1. 患者自主意愿量表中文版 评估住院患者的效度和信度.
- Author
-
罗碧华, 周薇, 贾姣姣, 陈勇, 龙开炳, 余小强, and 肖水源
- Abstract
Objective: To translate the English version of the Autonomy Preference Index (API) into Chinese, and to test the validity and reliability of Chinese version of API. Methods: A total of 720 inpatients (sample 1) were recruited from six hospitals in Changsha, China. The sample 1 data was used for item analysis, exploratory factor analysis, and internal consistency reliability test. A total of 600 inpatients were recruited randomly from a general hospital (sample 2). The sample 2 data was used for confirmatory factor analysis scale structure validity. Sixty inpatients of sample I were randomly selected and retested 1 week later. Results: There were 16 items in the revised API scale, and three factors including general decision making preferences (GDMP), vignettes decision making preferences (VDMP) and information seeking preferences (ISP) were extracted by exploratory factor analysis, factor loadings of each item ranged from 0.47 to 0. 83, and 54. 78% of the total variances were explained. The confirmatory factor analysis revealed a good model fit (GFI = 0. 84, AGFI = 0.78, CFI = 0. 86, NFI = 0. 85, RMSEA = 0.08). An analysis of internal consistency yielded Cronbach' sαcoefficients were 0.80 for the whole scale, and 0.65, 0.91, 0.89 for the three factors of GDMP, VDMP and ISP, respectively. And the retest reliabilities were 0.67 for the whole instrument, and 0. 55,0. 78, and 0. 54 for the three factors respectively. Conclusion: The Chinese version of the Autonomy Preference Index (API-C-16) is proved to be reliable and eligible. It could be used to assess the degree of the patient's decision making and information-seeking preference in clinical situation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF