Search

We test the hypothesis that conochilid rotifers represent an independent family-level taxon within Superorder Gnesiotrocha, by analysing their phylogenetic position based on the 18S rDNA sequence of a large number of representatives of this taxon and its putative relatives. Both Bayesian and maximum likelihood analysis confirm a monophyletic clade of all gnesiotrochans with strong branch supports. Within Gnesiotrocha, Conochilidae form a strongly supported clade with representatives of all but some genera of Flosculariidae. These results refute Conochilidae as separate family-level taxon within Gnesiotrocha. This finding is also supported by a phylogenetic analysis using morphology, in particular new observations on trophi morphology. Conochilid rotifers are likely specialized Flosculariidae, which evolved to a planktonic lifestyle and reduction of coloniality within the group, in contrast to other Flosculariidae. Furthermore, our analysis reveals that two genera of Flosculariidae, Beachampia and Limnias, form a single, strongly supported clade in a sister-group relation to a clade consisting of representatives of Order Collothecacea. The present results, both regarding position of the conochild rotifers and of two genera of Flosculariidae, highlight the need for a more extensive analysis of relationships within Gnesiotrocha.

To resolve several taxonomic problems within the family Conochilidae (Rotifera, Monogononta, Flosculariacea), we initiated a comparative study of the morphology in this and related taxa using samples collected from widely separated geographical regions. As part of this study, we paid special attention to trophal morphology using scanning electron microscopy. We also constructed and analysed a data matrix comprising 19 morphological characters of 11 taxa using cladistic methods to uncover all most-parsimonious trees. The results indicate that Conochilidae share a body form with Flosculariidae, but they possess a trophal structure which clearly differentiates them from all other Flosculariacea; thus, the diagnosis of the family Conochilidae is amended to incorporate morphological characters of the trophi. The analysis of our data matrix yielded a single, most-parsimonious tree. From the topology of that tree and our scanning electron microscopy observations, we propose the following: (1) the status of Conochilidae as a separate suborder of Flosculariacea is rejected; (2) taxonomic separation of Conochilus and Conochiloides as subgenera of Conochilus is confirmed; and (3) Lacinularia causeyae Vidrine, Mclaughlin & Willis, 1985 is reallocated to a new genus within the family Conochilide, Conochilopsis gen. nov., as Conochilopsis causeyae (Vidrine et al.) comb. nov.

The morphology, systematics and distribution of the rotifer genus Scaridium Ehrenberg, 1830 are revised. The genus is transferred from Notommatidae to Scaridiidae, which is reinstated. In all, five species are recognized, two of which, S. montanum sp. n. and S. grandis sp. n., are new to science. Descriptions, a brief biometrical analysis and a key to the species are provided. Scaridium longicaudum (O.F. Muller, 1786) is cosmopolitic, S. bostjani Daems & Dumont, 1974 is probably a cosmopolitic warm stenotherm, S. elegans Segers & De Meester, 1994 is pantropic, S. montanum sp. n. occurs in the Mediterranean region and S. grandis sp. n. is recorded from Cameroon, Nigeria and Thailand.