohumeral joint capsule along its full width at the anterior rim of the labrum.To avoid damage to the axillary nerve, the axillary part of the joint capsule is released along the edge of the glenoid cavity. When internal rotation in abduction still remains restricted, release is extended to the posterior glenohumeral joint capsule.The procedure also involves exploration of the subacromial space and, if necessary, subacromial bursectomy or acromioplasty. Subsequently, the range of motion after release is tested and, when necessary, the remaining fibres of the joint capsule are disintegrated by careful manipulation (redress). The surgery is followed by analgesic and rehabilitation therapy. RESULTS All treated patients reported an improved range of motion. The average post-operative flexion and abduction extended to 160 degrees and 155 degrees, respectively, and 23 patients gained the motion range necessary for normal shoulder function.The average Constant score was 80.3 points and the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) score was 28.6 points. When using the school marking system, the average result evaluation was 1.75. All patients were satisfied with the outcome and were willing to undergo surgery on the other side if need be. No complications were recorded. DISCUSSION Therapy for frozen shoulder can be conservative or surgical. Most of the cases can be managed by correct conservative treatment. In accordance with the current literature data, we are using arthroscopic capsular release in resistant cases. This technique allows us to release contracted structures without the risk of iatrogenic injury and offers possibilities for the treatment of co-existing lesions. In the majority of patients this procedure can remedy their complaints, although the affected shoulder joint rarely remains asymptomatic. The aim of this approach is to accelerate the treatment of this disability; the long-term results are similar to those of conservative therapy. CONCLUSIONS Arthroscopic capsular release is the method of choice for the treatment of frozen shoulder syndrome in patients who have failed to respond to conservative therapy. It provides marked improvement in the range of motion and is associated with a minimum of post-operative complications. However, some patients may complain of persisting discomfort in the joint treated. Key words: frozen shoulder, arthroscopy, capsular release.