1. Ausmessung auf Papier oder computergestützt am Ultraschallgerät – Welches Verfahren ist genauer in der Sonografie der Säuglingshüfte?
- Author
-
K.-F. Schüttler, C. Görg, Christian-Dominik Peterlein, Nina Timmesfeld, Susanne Fuchs-Winkelmann, Markus D. Schofer, and S. Lakemeier
- Subjects
Reproducibility ,medicine.medical_specialty ,business.industry ,Computer assistance ,Ultrasound ,STRIPS ,Pencil (optics) ,law.invention ,law ,Goniometer ,Orthopedic surgery ,Medicine ,Orthopedics and Sports Medicine ,Surgery ,Radiology ,business ,Range of motion ,Nuclear medicine - Abstract
Aim Two different measurement techniques of ultrasonograms of the infant hip were evaluated with respect to reproducibility of the Graf classification and variation of α- and β-angles. Material and methods In a cross-sectional, blinded study, the hips of 207 consecutive newborn babies (101 male; 106 female) were sonographically screened at an average of 2.64 days after birth. Each hip was measured twice by three investigators with different levels of experience - a paediatric orthopaedic surgeon, a senior surgeon and a trained medical student. A mobile ultrasound system (SONOLINE G60S®, Siemens, Erlangen, Germany), equipped with a 7.5 MHz linear transducer, was used. Both hip joints were measured twice by all three investigators. The measurement was performed 6-8 weeks later in a blinded manner. The sonograms were initially printed out on high-quality paper strips and measured by pencil, ruler and goniometer. Finally, each investigator evaluated the same sonograms computer-assisted, using the trackball and dashboard of the ultrasound system. Results Concerning intraobserver reliability, we observed a significant reduction of variation both for α- and β-angles in favour of the classic measurement on printed strips (p 0.05). Conclusions This study demonstrated considerable advantages for the classic measurement of paediatric hip ultrasonograms with pencil and goniometer on printed paper strips compared to computer-aided measurement concerning variation of α- and β-angles.
- Published
- 2012