As an innovative carbon financial system for using carbon emission rights as collateral to secure financing, the system of carbon emission rights guarantee financing is based on the requirements of reaching peak emissions and achieving carbon neutrality and derived from the construction and operation of the carbon emissions trading market. Such a system can provide enterprises with funds that would otherwise be unavailable to foster energy conservation and emission reduction transition, provide financial institutions with new risk management tools, intensify the price discovery and resource allocation function of the carbon market, further promote the development of a carbon-neutral economy, green finance, and a carbon emission trading market, and realize the win-win objective of economic benefits and environmental benefits. However, due to a lack of formal laws and delegated regulations, the industry standard, local guidelines, and exchange rules on carbon emission rights guarantee financing are vague, inconsistent, and conflicting, causing carbon emission rights guarantee financing to encounter multiple problems, including the undefined legal nature of carbon emission rights, the controversial methods of using carbon emission rights as collateral, the uncertain registration authority of carbon emission rights guarantee financing, the controversial channel of handling collaterals, and the nonstandard use of loan funding. These problems have impeded the development of carbon emission rights guarantee financing. Therefore, it is imperative to comprehensively consider the multi-factors of law, policy, market, society, and environment, balance the multiple values of efficiency, fairness, and order, and then, in a practical and prudent manner, draw a conclusion that is best suited to the evolving trends of the current carbon market system, the stage characteristic of green transformation, and the need for financial innovation and development. Accordingly, this article argues that carbon emission rights should be defined as administrative permission rights, the manner of guarantee should be identified as a pledge, the carbon emission exchanges should be authorized as the registration authority of carbon emission rights guarantee financing, the channel of handling collateral should be confined to carbon emission exchanges, and the use of loan funding should be limited to projects involving energy conservation and emission reduction. By providing a stable and formal legal framework, carbon emission rights guarantee financing will have a brighter future of steady functioning and efficient growth. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]