1. The reporting quality of abstracts of randomized controlled trials on wrinkles
- Author
-
Bogić, Jure, Bukić, Josipa, Rušić, Doris, and Šešelja Perišin, Ana
- Subjects
skin ,photoaging ,koža ,starenje kože ,randomized controlled trial ,randomizirano kontrolirano istraživanje ,wrinkles ,bore ,BIOMEDICINA I ZDRAVSTVO. Farmacija. Farmacija ,skin aging ,fotostarenje ,BIOMEDICINE AND HEALTHCARE. Pharmacy. Pharmacy - Abstract
Cilj: Cilj ovog istraživanja je utvrditi kvalitetu sažetaka randomiziranih kontroliranih kliničkih istraživanja koja ispituju učinkovitost proizvoda u terapiji bora. Materijal i metode: Obavljena je PubMed pretraga svih randomiziranih kontroliranih kliničkih istraživanja na temu bora objavljenih između 2017. i 2022. godine. Sažetci su pretraživani koristeći ključnu riječ „wrinkles“, a uključeni su svi kojima je bio dostupan sažetak te su bili na engleskom jeziku. Pretraživanje je obavljeno u kolovozu 2022. Kako bi se ocijenila kvaliteta sažetaka uključenih ispitivanja korišten je CONSORT alat koji sadrži sedamnaest stavki. Rezultati: Pubmed pretraga rezultirala je sa 350 sažetaka randomiziranih kontroliranih kliničkih istraživanja, od kojih je izuzeto 58. Medijan ukupnog zbroja svih stavki CONSORT liste bio je 7 ( interval pouzdanosti 6-7) za ukupni promatrani period. Najveća zabilježena vrijednost bila je 12 od ukupno 17 stavki koje bi prema CONSORT-u sažetak trebao sadržavati. Ni jedan sažetak nije imao svih 17 stavki navedenih u sažetku te podatke o financiranju istraživanja. Najmanje su dostupne informacije o financiranju, randomizaciji i podaci o ispitanicima. Zaključak: Kvaliteta sažetaka randomiziranih kontroliranih kliničkih istraživanja o terapiji bora je niska., Objectives: To analyze the quality of abstracts of randomized controlled trials on wrinkles available on PubMed using the CONSORT checklist. Material and methods: A PubMed search of all randomized controlled clinical trials on wrinkles published between 2017 and 2022 was performed. Abstracts were searched using the term „wrinkles“. Criteria of inclusion was available abstract and English language. The search was performed in August 2022. In order to evaluate the quality of the abstracts of the included trials, the CONSORT checklist containing seventeen items was used. Results: A PubMed search resulted in 350 abstracts of randomized controlled clinical trails, of which 58 were excluded. The median of the total sum of items from the CONSORT checklist was 7 ( confidence interval 6-7) for the entire observed period. The highest recorded value was 12 items out of a total of 17 that, according to CONSORT checklist, an abstract should contain. Not a single abstract had all of the 17 items listed in the abstract and data on the research funding. The least available information is about research funding, randomization and data on research participants. Conclusion: The quality of abstracts of randomized controlled trials on wrinkles is low.
- Published
- 2022