Public participation has long been a topic of research on tourism in countries outside China. However, almost no research has been carried out on public participation in the public affairs of destinations from a holistic perspective. Most research has instead concentrated on particular types of public participation within a destination's public affairs, such as in the planning domain. This paper reviews the contributions of 133 studies that relate to the topic of public participation in destination public affairs. First, we investigate the general characteristics of these studies. This research shows that public participation was first introduced as a tourism research topic in the 1980s, that most research has been carried out in European and North American countries, and that most of the studies can be characterized as applied research, with only 26 being theoretical in nature. Second, we analyze the theoretical basis of all the papers and find that stakeholder theory, collaboration theory, new public administration theory, modern democratic theory, governance theory, and social capital theory have been the main theoretical constructs used within reported research. Third, we analyze the actual research content of these papers from seven aspects. The first being analyses of the conception and connotation of public participation in the public affairs of destinations. For this aspect, foreign researchers differentiate between community participation, local participation, aboriginal participation, resident participation, citizen participation, stakeholder participation and public participation. The second aspect analyzes the values underlying public participation in the public affairs of destinations. International studies put forward the idea that effective public participation can not only realize the potential value of government and public input in the development and management of destinations, but can also contribute to the sustainable development of each destination. The third aspect covers public participation in decision making at a destination. For this, we analyzed nine participative and collaborative decision making cases found in foreign research. The fourth aspect is public participation in tourism planning, which is one of the earliest and most in-depth fields of analysis in terms of research on public participation in the public affairs of destinations. International studies have researched the levels, ways, processes and influencing factors of public participation and how to define participants. The fifth aspect is public participation in destination marketing. In regard to this, international research shows that as a result of the complexity of destination products and resource interdependence between stakeholders, destination marketing should be collaborative. At the same time, destination branding as an integrated campaign also requires public participation. The sixth aspect is public participation in tourism infrastructure management in a destination, and our review shows that international research considers present levels of public participation in tourism infrastructure management to be inadequate. The seventh aspect concerns public participation in other areas of tourism development in communities, such as tourism events, tourism public projects, tourism research and tourism voluntary action, and our review shows that this is not universal. In conclusion, our study suggests that future research should pay attention to the following matter's if defining public participation in the public affairs of destinations and perfecting a theoretical system are the main objectives: the need to set up a mechanism that includes participation subjects, objects, levels, processes and evaluation; the need to expand research domains to cover more public affairs that require public participation; and the need to construct guidelines for actual participation and explore appropriate paths for China. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]