Search

Objective: To summarize the current progress of vascularized bone grafting in the treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH), and to provide reference for treatment of ONFH., Methods: The literature at home and abroad on the treatment of ONFH with vascularized bone grafting was reviewed, and the mechanism, operating methods and effectiveness, indications, and complications were summarized., Results: Vascularized bone grafting is a commonly used clinical hip-preserving operation. By replacing necrotic bone tissue with vascularized bone, it can rebuild the blood circulation system, promote the healing of the necrotic area, and provide biomechanical support for the necrotic area of the femoral head, prevent the joint surface collapse. The main operations include the vascularized iliac bone flap grafting, the vascularized greater trochanter bone flap grafting, and the vascularized fibular grafting. The clinical application has achieved certain effectiveness, and the different procedures are suitable for different types of patients. The procedures need to be selected based on the patient's overall condition, the cause of ONFH, the necrosis stage, and the degree of the evaluation., Conclusion: Vascularized bone grafting has a definite effectiveness in the treatment of ONFH in the young and middle-aged. It can significantly improve hip joint function, control the further development of the disease to a great extent, effectively delay or even avoid hip arthroplasty. It is a reliable hip-preserving operation worthy of promotion.

Objectives: To investigate the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic modified Parks operation on the patients with ultra-low rectal cancer., Methods: According to the preoperative stage and intraoperative anastomotic position, 98 patients with ultra-low rectal cancer above T2 stage underwent laparoscopic Dixon operation, modified Parks operation and Miles operation, respectively. All patients were divided into 3 groups: a Dixon operation group ( n =39), a modified Parks operation group ( n =43) and a Miles operation group ( n =16). The clinical data and postoperative follow-up results were collected, compared, and analyzed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic modified Parks operation., Results: The patients were more obese, the distance between tumor and anal margin was closer, and the operation time was longer in the modified Parks operation group than those in the Dixon operation group (all P <0.05). However, the results of bleeding volume, the number of lymph nodes and the postoperative complications in the modified park operation group were similar than those in the Dixon operation group (all P >0.05). In addition, the exhaust and defecation time and the hospitalization time were shorter, and the total cost of hospitalization was lower in the modified Parks operation group than those in the Dixon operation group (all P <0.05). Although the anal function in the modified Parks operation group was poor in the early postoperative period, it reached the same level as that in the Dixon operation group from 6 months after the treatments with the regular anal function exercise ( P >0.05). There were no significant differences in tumor size, body shape, distance between tumor and anal margin, operation time, bleeding volume, number of lymph nodes detected, postoperative exhaust and defecation time between the Miles operation group and the modified Parks operation group, but the hospitalization time was shorter, the incidence of complications and the total cost of hospitalization were lower in the modified Parks operation group (all P <0.05)., Conclusions: Laparoscopic modified Parks operation is a safe, economical and effective anus preservation operation, which can not only save the anus for some patients who had to perform Miles operation, but also recover better and faster after operation. Although the early anal function of patients performed with the modified operation is poor, it can gradually recover to the same level as the patients performed with the Dixon operation.

Objective: To review the research progress of wrist arthroscopy assisted treatment of distal radius fractures., Methods: To summarize and describe the anatomical characteristics and fracture classification of the distal radius, indications and contraindications of wrist arthroscopy-assisted treatment, surgical methods, and associated soft tissue injuries, and summarize the advantages and disadvantages of the operation through a large number of literature at home and abroad on the treatment of distal radius fractures assisted by wrist arthroscopy., Results: Wrist arthroscopy as a minimally invasive technique for the treatment of distal radius fractures, compared with traditional surgery, can accurately observe intra-articular damage and perform operations under the microscope to avoid secondary damage to blood vessels, nerve, and tendon, etc. , and can achieve one-stage repair and reconstruction by repairing the ligament, trigonal fibrocartilage complex, and carpal dislocation. It has the advantages of less trauma, fast postoperative recovery, extensive indications, fewer complications, and satisfactory effectiveness., Conclusion: Wrist arthroscopy has advantages that traditional X-ray film, CT, MRI, and arthrography examinations do not have. Moreover, wrist arthroscopy has achieved satisfactory effectiveness in the adjuvant treatment of intra-articular distal radius fractures.

Objective: To investigate the feasibility and therapeutic effect of laparoscopy combined with total intersphincteric resection (Total-ISR) for extremely low rectal cancer.
 Methods: We performed laparoscopy combined with Total-ISR in 45 patients with extremely low rectal cancer (1.0 cm≤the lower edge of tumor to the anal edge≤3.0 cm) from January 2014 to December 2016. The operation time, blood loss, resection margin and overall incidence of postoperative complications were observed. The rate of local recurrence and distant metastasis after surgery during the median following-up time of 20.5 months were observed. Anal function at 3, 6, and 12 months after operation were compared.
 Results: The operation for 45 cases were successful without perioperative death. The operation time was (220±33) min and blood loss was (110±31) mL. The surgical margins were all negative. The incidence of postoperative complication was 6.7% (3/45) and no one suffered anastomotic leakage. After a median follow-up of 20.5 (6-30) months, 2 cases developed local recurrence and 1 case developed distant metastasis. According to Kirwan grade, the grade II was 24.4% (11/45), grade III was 57.8% (26/45) in 3 months after operation, and the grade II increased to 51.1% (23/45), the grade III decreased to 35.5% (16/45) after 6 months. Seven out of 40 patients in 12 months after operation reached the grade I, and 25 patients reached the grade II. There were significant differences between 3 months and 6 months, 6 months and 12 months after operation (P<0.05) in the anal function situation.
 Conclusion: It is feasible, for appropriate patients, to perform laparoscopic combined with total-ISR, especially for the patients with extremely low rectal cancer that were in early stage without invasion to the extemal sphincter. The procedure has the advantages of radical sphincter-saving, minimal invasion and economy.