Search

Osteoporotic vertebral fractures frequently result in pain and decreased quality of life (QoL). The management of these fractures remains a topic of debate. Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines, we analyzed randomized controlled trials comparing percutaneous vertebroplasty (PV) with non-operative treatment (non-OT). The outcomes of interest included pain, QoL, cement leakage, and new osteoporotic vertebral fractures after 1 year. Compared to non-OT regarding pain relief, PV yielded significant improvement at 1-2 weeks, 1 month, 6 months (standard mean difference [SMD] = -0.67 (6/14; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -1.29 to -0.06; I 2  = 92%, random effects) and 1 year (mean difference = -1.07 (4/14; 95% CI: -1.97 to -0.18; I 2  = 97%, random effects). For QoL, notable improvements were observed at 1 week (standard mean difference = -2.10 (5/14; 95% CI: -3.77 to -0.42; I 2  = 98%, random effects) and 3 months (mean difference = -1.58 (4/14; 95% CI: -3.07 to -0.09; I 2  = 96%, random effects), with 1 month, 6 months and 1 year being inconclusive. A cement leakage rate of 42% (10/14; 95% CI: 25% to 59%; I 2  = 99%, random effects) was found. Further, PV did not significantly heighten the risk of new fractures within a year (odds ratio = 1.26 (6/14; 95% CI: 0.63 to 2.53; I 2  = 74%, random effects). PV emerges as a promising intervention for specific time intervals regarding pain relief, especially in the extended-term analysis, and QoL, especially in the short-term analysis, compared to non-OT. However, clinicians must consider cement leakage risks. Heterogeneity among studies underscores careful patient selection., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of preoperative embolization, used 48 hours before surgery to reduce tumor size and surgical complications in carotid body paragangliomas., Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis and Cochrane Handbook. A comprehensive literature search was performed in Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases. The inclusion criteria were: 1) observational studies, 2) reporting on diagnosed carotid body paragangliomas, 3) undergoing preoperative embolization procedures, and 4) with ethylene-vinyl alcohol as an embolic agent., Results: The study analyzed 106 patients, aged 18-79, using primarily Onyx 18 for embolization, with treatment intervals ranging from 24 hours to 2 weeks. Efficacy outcomes showed near-total devascularization in 67% of cases (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.47-0.87; I² = 74%), subtotal devascularization in 33% (95% CI: 0.12-0.54; I² = 43%), and total devascularization in 97% (95% CI: 0.88-1.00; I² = 41%), indicating significant heterogeneity across outcomes. The mean estimated blood loss was 184.46 ml (95% CI: 116.72-252.20 ml). Postembolization complication rate was exceptionally low at 1% (95% CI: 0.00-0.06; I² = 0%)., Conclusions: In conclusion, preoperative embolization of carotid body tumors achieved high rates of devascularization with minimal blood loss and a very low incidence of complications, highlighting its effectiveness and safety as a treatment strategy., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The use of invasive or noninvasive intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring post-decompressive craniectomy (DC) has been a continuous matter of debate. Accordingly, this meta-analysis aims to examine the existing evidence of both approaches and compare their impact among patients undergoing DC, guiding clinical decision-making in the management of elevated ICP. The databases used were Pubmed, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Embase. Inclusion criteria included: (1) English studies; (2) randomized and nonrandomized studies; (3) reporting on invasive OR noninvasive ICP monitoring after DC; (4) with at least one of the outcomes of interest: incidence of mortality, new cerebral hemorrhages, and the Glasgow Outcome Scale. The study followed the Cochrane and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. Thirty-six studies were included in this meta-analysis, resulting in a sample of 1624 patients. One thousand two hundred eighty-six underwent invasive monitoring, and 338 underwent noninvasive methods. In the invasive group, a mortality rate of 17% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 12%-22%), a good outcome rate of 58% (95% CI: 38%-49%), a poor outcome rate of 42% (95% CI: 21%-62%), and an overall incidence of new hemorrhages of 4% (95% CI: 0%-8%) were found. Whereas in the noninvasive sample, a mortality rate of 20% (95% CI: 15%-26%) and a good outcome rate of 38% (95% CI: 25%-52%) were obtained. It seems that the effectiveness of invasive and noninvasive ICP monitoring methods are comparable in post-DC patients. While invasive monitoring remains gold standard, noninvasive methods offer a safer and cost-effective alternative, potentially improving post-DC patient care, and can mostly be used simultaneously with invasive methods., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Jugular paragangliomas are highly vascularized tumors that can grow in challenging neurovascular compartments and are particularly challenging to resect. There is still no consensus whether preoperative embolization should be employed to minimize intraoperative morbidity., Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted by searching PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases for key terms including "embolization," "jugular paragangliomas," and "surgery.", Results: This review included 25 studies with 706 patients and 475 (67%) preoperative embolizations. Polyvinyl alcohol particles were the most common embolic agent (97.8% of all patients who underwent embolization). Complication rate of embolization was 1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0%, 2%). Preoperative embolization was significantly associated with less intraoperative estimated blood loss (mean difference of -7.92 dL [95% CI: -9.31 dL, -6.53 dL]), shorter operating room times (mean difference of -55.24 minutes [95% CI: -77.10 minutes, -33.39 minutes]), and less overall tumor recurrence (odds ratio = 0.23 [95% CI: 0.06, 0.91]) compared with resective surgery alone. Preoperative embolization had no impact on the development of postoperative new cranial nerve deficits not associated with embolization (odds ratio = 1.17 [95% CI: 0.47, 2.91]) and achievement of gross total resection (odds ratio = 1.92 [95% CI: 0.67, 5.53])., Conclusions: Preoperative embolization may provide surgical efficiency with faster surgical times and less bleeding and safety with diminished overall recurrence via safe embolization with minimal risks. These results must be considered taking into account the nonrandomness of studies., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Despite the recent increase in publications centered on intracranial-intracranial (IC-IC) bypasses for complex aneurysms, there is no systematic evidence regarding their outcomes. The purpose was to assess the outcomes of patients subjected to IC-IC bypass for aneurysms., Methods: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis, a systematic review was conducted. Criteria for inclusion entailed studies with a cohort of at least 4 patients having undergone IC-IC bypass for aneurysms, detailing at least one outcome, such as patency, clinical outcomes, complications, and procedure-related mortality. When the study included patients who had undergone extracranial-intracranial (EC-IC) bypass, the authors extracted the patency and clinical data to juxtapose them with the results of IC-IC., Results: Of the 2509 shortlisted studies, 22 met our inclusion criteria, encompassing 255 patients and 263 IC-IC bypass procedures. The IC-IC bypass procedure exhibited a patency rate of 93% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 89%-95%). The patency rate of IC-IC and EC-IC bypasses did not significantly differ (odds ratio=0.60 [95% CI: 0.18-1.96]). Concerning clinical outcomes, 91% of the IC-IC patients had positive results (95% CI: 85%-97%), with no significant disparity between the IC-IC and EC-IC groups (odds ratio=1.29 [95% CI: 0.43-3.88]). After analysis, the complication rate was 11% (95% CI: 5%-18%). Procedure-related mortality was 1% (95% CI: 0%-4%)., Conclusions: IC-IC bypass is valuable for the treatment of complex intracranial aneurysms, boasting high patency and positive clinical outcomes. Complications are unusual, and procedure-related mortality is minimal. Comparing IC-IC and EC-IC led to no significant differences., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: High-grade gliomas (HGGs) present a challenge in neuro-oncology, often necessitating surgical resection for optimal management. Ultrasound holds promise in achieving better gross total resection (GTR) and improving outcomes. This meta-analysis systematically evaluates literature providing robust evidence on the use of intraoperative ultrasonography (iUSG) in HGG resection., Methods: Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines a comprehensive search was made across PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science utilized terms related to iUSG for HGG resection. The meta-analysis examined randomized trials and observational cohort studies on iUSG-guided HGG resection. GTR, subtotal resection, and postresection complications were assessed. Statistical analysis, employing R software for a single proportion analysis with confidence intervals of 95%, I 2 statistics for heterogeneity, and the instrumental variables method with restricted maximum likelihood for a random effects model., Results: A total of 178 patients were included in our study. The GTR overall rate in patients with iUSG-guided resection was found to be 64% (95% confidence interval: 46%-81%). Two-dimensional ultrasound remains dominant at 80% against other options of ultrasound. Complications were reported at a 15% rate (95% confidence interval: 7%-23%)., Conclusions: Our study provided robust data on the utilization of iUSG-guided resection regarding the attainment of GTR and the complications related to resection. However, challenges such as outcome heterogeneity and limited complication reporting highlight the need for further research to optimize iUSG in HGG treatment. Long-term follow-up studies on patient survival and postsurgery quality of life will complement existing literature, guiding clinical practices in managing HGG., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension (IIH) is a condition characterized by elevated intracranial pressure. Although several mechanisms have been proposed as underlying causes of IIH, no identifiable causative factor has been determined for this condition. Initial treatments focus on weight or CSF reduction, but severe cases may require surgery. This study compares outcomes in IIH patients treated with lumboperitoneal shunts (LPSs) versus ventriculoperitoneal shunts (VPSs)., Methods: This systematic-review and meta-analysis follows Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines and includes studies about VPS and LPS patients, reporting one of the outcomes of interest. We conducted searches on PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library., Results: Our analysis involved twelve studies, comprising 5990 patients. The estimated odds ratio (OR) for visual improvement was 0.97 (95% CI 0.26-3.62; I 2  = 0%) and for headache improvement was 0.40 (95% CI 0.20-0.81; I 2  = 0%), favoring LPS over VPS. Shunt revision analysis revealed an OR of 1.53 (95% CI 0.97-2.41; I 2  = 77%). The shunt complications showed an OR of 0.91 (95% CI 0.68-1.22; I 2  = 0%). The sub-analyses for shunt failure uncovered an OR of 1.41 (95% CI 0.92-2.18; I 2  = 25%) and for shunt infection events an OR of 0.94 (95% CI 0.50-1.75; I 2  = 0%)., Conclusions: The interventions showed general equivalence in complications, shunt failure, and other outcomes, but LPS seems to hold an advantage in improving headaches. Substantial heterogeneity highlights the need for more conclusive evidence, emphasizing the crucial role for further studies. The findings underscore the importance of considering a tailored decision between VPS and LPS for the management of IIH patients., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: When traditional therapies are unsuitable, revascularization becomes essential for managing posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA) or vertebral artery aneurysms. Notably, the PICA-PICA bypass has emerged as a promising option, overshadowing the occipital artery-PICA (OA-PICA) bypass. The objective was to compare the safety and efficacy of OA-PICA and PICA-PICA bypasses., Methods: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the safety and efficacy of OA-PICA and PICA-PICA bypasses for treating posterior circulation aneurysms., Results: We analyzed 13 studies for the PICA-PICA bypass and 16 studies on the OA-PICA bypass, involving 84 and 110 patients, respectively. The median average follow-up for PICA-PICA bypass was 8 months (2-50.3 months), while for OA-PICA, it was 27.8 months (6-84 months). The patency rate for OA-PICA was 97% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 92%-100%) and 100% (95% CI: 95%-100%) for PICA-PICA. Complication rates were 29% (95% CI: 10%-47%) for OA-PICA and 12% (95% CI: 3%-21%) for PICA-PICA. Good clinical outcomes were observed in 71% (95% CI: 52%-90%) of OA-PICA patients and 87% (95% CI: 75%-100%) of PICA-PICA patients. Procedure-related mortality was 1% (95% CI: 0%-6%) for OA-PICA and 1% (95% CI: 0%-10%) for PICA-PICA., Conclusions: Both procedures have demonstrated promising results in efficacy and safety. PICA-PICA exhibits slightly better patency rates, better clinical outcomes, and fewer complications, but with a lack of substantial follow-up and a smaller sample size. The choice between these procedures should be based on the surgeon's expertise and the patient's anatomy., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Glioblastoma (GBM) is an aggressive tumor known for its poor prognosis. Despite extensive research into its molecular and clinical aspects, the current management strategies have shown limited efficacy in improving survival rate. Despite some preclinical studies exploring the combination of temozolomide (TMZ) with biguanides such as metformin (MET) and others, the potential benefits of this combination remain uncertain. The aim of this study is to evaluate the overall survival (OS) in GBM murine-models treated with a combination of TMZ + biguanide compared to those treated with TMZ alone., Methods: We systematically searched Medline, Embase, and Lilacs databases for studies comparing TMZ + biguanide versus TMZ alone in GBM models and reporting OS data. The mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence interval and random-effects model was adopted., Results: Nine studies were included in this systematic review. The meta-analysis comprised 6 studies involving 85 rat-models, with 45 subjects undergoing combined-treatment. GBM-murine models treated with TMZ + biguanide exhibited notably superior OS rates compared to those who received TMZ alone, showing an MD of 21.0 days (6.9-35.0). Within the subgroup of orthotopic models, the OS was also significantly better in combination-therapy with an MD of 23.7 days (6.5-40.9). Similarly, in the subgroup where MET was used as biguanide therapy, TMZ + MET demonstrated a significant increase in OS, with an MD of 27.4 days (6.0-48.8). In immunocompromised models, the combination-therapy also exhibited higher survival rates, with an MD of 13 days (9.4-16.6)., Conclusions: This systematic review and meta-analysis provide compelling evidence regarding the beneficial effects of TMZ + biguanide in GBM models compared with TMZ alone, resulting in a significant improvement in OS., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Treating complex posterior circulation aneurysms poses challenges, and extracranial to intracranial (EC-IC) bypass techniques are potential therapeutic options. However, the safety and efficacy of this approach for posterior circulation aneurysms remain unclear. The study's objective was to assess the safety and efficacy of EC-IC bypass in these aneurysms., Methods: Adhering to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines, we conducted a systematic review on EC-IC revascularization for posterior circulation aneurysms. Included studies had at least 4 patients and reported data on mortality, patency, complications, or clinical outcomes. Favorable clinical outcomes were defined as modified Rankin Scale below 3 or Glasgow Outcome Scale above 3, and complications were any issues related to the bypass procedure., Results: From 3036 articles reviewed, 22 studies involving 196 patients who underwent 210 EC-IC bypass procedures for posterior circulation aneurysms were selected. The median follow-up period of 14 studies was 31.66 months (6-61 months). Final follow-up indicated a high bypass patency rate of 96% [95% confidence interval [CI]: 91%-100%; I 2  = 12%], with a mortality rate of 5% [95% CI: 1%-9%; I 2  = 0%]. Additionally, 83% [95% CI: 70%-96%; I 2  = 77%] of patients showed good outcomes at the last follow-up. Complications were observed in 40% [95% CI: 26%-55%; I 2  = 80%]. Heterogeneity was associated with specific studies., Conclusions: EC-IC bypass procedures are a viable treatment option for posterior circulation aneurysms, with high bypass patency rates and favorable clinical outcomes. However, complications, especially neurological deficits, exist. Open revascularization remains essential for neurovascular surgeons dealing with complex aneurysms., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)