Search

Background: Compliance to the entire Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) protocol improves surgical recovery, where higher compliance improves outcomes. However, specific items may predict improved recovery more than others. Studies have evaluated the impact of individual ERAS recommendations though they are either single center, not based in the United States (US), or focus on colorectal procedures only. This study aims to evaluate compliance on surgical outcomes in two large healthcare systems in the US across four surgery types. Methods: Compliance to individual recommendations, limited patient characteristics, and outcomes data from two US ERAS Centers of Excellence (CoE) for hepatectomy, pancreatectomy, radical cystectomy, and head and neck (HN) resections were evaluated. Outcomes included 30‐day Clavien–Dindo≥3, readmission, mortality, and length of stay (LOS). Multivariate regressions were performed as appropriate for the data for each surgery type. Clavien≥3 was included to control for severity of complications, and the CoE variable was force‐retained. Results: A total of 2886 records were analyzed. Controlling for CoE and severity of patient complications, early removal of Foley catheter was associated with significant reductions in LOS in the liver, pancreas, and HN procedures and reductions in complications in the liver and pancreas. Limited use of NG tubes reduced LOS in the pancreas and complications in urology. Oral carbohydrate loading reduced LOS in the pancreas, and patient education reduced mortality in HN patients. Conclusions: This study reports the effect of ERAS compliance on outcomes, by surgery type, in a multi‐institutional US setting. Future studies should validate these findings and consider surgery‐specific predictive models comprised of individual ERAS recommendations in real‐world applications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: As Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) programs expand across numerous subspecialties, growth and sustainability on a system level becomes increasingly important and may benefit from reporting multidisciplinary and financial data. However, the literature on multidisciplinary outcome analysis in ERAS is sparse. This study aims to demonstrate the impact of multidisciplinary ERAS auditing in a hospital system. Additionally, we describe developing a financial metric for use in gaining support for system-wide ERAS adoption and sustainability. Methods: Data from HPB, colorectal and urology ERAS programs at a single institution were analyzed from a prospective ERAS Interactive Audit System (EIAS) database from September 2015 to June 2019. Clinical 30-day outcomes for the ERAS cohort (n = 1374) were compared to the EIAS pre-ERAS control (n = 311). Association between improved ERAS compliance and improved outcomes were also assessed for the ERAS cohort. The potential multidisciplinary financial impact was estimated from hospital bed charges. Results: Multidisciplinary auditing demonstrated a significant reduction in postoperative length of stay (LOS) (1.5 days, p < 0.001) for ERAS patients in aggregate and improved ERAS compliance was associated with reduced LOS (coefficient − 0.04, p = 0.004). Improved ERAS compliance in aggregate also significantly associated with improved 30-day survival (odds ratio 1.04, p = 0.001). Multidisciplinary analysis also demonstrated a potential financial impact of 44% savings (p < 0.001) by reducing hospital bed charges across all specialties. Conclusions: Multidisciplinary auditing of ERAS programs may improve ERAS program support and expansion. Analysis across subspecialties demonstrated associations between improved ERAS compliance and postoperative LOS as well as 30-day survival, and further suggested a substantial combined financial impact. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]