Search

Objective: To compare the clinical efficacy of robotic and laparoscopic radical surgery in the treatment of middle-low rectal cancers., Methods: From January 2015 to March 2016, intra-operative and postoperative follow-up data of 30 patients with middle-low rectal cancers who underwent robotic radical resection(robot group) and 32 patients with middle-low rectal cancers who underwent laparoscopic radical resection (laparoscopy group)n in our department were retrospectively collected. The distance from cancer to anal margin was less than 10 cm in both two groups and advanced rectal cancers were confirmed by preoperative colonoscopy biopsy. Associated data were compared between two groups., Results: There were 13 males and 17 females in robot group with age of 27 to 85 (mean 59.7) years, disease course of 3 to 12 (mean 6.2) months and clinical stage T2-3N0-1. There were 16 males and 16 females in laparoscopic group with age of 32 to 79 (mean 60.3) years, disease course of 2 to 10(mean 5.9) months and clinical stage T2-3N0-1. The baseline data of two groups were not significantly different (all P>0.05). All the patients in two groups completed operations successfully without conversion to open operation. Compared with laparoscopic group, the blood loss was less [(100.3±43.7) ml vs. (150.3±68.2) ml, t=3.413, P=0.001], the first flatus time [(49.3±12.4) h vs. (58.6±12.5) h, t=2.838, P=0.006] and urinary catheter removal time [(3.0±0.7) d vs. (4.8±0.9) d, t=5.491, P=0.000] were shorter, while the operation time [(217.3±57.8) min vs. (187.9±23.1) min, t=2.772, P=0.009] was longer in robot group. No cancer tissue was observed in resection margin of two groups. Number of harvested lymph node per case (15.2±7.4 vs. 13.9±4.9, t=-0.764, P=0.448), distance from anal margin to tumor distal edge [(7±3) cm vs. (6.5±3) cm, t=-1.952, P=0.056] and postoperative hospital stay [(13.6±1.3) d vs. (13.8±1.8) d, t=0.925, P=0.359] were not significantly different between two groups. No serious complications occurred in two groups during intra-operative and postoperative period. During following up of 3 to 12 (average 8.7) months, 1 case of anastomotic fistula occurred in each group and was cured by conservative treatment without significant difference [3.3%(1/30) vs. 3.1%(1/32), P=1.000]. No sexual dysfunction was found in either groups. Two cases in laparoscopic group presented relapse and metastasis, but no recurrence and metastasis was observed in robot group. There was no death in two groups., Conclusion: Robotic radical surgery in the treatment of middle-low rectal cancers is safe and effective with the advantages of less trauma, less bleeding, rapid recovery of intestinal function and urinary function.

Objective: To explore the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic tunnel-like peri-anterior superior iliac spine suspension(L-TASISS) or combined with stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) with outlet obstructive constipation (OOC)., Methods: A total of 119 POP patients complicated with OOC( II( to IIII( stage evaluated by POP-Q) received L-TASISS or combined with STARR in the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from August 2010 to January 2015. Clinical and follow-up data of these patients were analyzed retrospectively and compared before and after operation., Results: Among 119 cases, 51 cases(42.9%) underwent L-TASISS alone, and 68 cases (57.1%) received L-TASISS combined with STARR. All the 119 patients were successfully operated without conversion to open surgery. The operation time was (67.8±10.9) minutes, the intra-operative blood loss was (10.3±3.8) ml, the indwelling catheter time was (3.6±1.1) days, and hospital stay was (5.1±1.8) days. One month after operation, abdominal wall pain or stress occurred in 15 cases, of whom 3 cases were improved by local block injection, 1 case by incision stitches release, the rest ameliorated spontaneously within 3 months after surgery. No potential ureterostenosis, hydroureterosis, internal iliac vascular thrombosis resulting from compression of the mesh and other complications related to the mesh were found. One year after operation, all the patients were followed up. The OOC remission rate was 78.2%(93/119), of whom 76 cases were satisfied and 17 patients were completely satisfied. One case(0.8%) with stress urinary incontinence did not improve. Fifteen cases(12.6%) with algopareunia or dyspareunia did not achieve remission, but there was no new algopareunia or dyspareunia case. Eleven patients (9.2%) presented recurrence of symptoms, of whom 9 cases(7.6%) complained of sensation of incomplete evacuation. Two cases(1.7%) were graded as POP-Q II(, and 1 case (0.8%) as POP-Q III( after surgery. Constipation Score of all the patients was 1.4±0.9 (compared to 7.8±3.6 preoperatively) according to Rome III( criteria. Enterocele occurred in 53 cases (44.5%) preoperatively corresponded with only 1 case (0.8%) after operation (χ(2)=64.77, P=0.000). One hundred and six cases (86.6%) with defecation difficulties and 87 cases (73.1%) with sensation of incomplete evacuation before operation were significantly improved after surgery, corresponding with 7(5.9%) and 9 (7.6%) symptomatic cases respectively (χ(2)=155.78, P=0.000). Three cases (2.5%) with preoperative fecal incontinence symptoms were improved after operation as well., Conclusion: The procedure of L-TASISS or combined with STARR for POP patients with OCC has good short-term efficacy, and is safe and feasible.

Objective: To investigate the characteristics of gastrointestinal transit in chronic constipation patients depending on a small amount barium(SAB) gastrointestinal transit test., Methods: Imaging data of 1890 cases with chronic constipation diagnosed with Rome III( criteria undergoing the SAB gastrointestinal transit test at Department of Colorectal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from January 2009 to March 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. All the patients took 20 g medical barium sulfate diluted in porridge and erect position abdominal X-ray photographs were then taken at 4, 8, 12, 24 hours after meal and once in every 24 hour sequentially. Transit characteristics of whole gut and various segments, including stomach, small intestine, right hemicolon, left hemicolon and rectum were assessed according to the predetermined criteria., Results: All the 1890 patients showed good compliance with the complete test. Among these patients, 794 cases(42%) were diagnosed as normal transit and 1096 cases(58%) as gastrointestinal slow transit. Classified by the site of slow transit, 151 cases(8%) were abnormal gastric transit, 175(9%) cases were abnormal small intestinal transit, 986(52%) cases were slow right hemicolon transit, 1039 cases(55%) were slow left hemicolon transit, 139 cases(7%) were outlet obstruction. Among the 1096 patients with slow gut transit, 907 cases(83%) were multiple segments slow transit and 189 cases(17%) were single segment slow transit. Among 907 patients with multiple segmental slow transit, 668 cases(74%) were total colon slow transit, 61 cases(7%) were colonic slow transit combined with outlet obstruction, 138 cases(15%) were small intestine slow transit coincided with colon slow transit, 40 cases(4%) were total segments slow transit in the whole gut. Of 189 cases of single segment slow transit, 17 cases(9%) were unique gastric delayed empting, 37 cases(20%) were unitary small intestine transit dysfunction, 19 cases(10%) were right hemicolon transit defect, 78 cases(41%) were left hemicolon transit deterioration, 38 cases(20%) were outlet obstruction., Conclusions: The characteristics of gastrointestinal transit test in patients with chronic constipation varied from each other. Majority presents multi-segment slow transit combined with colon slow transit. SAB gastrointestinal transit test is helpful for surveying the transit characteristics of each segment of gut and worth clinical generalization and application.