Search

In view of the recent revival of interest in circadian biology and circadian epidemiology at the Medical University of Vienna, it seems appropriate to highlight the rich and pioneering history of circadian research in Austria. Among the forefathers of circadian research in Vienna are Otto Marburg (1874-1948), who discovered important elements of the pineal gland physiology, Robert Hofstätter (1883-1970), who used pineal gland extract in obstetrics/gynecology, and Paul Engel (1907-1997), who discovered that the pineal gland was controlled by light. More recently, Vera Lapin (1920-2007) showed that surgical removal of the pineal gland increased tumor growth, while Franz Waldhauser (*1946) investigated melatonin in conjunction with night work. Michael Kundi (*1950) and his team conducted among the first studies demonstrating differences in rhythms of night workers and early evidence for health impairments among them. Furthermore, Vienna-born Erhard Haus (1926-2013) pioneered the discovery of the role and importance of melatonin in relation to numerous diseases. This rich pioneering contribution of scientists in Vienna or with roots in Vienna is continued today by a new generation of chronobiologists, epidemiologists and clinicians in Vienna whose new insights contribute to the rapidly developing field of circadian rhythms research. Current topics and contributions relate to the impact of circadian rhythm disruption on health, and the application of chronotherapeutic approaches in clinical and preventive settings., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background: Excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) is the main complaint in many neurological sleep disorders, such as idiopathic hypersomnia, narcolepsy, or obstructive sleep apnea/hypopnea syndrome (OSAS). The validity of the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) as a screening tool for EDS remains controversial. We therefore investigated (1) the interrelation of the ESS total score and the mean sleep latency (MSL) during the multiple sleep latency test (MSLT) and (2) the diagnostic accuracy of the ESS total score to detect EDS in patients with the chief complaint of subjective EDS., Methods: A total of 94 patients (48 males) with subjective EDS were included in this study. Regression analyses and ROC curve analyses were carried out to assess the predictive value of the ESS score for MSL., Results: The ESS score significantly predicted a shortened MSL (p = 0.01, β = -0.29). After dichotomizing into two groups, the ESS score predicted MSL only in patients with hypersomnia or narcolepsy (p = 0.01, β = -0.33), but not in patients with other clinical diagnoses (e. g. OSAS; p = 0.36, β = -0.15). The ROC curve analyses indicated an optimal ESS cut-off value of 16 with a sensitivity of 70%; however, specificity remained unsatisfactory (55.6%)., Conclusions: Our results suggest that the predictive value of the ESS score in patients with subjective EDS is low and patient subgroup-specific (superior in hypersomnia/narcolepsy vs. other diagnoses) and that the commonly used cut-off of 11 points may be insufficient for clinical practice.

The aim of this paper was to assess the prevalence of morning headaches in the Austrian general population and to analyse their relationship to daytime functioning and quality of sleep. In a nationwide survey, we recruited 1000 adults (478 men, 522 women, age over 14 years). For this study, we selected all subjects with self-reported morning headaches as well as controls matched for age, sex, size of hometown, level of education and marital status. Forty-eight persons reported morning headaches making a prevalence of 5% in the Austrian general population. Compared to controls, subjects with morning headaches reported more often daytime sleepiness (50% vs. 18.8%, p = 0.003), difficulties in staying awake (47.9% vs. 18.8%, p = 0.005) and falling asleep involuntarily (29.2% vs. 8.3%, p = 0.019). Moreover, they reported a longer sleep onset latency (26.5 ± 27.5 vs. 13.5 ± 13.5 min, p = 0.005), and more often sleep disturbances (58.3% vs. 14.6%, p < 0.001), tossing and turning around during the night (50.0% vs. 8.0%, p < 0.001), problems with sleep maintenance (64.6% vs. 22.9%, p < 0.001) and the symptom of restless legs (20.8% vs. 2.1%, p = 0.01). In addition, subjects with morning headaches felt less often refreshed in the morning (18% vs. 51%, p < 0.001) and reported regular use of medication more often (64.6% vs. 29.2%, p = 0.001) than controls. After correction for multiple testing, the differences in sleep maintenance, sleep disturbances and regular use of medication remained statistically significant. In conclusion, this is the first Austrian population-based controlled study to show that morning headaches afflict one out of 20 persons and are related to self-reported sleep problems.

Objective: The purpose of this study of 100 patients suffering from sleep-disorders was to determine correlations between their subjective health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and objective variables in sleep initiation and maintenance, sleep architecture, objective quality of awakening, psychophysiological parameters and subjective quality of sleep and awakening., Methods: Objective measurements were obtained from overnight diagnostic polysomnography. Subjective HRQoL was determined from the Quality of Life Index (QLI, Mezzich and Cohen) completed prior to the adaptation night. Other measurements included subjective and objective quality of sleep and awakening (psychometry) the evening before and morning after polysomnographic investigations., Results: 63% of the patients were suffering from nonorganic and 37% from organic sleep disorders (SDs). Within the first group, nonorganic insomnia predominated; within the second, sleep apnea. Subjective HRQoL correlated well with subjective sleep and awakening quality, especially in nonorganic SDs. There were only a few correlations of objective measurements with subjective HRQoL: in the total group of SD patients HRQoL correlated with sleep stage S2, and in nonorganic SDs with attention scores and psychophysiological measurements (mainly the pulse rate in the evening and morning)., Conclusion: Our findings suggest only a weak relationship between objective sleep variables and subjective HRQoL in both organic and nonorganic SDs. However, we found various significant correlations of HRQoL with subjective measurements of sleep, especially in nonorganic SDs.

Motor activity as a diagnostic parameter has become an important feature in many fields of medicine and psychology. The concept of mobility and immobility implies the assumption that mental and behaviour disorders involve abnormal activity that can be measured to characterise the disorder itself, to diagnose its presence and to document the impact of treatment. In sleep research, activity monitoring by wrist actigraphs has proven its usefulness as an efficient method to assess the rest-activity cycle over long time periods and to estimate sleep-related features such as sleep efficiency and total sleep time. But like many other techniques and devices, activity monitoring has some limitations and drawbacks. This paper describes the basic features of wrist actigraphy in measuring nocturnal and daytime motor activity.

In addition to their 40-hour working week (Mon-Fri, 8 a.m.-4 p.m.) residents at the emergency department of the General Hospital of Vienna have to do approximately six 24-hour duties. The reasons for conducting the present field study were physicians' complaints about tiring night duties. 11 residents (4 women, 7 men; aged between 28 and 43 years, x = 33.5 +/- 4.9 years; working at the emergency department for 4-50 months, x = 31 +/- 20 months) were tested on an ordinary working day at 9 a.m. and midnight. Self-rating concerning sleep duration, perception of stress and workload on the days of the investigations were found to be representative of other prolonged duties. Subjects reported a usual nocturnal sleep duration of only 6-7 hours. Stress was regarded as moderate by most of the volunteers. Blood pressure and pulse rates did not show diurnal changes. Generally, residents felt significantly (p < 0.01) less awake at night than in the morning, but reported only slight vegetative and somatic stress reactions or annoyances as assessed by the Fahrenberg self-rating scale. Interindividual differences were found; residents who had been working at the emergency department for a longer period experienced a more pronounced impairment. Further studies are required in order to objectify a nocturnal decrease in vigilance (by means of computer-assisted EEG) and to evaluate potential performance deficits (by means of psychometric tests).