1. Most computational hydrology is not reproducible, so is it really science?
- Author
-
Dawei Han, Christopher J. Duffy, Berit Arheimer, Thorsten Wagener, Christopher Hutton, and Jim Freer
- Subjects
Hydrology ,010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences ,business.industry ,Computer science ,0208 environmental biotechnology ,Foundation (evidence) ,02 engineering and technology ,01 natural sciences ,Transparency (behavior) ,Rigour ,020801 environmental engineering ,Workflow ,Software ,Computer software ,Code (cryptography) ,business ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences ,Water Science and Technology - Abstract
Reproducibility is a foundational principle in scientific research. Yet in computational hydrology the code and data that actually produces published results are not regularly made available, inhibiting the ability of the community to reproduce and verify previous findings. In order to overcome this problem we recommend that reuseable code and formal workflows, which unambiguously reproduce published scientific results, are made available for the community alongside data, so that we can verify previous findings, and build directly from previous work. In cases where reproducing large-scale hydrologic studies is computationally very expensive and time-consuming, new processes are required to ensure scientific rigor. Such changes will strongly improve the transparency of hydrological research, and thus provide a more credible foundation for scientific advancement and policy support.
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF