Search

Glaucoma is both a progressive optic neuropathy and a neurodegenerative disease affecting structures in the primary visual pathway. Other vision-associated areas may also be affected, including the corpus callosum which is involved in inter-hemispheric transfer. This study evaluated dominance wave propagation during binocular rivalry to probe the efficacy of the inter-hemispheric transfer in 20 patients with mild open angle glaucoma and 25 age-matched controls. The two groups were matched for functional measures such as stereo-acuity, binocular visual acuity, and visual field mean deviation. Monocular functional and structural measures were equivalent for the left and right eye of each participant. Using Wilson et al.’s travelling wave paradigm [Nature, 412 (2001) 907–910], intra- and inter-hemispheric failure rates of traveling wave transmission and the travelling wave propagation times were recorded for the two groups. For the control group, the wave propagation failure rate was significantly greater for the inter- than for the intra-hemispheric condition, but for the glaucoma group, the failure rates were equally high for the two conditions. The wave propagation time was significantly longer for the inter- than for the intra-hemispheric condition for the control group, while the opposite was true for the glaucoma group. These results reveal changes in the wave dynamics of rivalry dominance in patients with mild glaucoma who otherwise have normal performance on standard functional measures.

Observers perceive targets as farther while performing the Jendrassik Maneuver (JM) suggesting that eye position is registered as more divergent. We examined the effects of the JM perturbation in three studies of perceptual judgment that rely on accurate registration of absolute distance: size constancy, stereoscopic depth, and the magnitude of the Pulfrich illusion. The data showed no significant differences between the JM and control conditions. The lack of an effect may be due to the fact that vergence is not a perfect cue to distance. Furthermore, the relative contribution of extraocular muscle afference to registered eye position may be less significant for higher order perceptual judgments.

This study measured the fading times of peripheral targets as a function of whether viewing was monocular or binocular, and of brightness contrast. Data from a binocularly normal group showed Troxler fading to be significantly faster with monocular (i.e., patched) than with binocular viewing. In contrast, one-eyed observers showed significantly longer fading times than the two-eyed observers viewing monocularly and equivalent times to their binocular viewing. A control experiment showed that these findings were not due to worse fixation stability, larger pupil sizes, or an unusually large blinking rate in the enucleated group. The enucleated group actually exhibited a slight miosis, equivalent fixation stability, and a normal blinking rate. In both experiments, the times to fading of all observers were a function of brightness contrast. We conclude that in binocularly normal observers patching or closing one eye does not produce monocular vision but rather a condition of weak binocular rivalry, and that the absence of inhibitory binocular interactions in the enucleated group may explain, in part, their resistance to fading and their superior performance in other contrast-defined tasks.

A proprioceptive hypothesis for the control of eye movements has been recently proposed based on neuroanatomical tracing studies. It has been suggested that the non-twitch motoneurons could be involved in modulating the gain of sensory feedback from the eye muscles analogous to the gamma () motoneurons which control the gain of proprioceptive feedback in skeletal muscles. We conducted behavioral and psychophysical experiments to test the above hypothesis using the Jendrassik Maneuver (JM) to alter the activity of motoneurons. It was hypothesized that the JM would alter the proprioceptive feedback from the eye muscles which would result in misregistration of eye position and mislocalization of targets. In the Wrst experiment, vergence eye movements and pointing responses were examined. Data showed that the JM aVected the localization responses but not the actual eye position. Perceptual judgments were tested in the second experiment, and the results showed that targets were perceived as farther when the aVerent feedback was altered by the JM. Overall, the results from the two experiments showed that eye position was perceived as more divergent with the JM, but the actual eye movements were not aVected. We tested this further in Experiment 3 by examining the eVect of JM on the amplitude and velocity of saccadic eye movements. As expected, there were no signiWcant diVerences in saccadic parameters between the control and experimental conditions. Overall, the present study provides novel insight into the mechanism which may be involved in the use of sensory feedback from the eye muscles. Data from the Wrst two experiments support the hypothesis that the JM alters the registered eye position, as evidenced by the localization errors. We propose that the altered eye position signal is due to the eVect of the JM which changes the gain of the sensory feedback from the eye muscles, possibly via the activity of non-twitch motoneurons. © 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Previous research has shown that unilaterally enucleated observers demonstrate better luminance-defined form perception compared to monocularly viewing controls, and similar performance to control observers viewing binocularly (Vision Res. 37(17) (1997) 2465). In Experiment 1 we asked whether the perception of form, where form is defined by other attributes than luminance, is also improved compared to monocularly viewing controls. We tested 16 enucleated observers and 25 controls viewing monocularly and binocularly for their ability to detect and recognize form from texture (texture-defined (TD) form) and form from motion (motion-defined (MD) form). There was no difference between the three groups for TD form perception. However, enucleated observers had significantly poorer MD form perception than did binocularly viewing controls. In Experiment 2 we asked whether poor performance on the perception of MD form might be due to a general reduction in motion processing abilities. To examine this possibility, we used a motion coherence task. We tested eight unilaterally enucleated and 14 monocularly and binocularly viewing control observers on a horizontal coherent motion discrimination task. The monocularly viewing controls showed no naso-temporal asymmetry in direction discrimination for coherent motion. In contrast, the enucleated group showed an asymmetry in direction discrimination where temporalward motion coherence thresholds were significantly higher than those for nasalward motion. These latter findings are discussed in terms of the absence of binocular competition during the development of motion processing pathways.

The objective of this paper was to study the characteristics of closed-loop smooth pursuit eye movements of 15 unilaterally eye enucleated individuals and 18 age-matched controls and to compare them to their performance in two tests of motion perception: relative motion and motion coherence. The relative motion test used a brief (150 ms) small stimulus with a continuously present fixation target to preclude pursuit eye movements. The duration of the motion coherence trials was 1s, which allowed a brief pursuit of the stimuli. Smooth pursuit data were obtained with a step-ramp procedure. Controls were tested both monocularly and binocularly. The data showed worse performance by the enucleated observers in the relative motion task but no statistically significant differences in motion coherence between the two groups. On the other hand, the smooth pursuit gain of the enucleated participants was as good as that of controls for whom we found no binocular advantage. The data show that enucleated observers do not exhibit deficits in the afferent or sensory pathways or in the efferent or motor pathways of the steady-state smooth pursuit system even though their visual processing of motion is impaired.

This study examined two aspects of binocular function in patients with age-related macular degeneration (AMD): summation/inhibition of visual acuity and rivalry. The performance of 17 patients with AMD was compared with that of 17 elderly controls and 21 young people. Monocular and binocular acuities were measured using a multiple-E optotype test. Binocular ratios, defined as the better-eye acuity divided by the binocular acuity, were calculated. We also measured eye dominance during rivalry (proportion of time the participants reported perceiving the input to each eye) and rivalry rates (number of alternations per minute). The results showed that while overall binocular ratios were similar for the three groups, the frequency distributions of people who experienced inhibition, equality or summation were different for the young and AMD groups. In the rivalry test, patients experienced more piecemeal perception than the elderly and young controls, but time dominance from the better-seeing eye was comparable for the three groups. Rivalry rates decreased with age and further with pathology. Moreover, rivalry time dominance of the worse-seeing eye was negatively correlated with interocular acuity differences for the AMD group.

Previous research has shown that observers with early unilateral enucleation have selectively better sensitivity to luminance contrast than monocular viewing controls [González et al., 2002; Vision Research 36 (1) (1996) 175; Vision Research 36 (1996) 3011; Vision Research 37 (17) (1997) 2465]. We asked whether unilateral enucleation specifically enhances all levels of luminance processing. Enucleated observers, as well as binocular and monocular viewing controls, detected global shape in radial frequency (RF) patterns [Vision Research 38 (1998) 2555] at low contrast. Control observers were tested in two monocular conditions in which the stimulus was presented to one eye, while the fellow eye: (1) viewed a luminance-matched grey field or (2) was covered by a dark eye patch. Sensitivity to low-contrast global shape was equivalent in enucleated observers and binocular controls. More importantly, enucleated observers showed superior performance to that of controls in either monocular condition. At low contrast, the dichoptic control group was more sensitive than controls wearing an eye patch, which suggests that dichoptic viewing is a superior method of testing when comparing monocular control performance to that of monocularly deprived populations. The previously reported enhanced sensitivity to luminance-defined form in early enucleated observers also occurs for low-contrast global shape discrimination.

Physiological and behavioral evidence shows that the directionally preponderant subcortical control of optokinetic nystagmus (OKN) in lower mammals is supplemented in higher mammals by bidirectional cortical control. It is hypothesized that this cortical control allows higher mammals to cope with the parallactic movement of the scene produced by linear motion of the body. In particular, it is hypothesized that a coupling between OKN and stereopsis allows higher mammals to stabilize the images of objects within the plane of fixation while ignoring motion signals from objects at other distances. According to this hypothesis the gain of the slow phase of OKN should be highest for binocularly fused moving stimuli and attenuated for binocularly disparate displays. The results of Experiment 1 confirmed this prediction although the effects of accommodation were not ruled out completely. In Experiment 2 a display moving in one direction was presented across the central retina at the same time as one moving in the opposite direction was presented in the upper and lower periphery. It was found that subjects do not show OKN in the direction of the peripheral display unless it is binocularly fused and the central display is disparate. In Experiment 3 a stationary display of dots was superimposed on a moving display. It was found that OKN is not inhibited by the stationary display when it has a horizontal disparity and the moving display is fused. Experiment 4 found that horizontal OKN is disrupted by the sudden introduction of a vertical disparity in the stimulus. Since accommodative state was kept constant in the last three experiments, the data show that binocular disparities can help a person to stabilize selectively the image of one moving display while ignoring conflicting motion signals from another display.