1. 单侧与双侧入路植入骨填充网袋治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折的 有限元分析与应用.
- Author
-
鲁 辉, 吴启梅, and 刘 融
- Subjects
- *
VERTEBRAL fractures , *FINITE element method , *BENDING moment , *VISUAL analog scale , *BONE cements , *ROTATIONAL motion , *BONE mechanics - Abstract
BACKGROUND: In the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture, bone-filling mesh container has a significant curative effect. Considering the operation time, lateral leakage of bone cement and the number of radiation exposure, unilateral approach is better. However, no study compared unilateral bone-filling mesh container and bilateral bone-filling mesh container from the perspective of biomechanics, lacking certain theoretical data support. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the biomechanical characteristics and clinical effects of unilateral and bilateral bone-filling mesh container approaches in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture. METHODS: (1) A finite element model was established to simulate the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture with unilateral and bilateral bone-filling mesh container. The displacement and stress changes of the whole finite element model of thoracolumbar segment in the unilateral bonefilling mesh container group and bilateral bone-filling mesh container group were compared and analyzed under 400 N vertical downward loading force and 7.5 N·m bending moment load under four working conditions. (2) A retrospective analysis was performed on 99 patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture who were treated with bone-filling mesh container from January 2018 to August 2020 in Wuhan Puren Hospital. Of them, 49 patients were treated with unilateral bone-filling mesh container and 50 patients were treated with bilateral bone-filling mesh container. Bone cement leakage rate, visual analogue scale score, and Cobb angle change were analyzed between the two groups. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: (1) Finite element model: There was no significant difference in the maximum displacement between unilateral group and bilateral group under axial, forward flexion, left bending, and left rotation conditions (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference in the maximum stress between unilateral group and bilateral group under axial, forward flexion, left bending, and left rotation conditions (P > 0.05). (2) Clinical trial: The bone cement leakage rates in the unilateral and bilateral approach groups were 12% and 16%, respectively, and the visual analogue scale score and scoliosis angle at 6 months after surgery were significantly improved compared with those before operation in both groups (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in visual analogue scale score and scoliosis angle between the two groups at 6 months after operation (P > 0.05). (3) From the perspective of biomechanics and clinical efficacy, unilateral bone-filling mesh container approach is more effective than bilateral bone-filling mesh container approach in treating osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF