Search

The end of the Second World War fundamentally changed the circumstances in Yugoslavia. The authentic revolution under the inviolable leadership of the Communist Party of Yugoslavia created a radically different political situation. There was no political force that stood against the communist rulers and they had carte blanche to build the state from the ground up. However, in the absence of their own experience, they had to rely on Soviet models. The construction of a large economic system soon became the most important segment of state policy. This paper based on archival sources of Yugoslav provenance aims to shed light on the origins, development and scope of this process. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of SKEI - International Interdisciplinary Journal / Medunarodni Interdisciplinarni Casopis is the property of University Vitez, Bosnia & Herzegovina and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Business Consultant / Poslovni Konsultant is the property of FINconsult Ltd. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Radovi Zavod za povijesne znanosti HAZU u Zaru is the property of Zavod za Povijesne Znanosti HAZU and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Transition: Journal of Economic & Politics of Transition / Tranzicija: Časopis za Ekonomiju i Politiku Tranzicije is the property of Ekonomski Institut Tuzla and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The mission of the Church in the world necessarily includes the question of temporal goods and economics. Apart from individual cases of selling one's own property and donating to the needy, the Church as an institution has claimed the right to own property in order to pursue her objectives, primarily for worship, support for the clergy, works of the apostolate, and charitable works. In the modern era, with the development of industrial society, the Church has also developed systematic teaching on economics. While the Church's economic teaching is rarely controversial -- either because it is consistent or because it isn't well known -- the Church's ownership and management of temporal goods is often subject to criticism and controversy. For this reason, the question of proper action in the economic sphere often arises. The challenge is even greater in poorer societies where the needy look to the Church for assistance. Presenting the teaching of the Church, this article seeks to achieve two goals: first, to raise awareness of the Church's positive view of economic activity as a response to God's call, and secondly, to differentiate specific roles in the economic sphere where the Church's position and conduct is in question. In the context of the first goal, the concept of solidarity investment and the principle of not-for-profit are presented. With respect to the second goal, the author presents specific actions of the Church, including the role of lay people and the role of Church charitable work. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]