1. Predictive Value of Swab Cultures for Cryopreserved Flaps During Delayed Cranioplasties
- Author
-
Hong-Yi Lai, Chun-Ting Chen, Ching-Chang Chen, Ting-Wei Chang, Yin-Cheng Huang, Kuo-Chen Wei, Yu-Tse Liu, Zhuo-Hao Liu, Cheng-Chi Lee, Yu-Chi Wang, Mun-Chun Yeap, Chieh-Tsai Wu, Po-Hsun Tu, and Po-Chuan Hsieh
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Adolescent ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Surgical Flaps ,Cryopreservation ,Specimen Handling ,Tissue Culture Techniques ,Young Adult ,stomatognathic system ,Predictive Value of Tests ,Surgical site ,medicine ,Humans ,Surgical Wound Infection ,Child ,Aged ,Retrospective Studies ,Aged, 80 and over ,Retrospective review ,business.industry ,Infant ,Middle Aged ,Predictive value ,Cranioplasty ,Bacterial Load ,Infection rate ,Surgery ,Child, Preschool ,Female ,Neurology (clinical) ,business ,Surgical site infection ,Craniotomy - Abstract
Objective To assess the predictive value of swab cultures of cryopreserved skull flaps during cranioplasties for surgical site infections (SSIs). Methods A retrospective review was conducted of consecutive patients who underwent delayed cranioplasties with cryopreserved autografts between 2009 and 2017. The results of cultures obtained from swabs and infected surgical sites were assessed. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of swab cultures for SSIs were evaluated. Results The study included 422 patients categorized into two groups, swab and nonswab, depending on whether swab cultures were implemented during cranioplasties. The overall infection rate was 7.58%. No difference was seen in infection rates between groups. There were 18 false-positive and no true-positive swab culture results. All bacteria between swab cultures and SSI cultures were discordant. Meanwhile, there were 19 false-negative swab cultures. The results showed high specificity but low sensitivity for swab cultures to predict SSI occurrence and the pathogens. Conclusions Owing to low accuracy and sensitivity, swab cultures of cryopreserved autografts should not be routinely performed during delayed cranioplasties.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF