Search

Female control of household resources is often associated with consumption preferences which favor basic needs and child welfare. Using data from the Dominican Republic, this study tests differences in spending patterns, consumption preferences, and child nutritional (anthropometric) status according to four definitions of female household headship. Female-headed households (FHH) allocate the same amount or less of their budgets to food than male-headed households (MHH), in absolute and proportional terms. FHH consume higher quality, more expensive and protein-dense foods (more animal products; less of beans and rice) than MHH. Average caloric adequacy per adult-equivalent is equal or lower in FHH, but children's anthropometric status is the same or higher; it is significantly higher in low-income FHH, possibly due to intrahousehold allocation of food which favors children.

Different definitions of female household headship have different implications for the economic status and welfare of members of female headed households (FHH). Using data from the Dominican Republic, this study compares four definitions of FHH: self-definition; no adult males (18-60) present; female earns over 50% of earned or of total income. The definitions are associated, but each defines a different group. Half of self-defined FHH contain adult males; half of those in which the woman is the major earner are self-defined FHH. In the Dominican Republic, female headship by any definition is not associated with lower income per capita, but sources of income are quite different: FHH are more dependent on transfers and girls than wages; FHH defined by earnings are of higher income on average. Demographic composition of FHH is significantly different from male headed households MHH.