Search

Molecular classification of endometrial carcinomas (EC) divides these neoplasms into four distinct subgroups based on their molecular background. Given its clinical significance, genetic examination is becoming integral to the diagnostic process. This study aims to share our experience with the molecular classification of EC using immunohistochemistry (IHC) and next-generation sequencing (NGS). We included all ECs diagnosed at two institutions from 2020 to the present. All cases were prospectively examined by IHC for MMR proteins and p53, followed by NGS using a customized panel covering 18 genes, based on which ECs were classified into four molecular subgroups: POLE mutated, hypermutated (MMR deficient), no specific molecular profile (NSMP), and TP53 mutated. The cohort comprised 270 molecularly classified ECs: 18 (6.6%) POLE mutated, 85 (31.5%) hypermutated, 137 (50.7%) NSMP, and 30 (11.1%) TP53 mutated. Twelve cases (4.4%) were classified as 'multiple classifier' EC. Notably, most of these cases with available follow-up (6/9) behaved aggressively. Within the POLEmut EC group, 3/4 cases had advanced tumors, including one patient who died of the disease. Similarly, in the MMRd/TP53mut group, 3/5 patients with available follow-up had metastatic disease, leading to death of the patient in 1 case. ECs of NSMP showed multiple genetic alterations, with the most common mutations being PTEN (44% within the group of NSMP), followed by PIK3CA (30%), ARID1A (21%), and KRAS (9%). Our findings suggest that combining immunohistochemistry with NGS offers a more reliable classification of ECs, including 'multiple classifier' cases, which, based on our observations, tend to exhibit aggressive behavior. Additionally, our data highlight the complex genetic background of NSMP ECs, which can facilitate further stratification of tumors within this group and potentially help select patients for dedicated clinical trials., Competing Interests: Declarations. Institutional review board statement — Ethics approval: The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the General University Hospital in Prague in compliance with the Helsinki Declaration (No. 2140/19 S-IV). The Ethics Committee waived the requirement for informed consent as according to the Czech Law (Act. no. 373/11 and its amendment Act no. 202/17); it is not necessary to obtain informed consent in fully anonymized studies. Conflict of interest: The authors declare no competing interests., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

A syndromic association between a subset of testicular/paratesticular neoplasms is well established. Such examples include Carney complex and large cell calcifying Sertoli cell tumor, Peutz-Jeghers syndrome and intratubular large cell hyalinizing Sertoli cell neoplasia, and VHL syndrome and clear cell papillary cystadenoma of the epididymis.However, recent studies proposed potential novel links between some testicular and paratesticular neoplasms with certain tumor syndromes. While more studies are still needed to solidify these associations, recent research suggests that a subset of Leydig cell tumors may arise in patients with hereditary leiomyomatosis and renal cell carcinoma syndrome or that some seminomas may occur in Lynch syndrome patients. Additionally, an association between testicular sex cord stromal tumors and paratesticular sarcomas with Familial adenomatous polyposis syndrome and DICER1 syndrome, respectively, has been proposed as well. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the intricate relationship between familial syndromes and associated testicular and paratesticular tumors, shedding light on their clinicopathological and molecular characteristics., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is the third most common malignancy associated with Lynch syndrome (LS). The current European urology guidelines recommend screening for LS in patients with UTUC up to the age of 60 years. In this study, we examined a cohort of patients with UTUC for potential association with LS in order to establish the sensitivity of current guidelines in detecting LS. A total of 180 patients with confirmed diagnosis of UTUC were enrolled in the study during a 12-year period (2010-2022). Loss of DNA-mismatch repair proteins (MMRp) expression was identified in 15/180 patients (8.3%). Germline analysis was eventually performed in 8 patients confirming LS in 5 patients (2.8%), including 4 germline mutations in MSH6 and 1 germline mutation in MSH2. LS-related UTUC included 3 females and 2 males, with a mean age of 66.2 years (median 71 years, range 46-75 years). Four of five LS patients (all with MSH6 mutation) were older than 65 years (mean age 71.3, median 72 years). Our findings indicate that LS-associated UTUCs can occur in patients with LS older than 60 years. In contrast to previous studies which used mainly highly pre-selected populations with already diagnosed LS, the most frequent mutation in our cohort involved MSH6 gene. All MSH6 mutation carriers were > 65 years, and UTUC was the first LS manifestation in 2/4 patients. Using current screening guidelines, a significant proportion of patients with LS-associated UTUC may be missed. We suggest universal immunohistochemical MMRp screening for all UTUCs, regardless of age and clinical history., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

The existence of a true mixed germ cell-sex cord stromal tumor (MGSCT) of the testis remains controversial. Based on our experience with rare testicular tumors in this spectrum, we sought to perform a detailed clinicopathologic and molecular study of MGCSCT. Eight cases of testicular MGSCT were morphologically reviewed, screened for chromosomal aberrations (using array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) and low pass genomic sequencing), and analyzed by next generation sequencing (The Illumina TruSight Tumor 170). Immunohistochemistry for OCT3/4, Nanog, SALL4, DMRT1, and inhibin was performed on the cohort. Clinical data and follow-up were assessed by medical record review. All patients were karyotypically normal men aged 27-74 years (median 41). All tumors had a similar biphasic morphology characterized by various proportions of the sex cord component resembling granulosa cell tumor of adult type and the germ cell component cytomorphologically akin to spermatocytic tumor. Germ cells were haphazardly scattered throughout the tumor or arranged in larger groups, without tubular formation. In 4 cases, atypical mitoses were found within the germ cells. Additionally, in 2 cases there was invasion into the spermatic cord, adjacent hilar soft tissue and into the tumor capsule, which contained both tumor components. Immunohistochemically, focal nuclear expression of DMRT1 was found in the germ cell component in 7/7 analyzable tumors, while SALL4 was positive in 6 cases and negative in one case. All tumors were negative with OCT3/4 and Nanog. The sex cord stromal component had immunoreactivity for inhibin in 7/7 analyzable cases. Four of 8 cases were cytogenetically analyzable: 4/8 by low pass genomic sequencing and 2/8 by aCGH. The results of both methods correlated well, revealing mostly multiple chromosomal losses and gains. One case revealed loss of chromosome 21; 1 case had loss of chromosomes 21 and 22 and partial gain of 22; 1 case had loss of chromosomes 22 and Y, partial loss of X, and gain of chromosomes 20, 5, 8, 9, 12, and 13; and the remaining one gain of chromosomes 20, 3, 6, 8, 2x(9), 11, 2x(12), 13, 14, 18, and 19. Three cases were analyzable by NGS; clinically significant activating mutations of either FGFR3 or HRAS were not detected in any case. Follow-up was available for 4 patients (12, 24, 84, and 288 months) and was uneventful in all 4 cases. The identification of extratesticular invasion of both the germ cell and sex cord stromal components, the DMRT1 expression, and the presence of atypical mitoses in germ cells argue for the neoplastic nature of the germ cell component. The molecular genetic study revealing multiple chromosomal losses and gains in a subset of the cases provides the first evidence that molecular abnormalities occur in testicular MGSCT. Multiple chromosomal aneuploidies, namely, recurrent losses of chromosomes 21 and 22 and gains of 8, 9, 12, 13, and 20, indicate that the germ cell component might be related to the morphologically similar spermatocytic tumor, which is characterized by extensive aneuploidies including recurrent gains of chromosomes 9 and 20 and loss of chromosome 7. In summary, our data support that rare examples of true MGSCT of the testis do exist and they represent a distinct tumor entity with admixed adult-type granulosa cell tumor and spermatocytic tumor components.

The spectrum of the renal oncocytic tumors has been expanded in recent years to include several novel and emerging entities. We describe a cohort of novel, hitherto unrecognized and morphologically distinct high-grade oncocytic tumors (HOT), currently diagnosed as "unclassified" in the WHO classification. We identified 14 HOT by searching multiple institutional archives. Morphologic, immunohistochemical (IHC), molecular genetic, and molecular karyotyping studies were performed to investigate these tumors. The patients included 3 men and 11 women, with age range from 25 to 73 years (median 50, mean 49 years). Tumor size ranged from 1.5 to 7.0 cm in the greatest dimension (median 3, mean 3.4 cm). The tumors were all pT1 stage. Microscopically, they showed nested to solid growth, and focal tubulocystic architecture. The neoplastic cells were uniform with voluminous oncocytic cytoplasm. Prominent intracytoplasmic vacuoles were frequently seen, but no irregular (raisinoid) nuclei or perinuclear halos were present. All tumors demonstrated prominent nucleoli (WHO/ISUP grade 3 equivalent). Nine of 14 cases were positive for CD117 and cytokeratin (CK) 7 was either negative or only focally positive in of 6/14 cases. All tumors were positive for AE1-AE3, CK18, PAX 8, antimitochondrial antigen, and SDHB. Cathepsin K was positive in 13/14 cases and CD10 was positive in 12/13 cases. All cases were negative for TFE3, HMB45, Melan-A. No TFEB and TFE3 genes rearrangement was found in analyzable cases. By array CGH, complete chromosomal losses or gains were not found in any of the cases, and 3/9 cases showed absence of any abnormalities. Chromosomal losses were detected on chromosome 19 (4/9), 3 with losses of the short arm (p) and 1 with losses of both arms (p and q). Loss of chromosome 1 was found in 3/9 cases; gain of 5q was found in 1/9 cases. On molecular karyotyping, 3/3 evaluated cases showed loss of heterozygosity (LOH) on 16p11.2-11.1 and 2/3 cases showed LOH at 7q31.31. Copy number (CN) losses were found at 7q11.21 (3/3), Xp11.21 (3/3), Xp11.22-11.21 (3/3), and Xq24-25 (2/3). CN gains were found at 13q34 (2/3). Ten patients with available follow up information were alive and without disease progression, after a mean follow-up of 28 months (1 to 112 months). HOT is a tumor with unique morphology and its IHC profile appears mostly consistent. HOT should be considered as an emerging renal entity because it does not meet the diagnostic criteria for other recognized eosinophilic renal tumors, such as oncocytoma, chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (RCC), TFE3 and TFEB RCC, SDH-deficient RCC, and eosinophilic solid and cystic RCC.

There is a group of lesions in the head and neck region derived from branchial arches and related structures which, when inflamed, are characterized by the formation of cysts lined by squamous or glandular epithelium and surrounded by a heavy inflammatory infiltrate rich in germinal centers. In the thyroid, the main source of various structures which may cause diagnostic dilemma is the ultimobranchial body. To investigate the spectrum of such thyroid lesions, the consultation files were reviewed for thyroid samples containing pathological structures regarded to arise from the ultimobranchial body. Positive reaction with antibodies against CK5/6, p63, galectin 3, and CEA, and negative reaction with antibodies against thyroglobulin, TTF-1, and calcitonin were used to confirm the diagnosis. The specific subtype of the ultimobranchial body-derived lesion was then determined based on histological examination of H&E-stained slides. Twenty-one cases of ultimobranchial body-derived lesions were retrieved from the consultation files, 20 of them along with clinical information (M/F = 6/14, mean age 55 years, range 36-68 years). Lesions derived from the ultimobranchial body were classified as follows: (hyperplastic) solid cell nests (nine cases), solid cell nests with focal cystic change (five cases), cystic solid cell nests (two cases), branchial cleft-like cyst (four cases), and finally a peculiar Warthin tumor-like lesion (one case). We suggest that the common denominator of these structures is that they all arise due to activation of inflammatory cells around the vestigial structures, which leads to cystic dilatation and proliferation of the epithelial component.