Search

Introduction and Objectives: This systematic review aims to evaluate the incidence and influencing factors of urethral stricture (US) in relation to different BPH endoscopic techniques., Materials and Methods: We performed a systematic literature review using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Controlled Register of Trials. The incidence of US was estimated through comparative studies between different endoscopic techniques. Patients were assigned into groups according to the type of surgery (enucleation, ablation and resection group). Incidences of US were pooled using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel Method with the random effect model and reported as Risk Ratio (RR), 95% Confidence Intervals (CI), and p-values., Results: A total of 80 studies were included for meta-analysis. The pooled incidence of US was 1.7% after enucleation, 2.1% after ablation, 3.8% after monopolar (M)-TURP and 2.1% after bipolar (B)-TURP. The incidence of US was significantly lower after Enucleation than after TURP (RR 0.58 95% CI 0.39-0.84, p = 0.004). US incidence was lower for Ablation procedures than TURP, but the difference did not reach significance (RR 0.79 95% CI 0.61-1.3, p = 0.08). However, this was significant in the subgroup of M-TURP studies (RR 0.67, 95% CI, 0.49-0.91, p = 0.01). Sub-analysis showed that the risk of US was significantly lower after Enucleation than after TURP within 12 months after surgery (RR 0.51 95% CI 0.33-0.81, p = 0.004)., Conclusion: The study shows an increased incidence of US after TURP compared to enucleation and ablation procedures. The main factors related to increased US incidence are the use of monopolar energy, instrument caliber and duration of postoperative catheterization., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Purpose: Bladder neck stenosis (BNS) is a long-term complication of surgical procedures for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). We performed a systematic literature review and a meta-analysis of the incidence of BNS after transurethral procedures for BPH., Methods: We performed a systemic literature review using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Controlled Register of Trials. We accepted only randomized trials comparing transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) vs. other transurethral surgery for BPH that were grouped in Ablation vs. Enucleation modalities. The incidences of BNS were pooled using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel Method with the random effect model and expressed as Risk Ratios, 95% Confidence Intervals, and p values. Study heterogeneity was assessed utilizing the I 2 value., Results: 72 studies were identified for meta-analysis, 46 comparing TURP vs. Ablation and 26 TURP vs. Enucleation. The pooled incidence of BNS was 1.3% after TURP, 0.66% after enucleation and 1.2% after Ablation. The incidence of BNS was higher after TURP than after Enucleation but the difference was not statistically significant (RR 1.75 95% CI 0.81-3.79, p = 0.16). There was no significant heterogeneity among the studies (I 2 0%, Chi 2 4.11, p = 0.90). The incidence of BNS was higher after TURP than after Ablation, but the difference was not statistically significant (RR 1.31, 95% CI 0.82-2.11, p = 0.26) with no significant heterogeneity (I 2 0%, Chi 2 21.1, p = 0.51)., Conclusion: Our study showed no difference in the rate of BNS incidence among randomized trials comparing TURP vs. Ablation vs. Enucleation and can be used as a reference to counsel patients undergoing BPH surgery., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Objectives: To assess the accuracy of intra-rectal coil magnetic resonance imaging (ER-MRI) for staging early prostate cancer (EPC)., Materials and Methods: ER-MRI was performed with the Magnetom Symphony 1.5 Tesla system. ER-MRI and pathology findings were statistically correlated., Results: One hundred and fifty-four consecutive patients underwent radical prostatectomy (RRP) for EPC (cT1c-2 Nx M0). An average age was 66, mean PSA 11.04 µg/L (median 7.33 µg/L) and mean pathologic Gleason score 6. Pathology detected 97 out of 154 patients (63 %) as EPC and 57 cases (37 %) as extra-prostate extension (EPED) (pT3) with extra-capsular extension (ECE) (pT3a) in 41 (27 %) and seminal vesicle invasion (SVI) (pT3b) in 16 (10 %). ER-MRI staged 100 patients (65 %) as cT2 and 54 (35 %) as EPED with ECE in 37 cases (24 %) and SVI in 17 (11 %). ER-MRI sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, overall accuracy resulted respectively 0.78, 0.96, 0.86, 0.92, 0.91 for ECE as well as 0.88, 0.98, 0.82, 0.99 and 0.97 for SVI., Conclusion: ER-MRI was effective in detecting preoperative EPC under-staging. In the next future, multi-parametric 3-Tesla ER-MRI will be the procedure for diagnosing, staging and following-up prostate cancer patients.