This article put labor, capital, and energy factors into the consideration of biased technological progress, and used the directional distance function and Malmquist-Luenberger index to measure, identify, and compare the direction of biased technological progress in Chinese industries from 2003 to 2019. The study used the FGLS model to investigate the factors affecting industrial biased technological progress under the cases of no environmental constraints, weak environmental constraints, and strong environmental constraints, respectively. The results showed that: ‡@ Ignoring environmental constraints overestimated the total factor productivity index and the technological progress index. The total factor productivity index and technological progress index were significantly lower in the weak and strong constraint cases compared to the no constraint case. ‡A When there was no environmental constraint, the direction of industrial technological progress was mainly characterized by labor saving/capital use, labor saving/energy use, and capital use/energy saving; after adding the environmental constraint, the direction of technological progress was mainly characterized by labor use/capital saving, labor saving/energy use, and capital saving/energy use. ‡B The direction of Chinaf s industrial technological progress under environmental constraints was mainly influenced by environmental regulations, foreign direct investment, R&D intensity, openness to foreign trade, per capita capital stock, and energy production efficiency. The effect of environmental regulation on biased technological progress with no and weak environmental constraints showed an inverted eUf shape and had a positive effect on biased technological progress with strong environmental constraints. The labor-based FDI significantly hindered the biased technological progress with no and strong environmental constraints, while the capital-based FDI only had a significant negative impact on the biased technological progress with weak environmental constraints. The increase in R&D intensity was conducive to biased technological progress, while trade openness and capital deepening hindered biased technological progress. Energy production efficiency inhibited biased technological progress without environmental constraints but promoted biased technological progress with weak and strong environmental constraints. To encourage industrial green technological progress, the government should increase the level of subsidies for green technological innovation, improve and enrich environmental constraint tools, and implement phased environmental regulation policies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]