Search

Copyright of NTU Management Review is the property of NTU Management Review and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Journal of Chinese Institute of Food Science & Technology / Zhongguo Shipin Xuebao is the property of Journal of Chinese Institute of Food Science & Technology Periodical Office and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

(1) Background--In the critical period of ecological civilization construction, the forest resources governance system with Chinese characteristics should not only meet the new requirements of promoting harmonious coexistence between man and nature, but also ensure that the governance results effectively and fairly benefit a wider range of people. From a global perspective, government regulation, market readjustment and community participation are the three major paths of forest resources governance. For China, forest resources governance is often faced with the double failure of government and market mechanism. The Chinese government has gradually realized the importance of multiple-subjects participation in forest resources governance, and especially emphasized the unique role of communities in local forest resources governance. (2) Methods--In this paper, X Village in a city in Northeast China was selected as the research object, and the research data was collected from X Village, relevant government departments, enterprises and social organizations obtained by the research group through participant observation, semi-structured interviews and collection of secondhand data from 2018 to 2022. Based on the selective control theory, Elinor Ostrom's multi-level analysis framework and Institutional Analysis and Development framework (IAD), this paper adopted the single case study method to encode and analyze the field data from three aspects: institutional arrangements at the community level, institutional arrangements at the government level and natural resource conditions, and integrated them in the IAD framework to reveal the formal and informal interaction between grassroots governments and communities and its impact on forest resources governance. (3) Results--Under the double pressure of politics and economy, the grass-roots governments formulated differentiated policies and norms, property rights arrangements and supervision systems for different forest resources. Specifically, due to the differences in the perception of the value and function of forest resources, the grass-roots governments developed differentiated policies and management strategies. The government regulations on the exclusivity and use of different forest resources led to the selective property rights arrangements. In addition, the differences in the degree of information acquisition and the assessment of punishment for management failures constituted a selective supervision mechanism. Finally, under the joint action of these factors, the community forest resources governance presented a state of classified management. (4) Conclusions and Discussions--In order to understand and promote the formation of a new forest resources governance system, it is necessary to recognize the principal status of the community in forest resources governance. Therefore, the grass-roots governments need to change their roles. While maintaining the leading position in forest resources governance, they also need to assume the role of service provider responsible for the community, guide the community to achieve eco-friendly and sustainable development, and solve the problems in information acquisition, property rights arrangement and system management in forest resources governance. At the same time, the grass-roots governments should also actively guide governance subjects such as research institutions, enterprises, and non-governmental organizations to participate in the community forest resources governance, centering on the core relationship of "government-community", and give play to the complementary advan-tages of multiple subjects in technology, capital, information and other aspects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Journal of Technology Economics is the property of Chinese Society of Technology Economics and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The central inspection on ecological and environmental protection (CIEEP) is a significant institutional innovation in the development of ecological civilization and institutional reform personally planned, deployed, and promoted by General Secretary Xi Jinping. The CIEEP has progressively developed independent institutional logics after years of practice, development, and improvement. As new practice necessitates new theoretical justifications, this article proposes an interpretive framework combining textual analysis and fieldwork and based on the three-dimensional constructs of power, responsibility, and information. The results show that: ① The CIEEP has developed institutional logics made up of three main mechanisms: top-down power regulation, bottom-up responsibility feedback, and decentralized information aggregation. ② The CIEEP has formed two mutually reinforcing and mutually constraining positive and negative feedback mechanisms in institutional logics. Positive feedback mechanisms take power control as their starting point. The central government's power adjusts the environmental governance structure of local governments, and through information aggregation, it enhances the legitimacy of the institution and the subject of power to achieve effective governance. Negative feedback mechanisms take responsibility feedback as their starting point. Local governments are subject to excessive political and administrative pressure to implement governance responsibilities, which can lead to ineffective governance phenomena such as 'false rectification.' Through information aggregation, the ineffective governance phenomenon can weaken the legitimacy of the institution and the subject of power. Due to the existence of negative feedback mechanisms, positive feedback mechanisms cannot be separated from their influence and create a path dependence on power control. Moreover, because negative feedback mechanisms are again integrated into the operation of positive feedback mechanisms, they fail to influence positive feedback mechanisms to produce institutional effectiveness. ③ From the perspective of the relationship between the institutional path and value goals of a Chinese path to environmental governance modernization, the national environmental governance system is no longer premised on the temporal and spatial separation of effectiveness and legitimacy. Compared with the general path of 'accumulating legitimacy with effectiveness,' the CIEEP with positive and negative feedback mechanisms creates a new path of 'co-location' of legitimacy and effectiveness, which enhances the institution's identity and stability and enriches the power restriction and supervision modes of a Chinese path to environmental governance modernization. The institutional logics of the CIEEP reflect the consistency between ecological and livelihood well-being and high-quality development and are more in line with the intrinsic needs of a Chinese path to environmental governance modernization in the new era. As far as the status and function of the CIEEP are concerned, it has become an important institutional tool to realize a Chinese path to environmental governance modernization. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Journal of Shenzhen University Humanities & Social Sciences is the property of Journal of Shenzhen University (Humanities & Social Sciences) Editorial Office and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The national marine supervision system, as a distinctive institutional discourse in China, has been widely regarded by both theoretical and practical circles as a key link in observing the effectiveness of China ’s marine environmental governance. In view of this, to make the research more practical, this article intends to effectively connect the social background, theoretical resources, and current institutional practices within the framework of ‘inheriting research traditions, reflecting on current practices, and drawing on domestic and foreign experiences.’ The article attempts to explore the deep logic and challenges in the application of the supervision system by reviewing relevant research trends and analyzing the three major research categories of the current national marine supervision system: ① The achievement of the combination of ‘top-down’ hierarchical marine management and ‘bottom-up’ public participation through organizational innovation. ② The establishment of a marine ecological environment governance pattern replacing passive resolution of prominent marine ecological environment issues by active service of local marine management departments through institution‑ al innovation. ③ The realization of the transformation of the driving force for marine ecological environment governance from external forces driven by marine supervisions to internal forces through conceptual innovation. This article believes that it is still necessary to carry out further research on the marine supervision system in the Chinese context, and there is an urgent need to better understand its operating mechanism at the level of national governance and marine social transformation. Firstly, it is necessary to process and structurally interpret the marine supervision system, clarifying the operating subjects and the interactive relationships between them in the marine supervision system. Secondly, it is necessary to understand the relationship between the institutional environment and the operational subjects, clarify the mutual influence between the operational process and structure, and provide an explanatory framework in case of an institutional failure. Thirdly, it is also necessary to explore the ideal types and optimization suggestions of a normalized and standardized national marine supervision system in order to truly build a balanced governance pattern of diversity and co-governance with the interaction and participation of the government, society, and the public, and to achieve the modernization of the national governance system and governance capacity in the field of marine environmental protection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of International & Comparative Education is the property of International & Comparative Education Editorial, Beijing Normal University and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The report of the 20th National Congress of the Communist Party of China regards "invigorating China through research and education and developing a strong workforce for the modernization drive" as a special chapter, and particularly emphasizes that "education, science and technology, and human resources are the foundational and strategic pillars for building a modern socialist country in all respects". The integration of research and education is an important way to achieve the integrated development of education, technology, and talents. This study traced back to the origin and development of the integration of research and education, analyzed three specific manifestations of cross organizational integration of research and education worldwide, reviewed the development process, institutional logic, and main characteristics of University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (UCAS) in cultivating high-level innovative talents through the integration of research and education since the reform and opening up, and finally looked forward to the prospect of UCAS in cultivating top innovative talents through the integration of research and education. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Journal of Educational Studies (1673-1298) is the property of Journal of Educational Studies Editorial Office and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Nankai Business Review is the property of Nankai Business Review Editorial Office and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Teachers' professional development is the key to education reform and school improvement, but the relationship between institutional arrangement and school practice needs to be further explored. Based on the perspective of inhabited institutionalism, this study, with qualitative research methods, explores the micro-implementation process of the professional development system for junior high school teachers in the school organization practice in the western counties. It finds that most of the teachers have “ no time", “ no ability" and “no intention" to carry out their professional development, only seek “ foothold" and “ peace of mind" in “low-lying land", and their professional development model tends to be “going with the flow"; and that the low compatibility and high centrality of the schools' internal bureaucracy, human relationships and professional logic, and the loose coupling and decoupling of school organizational activities, social interactions and external educational logic, occupational logic, together result in the separation of the institutional arrangement for teachers' professional development and the organizational practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Journal of Management & Business Research (2521-4306) is the property of Chinese Management Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Journal of the Chinese Society of Animal Science is the property of Chinese Society of Animal Science and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Journal of Shenzhen University Humanities & Social Sciences is the property of Journal of Shenzhen University (Humanities & Social Sciences) Editorial Office and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Nankai Journal: Philosophy, Literature & Social Science Edition / Nankai Xuebao: Zhexue Shehui Kezue Ban is the property of Nankai Xuebao Bianjibu and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)