Search

Network Meta-analysis and multi-criteria decision analysis(MCDA) model were performed to evaluate the benefit-risk of Compound Cantharis Capsules, Huisheng Oral Solution, and Jinlong Capsules in the adjuvant treatment of primary liver cancer(PLC). The randomized controlled trial(RCT) of Compound Cantharis Capsules, Huisheng Oral Solution, and Jinlong Capsules in treating PLC were retrieved from CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, Web of Science, PubMed, and Cochrane Library. R 4.2 was employed to conduct a network Meta-analysis, on the basis of which the effect values of the three medicines were obtained by indirect comparison. MCDA was performed to establish the value tree based on the benefit-risk indexes. Hiview 3.2 was used to calculate the benefit values, risk values, and benefit-risk values of the three medicines in treating PLC, and a sensitivity analysis was carried out to evaluate the robustness of the results. Oracle Crystal Ball 11.1 was employed to optimize the evaluation results by Monte Carlo simulation. A total of 39 RCTs were included. The results showed that Compound Cantharis Capsules, Huisheng Oral Solution, and Jinlong Capsules combined with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization(TACE) had the benefit values of 45, 51 and 45, the risk values of 59, 47, and 41, and the benefit-risk values of 52, 49, and 43, respectively. The benefit-risk differences and [95%CI] of Compound Cantharis Capsules vs Huisheng Oral Solution, Compound Cantharis Capsules vs Jinlong Capsules, and Huisheng Oral Solution vs Jinlong Capsules were 3.00[-13.09, 21.82], 9.00[-4.39, 24.62], and 6.00[-8.84, 20.28], respectively. Based on the results of MCDA, Huisheng Oral Solution, Jinlong Capsules, and Compound Cantharis Capsules combined with TACE had the greatest benefit, the greatest risk, and the best overall benefit, respectively. Considering the efficacy and safety, the priority of the three oral Chinese patent medicines combined with TACE for treating PLC followed the trend of Compound Cantharis Capsules, Huisheng Oral Solution, and Jinlong Capsules.

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has the characteristics of long course of disease and difficulty in treatment. The conventional therapy may easily induce adverse drug reactions or events (ADR/ADE) due to the long-time medication. Thus, it should be given special attentions to treatment benefit and medication risk of RA patients. Aconitum, a kind of toxic traditional Chinese herbs, is an important complement therapy for RA, with some controversy in clinical application. Coming straight to the practical problem of combined use of traditional Chinese medicines (TCM) and Western medicines (WM), this study conducted quantitative assessment on the benefits and risks of Aconitum using combined with WM or not, which was carried out by the method of multi-criteria decision analysis model. RevMan 5.2 software was used to separately analyze the results of every index of 21 random clinical trials (RCTs) of Aconitum exclusive use in the treatment of RA, and 49 RCTs of Aconitum combined use with WM. The merged results indicated that as compared with the conventional therapy of WM, no matter the exclusive use or the combined use of Aconitum could improve the efficacy and decrease the incidence of ADR/ADEs. Based on the benefit-risk assessment decision tree of RA treatment, Hiview 3 software and Crystal Ball Monte Carlo simulation were used to calculate the benefit value, risk value and benefit-risk value of Aconitum exclusive use and the combined use of Aconitum with WM. The results showed that the combination therapy had significantly better benefits than Aconitum exclusive using, difference value was 15, (95%CI[9.72, 20.25]), but the risk of combined use was higher difference value=23, （95%CI[15.57, 30.55]）. In comprehensive consideration of the benefit and risk, the total benefit-risk value of using Aconitum alone was 58, while that of the combination therapy was 55, and the probability of the former superior to the latter was 81.07%. The study showed that Aconitum was the important therapy to supply RA treatment. In clinical application, the patient's acceptability of benefit and risk need to be considered; if patients cannot bear the risk, the combination use of Aconitum and WM is not recommended., Competing Interests: The authors of this article and the planning committee members and staff have no relevant financial relationships with commercial interests to disclose., (Copyright© by the Chinese Pharmaceutical Association.)