Search

The carotid sinus nerve branches off the glossopharyngeal nerve just after its appearance from the jugular foramen, descends along the internal carotid artery, and enters the carotid sinus. There have been many studies of the pathway and the course of the carotid sinus nerve and its communications with surrounding nerves. The intercommunication is exceedingly complicated. Acknowledgment of its anatomic diversity can be important in specific operations dealing with this area. Herein we review the anatomy, variations, pathology, and clinical applications of the carotid sinus nerve., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: This 3-dimensional histologic study aimed to provide a precise description of the meningeal structures in the jugular foramen., Methods: 22 posterior skull base tissue blocks containing the jugular foramen region were obtained from 11 human cadaveric heads. These blocks were plastinated and cut into serial sections. After staining, these sections were examined under an optical microscope and used to reconstruct a 3-dimensional visualization model., Results: At the intracranial orifice of the jugular foramen, the meningeal dura formed 2 separate dural perforations: the glossopharyngeal meatus and the vagal meatus. The arachnoid extended into 2 dural meatuses and terminated at the inferior ganglion of the glossopharyngeal nerve in the glossopharyngeal meatus and the superior ganglion of the vagus nerve in the vagal meatus. At the intraforaminal part of the jugular foramen, the meningeal dura encased the glossopharyngeal nerve to form a dural sheath while encasing the vagus and accessory nerves to form a dural network. At the extracranial orifice of the jugular foramen, the dural wall of the jugular bulb extended downward to form a dense connective tissue sheath. The initial end of the internal jugular vein invaginated into this sheath and fused with the jugular bulb., Conclusions: Knowledge of the anatomy of the meningeal architecture of the jugular foramen can be helpful in avoiding surgical complications of the lower cranial nerves when this complex area is approached., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The chemoreceptor network, consisting of the glossopharyngeal nerve and carotid body (GPN-CB), is essential for the regulation of blood pH. Its ischemic insults after subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), which may contribute to acidosis, have not been investigated., Methods: Twenty-three hybrid rabbits were used. They were divided into 3 groups: 5 as a control group, 5 as a sham group, and the remaining 13 as the study group. Injections included 1 cm 3 serum saline and 1 cm 3 autolog arterial blood into the cisterna magna in the sham and study group, respectively. Blood pH values of all animals were recorded. After 2 weeks, animals were euthanized. The number of normal and degenerated neurons of the carotid bodies (CBs) was counted by stereologic methods and analyzed statistically., Results: Two of 13 rabbits died within the second week. The mean blood pH values were measured as 7.35 ± 0.07 in the control group (n = 5), 7.33 ± 0.06 in the sham group (n = 5), 7.29 ± 0.05 in rabbits with slight acidosis (n = 6), and 7.23 ± 0.02 in rabbits with prominent acidosis (n = 7). In the control group, the average normal neuronal density of the CBs was 6432 ± 790/mm 3 and the degenerated neuron density was 11 ± 3/mm 3 , whereas the degenerated neuronal density in CBs was 35 ± 8/mm 3 in the sham group and 1034 ± 112/mm 3 in the slight acidosis-developed group (n = 6; P < 0.05). Conversely, degenerated neuron density of CBs was 2134 ± 251/mm 3 in the prominent acidosis-developed animals (n = 7; P < 0.005). Interestingly, in the rabbits who died, the degenerated neuron density of the CB was 3160 ± 840/mm 3 ., Conclusion: An inverse relationship between neurodegeneration in the CB and pH values secondary to the disruption of the GPN-CB network after SAH was found, which may contribute to developing acidosis., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The lower cranial nerves must be identified to avoid iatrogenic injury during skull base and high cervical approaches. Prompt recognition of these structures using basic landmarks could reduce surgical time and morbidity., Methods: The anterior triangle of the neck was dissected in 30 cadaveric head sides. The most superficial segments of the glossopharyngeal, vagus and its superior laryngeal nerves, accessory, and hypoglossal nerves were exposed and designated into smaller anatomic triangles. The midpoint of each nerve segment inside the triangles was correlated to the angle of the mandible (AM), mastoid tip (MT), and bifurcation of the common carotid artery., Results: A triangle bounded by the styloglossus muscle, external carotid artery, and facial artery housed the glossopharyngeal nerve. This nerve segment was 0.06 ± 0.71 cm posterior to the AM and 2.50 ± 0.59 cm inferior to the MT. The vagus nerve ran inside the carotid sheath posterior to internal carotid artery and common carotid artery bifurcation in 48.3% of specimens. A triangle formed by the posterior belly of digastric muscle, sternocleidomastoid muscle, and internal jugular vein housed the accessory nerve, 1.90 ± 0.60 cm posterior to the AM and 2.30 ± 0.57 cm inferior to the MT. A triangle outlined by the posterior belly of digastric muscle, internal jugular vein, and common facial vein housed the hypoglossal nerve, which was 0.82 ± 0.84 cm posterior to the AM and 3.64 ± 0.70 cm inferior to the MT., Conclusions: Comprehensible landmarks can be defined to help expose the lower cranial nerves to avoid injury to this complex region., (Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)