Search

Palaeognaths constitute one of the most basal lineages of extant birds, and are also one of the most morphologically diverse avian orders. Their skeletal development is relatively unknown, in spite of their important phylogenetic position. Here, we compare the development of the postcranial skeleton in the emu ( Dromaius novaehollandiae), ostrich ( Struthio camelus), greater rhea ( Rhea americana) and elegant crested-tinamou ( Eudromia elegans), focusing on ossification. All of these taxa are characterized by element loss in the appendicular skeleton, but there are several developmental mechanisms through which this loss occurs, including failure to chondrify, failure to ossify and fusion of cartilages prior to ossification. Further evidence is presented here to support a reduction in size of skeletal elements resulting in a delay in the timing of ossification. This study provides an important first look at the timing and sequence of postcranial ossification in palaeognathous birds, and discusses the influence of changes in the pattern of skeletal development on morphological evolution. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The morphogenesis of the crocodilian and avian columella auris is analysed, using Alligator and Struthio as models that are studied in detail, and Crocodylus, Gallus, and Coturnix as models for comparative purposes. This investigation was undertaken to address controversies emanating from previous studies concerning the identity of archosaurian hyal elements, and to clarify confounding nomenclature that has been used for both topographic and phylogenetic purposes. We found that confusion in the identification of the reptilian and avian hyoid arch derivatives is attributable to: (1) redundant and/or inconsistently applied topographical terminology; (2) mixing of topographical and phylogenetic terminology; (3) interpretation in a recapitulatory framework; and (4) failure to consider that developmental pathways of recent archosaurians (reptilians and birds) might be divergently modified. Our analysis identifies errors in previous interpretations, misinterpretations of prior work, and histological observations that have been idealized. The most controversial issues are addressed – the derivation of the supracolumellar process; the concept of the laterohyal component; and segmentation of the distal part of the reptilian and avian columella auris. Based on new data, we suggest that the osteichthyan infrapharyngohyal, suprapharyngohyal, epihyal, and ceratohyal are not applicable terms for reptilian and avian columellar components from a phylogenetic perspective, and should not be used as topographical terms either. We further propose that the original morphogenetic program of the hyoid arch has been overwritten in newly derived evolutionary pathways of crocodilians and birds, in which a new functional and morphological patterning of the hyoid arch, as a specific sound-transmitting apparatus, have evolved. © 2009 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2009, 156, 384–410. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Ratites and tinamous are a morphologically diverse group of flightless and weakly flighted birds. As one of the most basal clades of extant birds, they are frequently used as an outgroup for studies discussing character evolution within other avian orders. Their skeletal development is not well known in spite of their important phylogenetic position, and studies have historically been plagued with small sample sizes and limited anatomical and temporal scope. Here, I describe the ossification of the skull in the emu ( Dromaius novaehollandiae), ostrich ( Struthio camelus), greater rhea ( Rhea americana), and elegant crested-tinamou ( Eudromia elegans). Skeletal development is remarkably consistent within palaeognaths, in spite of large differences in absolute size and incubation period. Adult morphology appears to play a role in interordinal differences in the sequence and timing of ossification of certain bones. Neither the timing of cranial ossification events relative to stage nor the sequence of ossification events provides any evidence in support of a paedomorphic origin of the palaeognathous palate. This study provides an important first look at the timing and sequence of skull development in palaeognathous birds, providing data that can be compared to better-studied avian systems in order to polarize ontogenetic characters. © 2009 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2009, 156, 184–200. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]