Search

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) counter pulsation in the treatment of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) with concurrent left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease., Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 305 patients with confirmed STEMI due to LMCA occlusion (≥ 50%) by coronary angiography. They were divided into IABP and non-IABP groups according to the application of IABP or not. Two groups were further divided into 2 subgroups according to the treatment with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or drug alone. Short and long-term clinical efficacies and the incidence of complications caused by the application of IABP were analyzed in all groups and subgroups., Results: (1) PCI procedure: Successful rate of immediate post-procedure was 100%. No death, major cardiovascular event and cerebrovascular accident occurred during the procedure. The average number of stents per patient was 2.1 ± 0.7 and the average diameter and length of stent were (3.9 ± 0.6) and (24.2 ± 7.1) mm respectively. (2) SAFETY: No significant difference existed between the IABP and non-IABP groups in in-hospital massive bleeding rate (0.94% vs 1.00%, P > 0.05). However, the IABP group had a higher prevalence of mild in-hospital bleeding than the non-IABP group. (3) In-hospital and long-term major adverse cardiac event (MACE) rate: (1) IABP group had a lower MACE rate (25.3% (24/95) vs 38.5% (57/148), P < 0.05). (2) In spite of IABP implantation, the PCI subgroup had significantly a lower mortality rate than the drug subgroup (7.2% (6/83) vs 25.0% (6/24), P < 0.05). (3) The combined use of PCI and IABP was superior to other regimens with regards to decreasing short and long-term mortality (11.2% (12/107) and 25.3% (50/198), P < 0.01)., Conclusion: PCI is feasible and safe for the STEMI patients with LMCA and better short and long-term efficacies may be achieved. The use of IABP in the treatment of LMCA-related STEMI reduces MACE rate and improves survival rate.

Objective: To assess the therapeutic effect and safety of drug eluting stent for the patients with anterior wall myocardial infarction by left anterior descending artery occluded abruptly., Methods: From January 2004 to December 2008, 302 patients with anterior wall myocardial infarction in 12 hours from chest pain to treatment were treated. But only 189 patients were recruited and randomly divided into drug eluting stent group (n = 95) and bare metal stent group (n = 94). The occurrence of cardiac death, stent thrombosis, reinfarction, target vessel revascularization and re-hospitalization because of heart function failure was compared., Results: There was no difference in cardiac death [3/95 (3%) vs 7/94 (7%), P = 0.206], reinfarction [1/95 (1%) vs 5/94 (5%), P = 0.112] and re-hospitalization because of heart function failure [8 (8%) vs 5 (5%), P = 0.434]. Compared with those in bare metal stent group, the patients in drug eluting stent group has a lower rate of target vessel revascularization [2 (2%) vs 13 (14%), P = 0.009] and composite therapeutic effect endpoints [12 (13%) vs 25 (27%), P = 0.011]. There was no difference in safety endpoint or stent thrombosis [1 (1%) vs 4 (4%), P = 0.204]., Conclusion: In patients with anterior wall myocardial infarction by left anterior descending artery occluded abruptly, drug eluting stent decreases the rate of target vessel revascularization. But it has no increased stent thrombosis.

Objective: To evaluate the long-term therapeutic effects of atorvastatin via cytochrome P450 (CYP)3A4 pathway or a non-CYP 3A4 pathway statin, pravastatin, combined with clopidogrel for the patients undergoing coronary stenting., Methods: Between February 2006 and March 2007, a total of 1275 patients undergoing successful coronary stenting were randomly assigned to receive atorvastatin 20 mg/d (n = 638) or pravastatin 20 mg/d (n = 637). All patients received standard clopidogrel therapy. The primary end point was cardiac and cerebral ischemic events at 12 months, defined as a composite of cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI) or stroke. The secondary end points were major adverse cardiac and cerebral events (MACCE), stent thrombosis and TIMI hemorrhagic events at 12 months., Results: The baseline clinical characteristics, angiographic and PCI result were comparable between two groups. At 12 month follow-up, no significant difference was observed in cardiac and cerebral ischemic events between two groups (4.7% vs 5.5%, P > 0.05). Also no significant difference existed in rate of cardiac death (1.9% vs 2.5%, P > 0.05), non-fatal MI (0.5% vs 0.3% , P > 0.05), stroke (2.4% vs 2.7%, P > 0.05) and TVR (7.7% vs 5.5%, P > 0.05) between two groups. The rates of MACCE (12.4% vs 11.0%, P > 0.05), stent thrombosis (2.0% vs 2.5%, P > 0.05) and hemorrhagic events (13.0% vs 12.2%, P > 0. 05) were similar between two groups., Conclusion: The 12 month clinical outcomes were similar between patients receiving atorvastatin 20 mg/d or pravastatin 20 mg/d combined with clopidogrel after coronary stenting. It confirmed the efficacy and safety of the combination of clopidogrel with statins via different metabolic pathways.

Objective: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of stenting for selective unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) disease., Methods: The clinical data of 416 patients with ULMCA who underwent selective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were analyzed., Results: In 291 of the 416 patients (70.0%), the ULMCA lesions were located in the distal bifurcation site. A total of 503 stents were successfully deployed in 414 patients and the mean stent number was (1.2+/-0.7) stents per patient. The success rate of stenting procedure was 99.5%. During hospital stay, no patient died. The major adverse cardiac event (MACE) during in-hospitalization was 0.5% (2/416). The target lesion revascularization (TLR) rate was 4.9%. During the follow-up 16 (3.9%) patients died including 12 cases (2.9%) of cardiac death. Angiography during follow-up conducted on 136 (33.1%) patients showed that binary in-stent restenosis occurred in 20 patients (14.7%, 20/136). TLR was performed by coronary artery bypass graft in 14 patients and by drug eluting stent (DES) implantation in 6 patients respectively. The total MACE rate was 8.3% (34/411)., Conclusion: Safe and with favorable clinical outcome, selective coronary stenting for ULMCA lesions can achieve a high technical success rate.

Objective: To evaluate short-term efficacy and safety of triple antiplatelet regimen (cilostazol combined with clopidogrel and aspirin) in patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)., Methods: From October 2001 to April 2005, a total of 3135 patients underwent PCI in the General Hospital of Shenyang Command, People's Liberation Army, of which 1103 were treated with cilostazol 100 mg twice a day for 6 months in addition to aspirin and clopidogrel for 3 - 12 months as triple antiplatelet therapy regimen (triple group) after PCI, and 2032 of which received aspirin and clopidogrel for 3 - 12 months as dual antiplatelet therapy regimen after PCI (control group). The data of the incidence rates of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), subacute in-stent thrombosis (SAT), and hemorrhage events within 30 days after PCI of the two groups were retrospectively analyzed., Results: The baseline clinical characteristics were comparable between these two groups. However, the proportions of the patients receiving stent implantation, with multivessel coronary artery diseases, and receiving PCI for unprotected left main trunk diseases of the triple group (91.3%, 68.3%, and 7.1% respectively) were all significantly higher than those of the control group (89.1%, 63.3%, and 4.6%, P < 0.05, P < 0.01, and P < 0.01). The proportion of patients with chronic total occlusions who received PCI in the triple group was 10.8%, significantly lower than that of the control group (13.4%, P < 0.05). No death occurred during procedure in both groups. The 30 d mortality and the rate of MACE with 30 days after PCI of the triple group were 0.4% and 1.3%, both significantly lower than those of the control group (1.6%, and 2.6%, both P < 0.05). However, there were no significant differences in the incidence rates of SAT and major hemorrhage events between these 2 groups (0.7% vs 1.0% and 0.3% vs. 0.2% respectively, both P > 0.05)., Conclusion: This novel triple antiplatelet regimen (aspirin and clopidogrel combined with cilostazol) for PCI patients is safe and more efficient than the dual antiplatelet therapy regimen (clopidogrel and aspirin) in reducing mortality and incidence of MACE in a short-term period.

Objective: To compare the clinical effects of rapamycin-eluting stent implantation and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in treatment of the patients with multi-vessel coronary disease., Methods: From January 2002 to December 2004, 262 patients with multi-vessel coronary disease underwent CABG, and 250 age, clinical characteristics, and characteristics of coronary disease-matched patients chose to receive rapamycin-eluting stent implantation. 6-9 months after the treatment angiography of the coronary artery was conducted. All the patients were followed up for 19 +/- 14 months. The clinical outcomes were compared., Results: No intra-operative death occurred in the rapamycin-eluting stent implantation group with an operation success rate of 100%, significantly higher than that of the CABG group with 9 intra-operative deaths and an operation success rate of 96.6% (P < 0.01). Three perioperative deaths occurred in the rapamycin-eluting stent implantation with a perioperative death rate of 1.2%, not significantly different from that of the CABG group (1.9% with 5 perioperative deaths). The total death rate during hospitalization of the rapamycin-eluting stent implantation group was 1.2%, significantly lower than that of the CABG group (5.3%, P < 0.05). The rate of in-hospital major adverse cardiac event (MACE) of the rapamycin-eluting stent implantation group was 1.6%, significantly lower than that of the CABG group (5.3%, P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in MACE rate and angina pectoris recurrence during follow-up and event-free survival rate between these 2 groups., Conclusion: A better treatment for the patients with multi-vessel coronary disease, rapamycin-eluting stent implantation has the clinical effects comparable to those of the CABG.

Objective: To evaluate the in-hospital effect of emergency percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on aged patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and diabetes mellitus., Methods: The clinical data of 556 patients aged > or = 60 with AMI hospitalized from December 1995 to April 2005, who underwent emergency PCI within 24 hours after the onset, including 127 cases complicated with diabetes mellitus (Group DM) and 429 cases without diabetes (non-diabetes mellitus group, Group ND), were analyzed respectively., Results: There were not significant differences in age, sex, smoking rate, hypertension rate, myocardial infarction (MI) rate, and time between onset and treatment between these 2 groups. However, the percentages of anterior wall AMI rate, non-ST elevation myocardial infarction, Killip III-IV grade, and intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) application of Group DM were 58.3%, 13.4%, 27.6%, and 16.5%, all significantly higher than those of Group ND (46.4%, 6.8%, 27.6%, and 8.6%, P < 0.001, 0.02, 0.03, and 0.01). In Group DM, 59.1% of the infarction related artery was left anterior descending branch, and in Group ND 45.0% of the infarction related artery was left anterior descending branch (P < 0.05). The rate of triple vessel disease in Group DM was 77.2%, significantly higher than that of the Group ND (60.8%, P < 0.01). There were no significant differences in the PCI immediate success rate, intra-operational no-reflow rate, post-PCI complication rate and mortality during hospitalization between the two groups., Conclusion: Emergency in-hospital PCI is effective on aged AMI patients with diabetes mellitus.

Objective: To explore the in-hospital effect of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS)., Methods: The clinical data of 4670 hospitalized patients with ACS, 1750 with acute myocardial infarction (AMI, 37.5%) within 30 days and 2920 with unstable angina pectoris (62.5%), undergoing PCI from August 1989 to October 2004, were analyzed., Results: The total success rate of PCI procedure was 98.1% (4579/4670) for all patients, and the patency rate of infarction related artery of emergency PCI was 98.2% (825/840) in the patients with AMI onset within 24 h. The complication rate related to PCI procedure was 6.5% (304/4670). The total in-hospital mortality was 1.1% (52/4670) and the mortality during PCI procedure was 0.04% (2/4670). The duration from admission to PCI was 3.5 days +/- 2.1 days and the whole hospital stay was 12 days +/- 8 days., Conclusion: The success rate of PCI procedure in patients with ACS is high, while the in-hospital mortality and the complication rates are low, which shows that PCI has an ideal short-term effect in patients with ACS.