Search

Copyright of Acta Edulis Fungi is the property of Acta Edulis Fungi and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Agricultural Outlook (1673-3908) is the property of Institute of Agricultural Information, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Agricultural Outlook (1673-3908) is the property of Institute of Agricultural Information, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis is the property of Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis Editorial Office and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Journal of Agricultural Big Data is the property of Journal of Agricultural Big Data Editorial Office and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

This study uses SPSS software to perform correlation analysis and regression analysis on real estate market prices and their influencing factors between 2012 and 2017 in Harbin, China. According to the research results, the prices of both different types of real estate and the overall real estate market in Harbin are predominantly affected by demand factors; however, the dominance of each factor differs by market type. That is, the prices of residential and all real estate markets are predominantly affected by the per capita disposable income of urban residents, the market price of office real estate is predominantly affected by the sales area of this type of real estate, and the market price of other types of real estate is predominantly affected by the area of this type of real estate for sale. Moreover, the regression model is similar for the market price of residential real estate and all real estate, whereas the market price regression models of other types of real estate exhibit significant differences. Therefore, the results of this study indicate that the factors affecting the price of housing and the overall real estate market can be appropriately replaced on the basis of verification; however, the fuzzy research methods applied in previous related research still have certain limitations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Taiwan Financial & Economic Law Review is the property of Charitable Trust Fund for Taiwan Finance, Enterprise & Banking Law and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences is the property of Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences Editorial Department and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The object of copyright is a kind of quasipublic goods which is non-excludable and non-rival in consumption. For the purpose of making the best use of everything, qualified people and organizations are entitled to obtain statutory licenses to retransmit owners' works or distribute copies under the conditions specified by the law. The statutory licensing system in the American law is based on three principles: anti-monopolism, fair market price in negotiated terms, and maximizing the availability of creative works to the public. It affords the copyright owners fair protection to make owners' identification clear, obtain licensing fee distribution, and prohibit willful altering of the content of particular works or any commercial advertising or station announcement transmitted by the primary transmitter during, or immediately before or after, the transmission of such program. It endows copyright users with the right of secondary transmission and fair incomes under the existing economic conditions. Both sides have the obligation to cooperate with each other for their exertion of right and acquisition of evidence in substantial law and procedural law. Neglect violation is actionable as acts of infringement and fully subject to remedies provided by the law. Notwithstanding any provision of the antitrust laws, in negotiating statutory licenses in accordance with copyright law, any copyright owners and users may negotiate and agree upon the royalty rates and license terms and conditions for the performance. In the absence of negotiated license agreement, and upon the filing of a petition, a copyright arbitration royalty panel is to determine and establish such rates and terms, considering these for comparable types of performance and circumstances under the voluntary license negotiated under market conditions. Any decision of the agency should be under judicial reviews when it is appealed by aggrieved party who would be bound by it. In the absence of the systematization of statutory licensing proceedings in the American law, China has much to do to absorb all the forenamed theories and practices. Acquiescence licensing is characteristic of the Chinese system and shows its strongpoints, which may be reserved under particular conditions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]