Search

This article titled: The most important Islamic da'wah and relief organizations in North America) To summarize, there are several Islamic da'wah and relief organizations in North America, including the Muslim American Society (MAS), Islamic Relief USA, Helping Hand for Relief and Development, the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), the Islamic Circle of North America (ICNA), and the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA). These organizations work towards promoting Islam, providing social services, and humanitarian aid and disaster relief. They are also involved in outreach programs and educational activities to promote a better understanding of Islam and its teachings. Overall, these organizations play an important role in supporting the Islamic community in North America and extending a helping hand to those in need around the world., https://ojs.uopisl.pk/index.php/peshawarislamicus/article/view/105

Shari'ah (Islamic law) is free from any kind of conflict among legal evidences (Adill’ah) to establish a harmonized and just society in this world. In the sources of Shari'ah, contradiction is found due to certian limitations on the part of jurists as a human being. To meet the issues of contradiction, four steps (Nasa’kh, Tarjeeh, Jamma, Tawaquf) are expressed by three prominent schools of Usuliyen with a specific sequence to reconcile the emerging differences in devine guidance extracted from primary sources of Shari’ah. Although, the Hanafi school first opts for abrogation (Naskh), failing which it goes for preference (Tarjih), and finally they try reconciliation (Jamah). If all of these are not possible, it abandons all the evidences presuming that the transmitters might have committed a mistake in understanging them. This study was carried out to comparatively analyse the methodologies adopted by Jurists in a handful way. The basic cocept of taa’rud (Contradiction) is clarified with the help of definition from Islamic jurists. The article sheds a light on different methods to settle down the conflicts and contradictions from perspective of the views of different juristic schools of thought. The arguments and legal evidences have been analysed one by one to understand the approaches of jurists. The article concludes with the most preferable method of resolving conflict that we shall adopt the principle of “Bar’at-e-Asleyy’ah” in absence of any evidence to resolve the conflict emerging among two versus or traditons of Holy Prophet (SAWW), that is the practice of society before these contradicting commondments. Yet, there is crucial need to explore the topic through available resources that have made the communication of knowledge easy to researchers than ever before.

Relief and facilitation after hardship and suffering is one the central and core injunctions and teachings of Qur'an. It also stresses the precautionary steps to be taken for the blockage and prevention of harms and hardships along with some verses that how hardship should be deleted or minimized in severe and cronic situation. The above concept leads the formation and coinage of the juristic maxims of the redemption and remedy of harm or Injuriarmedium. Contrary to penetrated the Islamic Jurisprudence this short article peruses the Qur`anic verses and some exegetical writings made by the earlier commentators of Qur'an Regarding the subject matter.