1. Do we need prophylactic anticoagulation in ambulatory patients with lung cancer? A review
- Author
-
Evangelos Dimakakos, Konstantinos N. Syrigos, Sofia Talagani, Ioannis Vathiotis, Elias Kotteas, Ioannis Dimitroulis, Theodora Katsarou, Georgia Gomatou, and Vassilis Vlahakos
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Lung Neoplasms ,Clinical Decision-Making ,Population ,Hemorrhage ,Risk management tools ,030204 cardiovascular system & hematology ,Malignancy ,Risk Assessment ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Risk Factors ,medicine ,Humans ,education ,Intensive care medicine ,Lung cancer ,Blood Coagulation ,Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ,education.field_of_study ,business.industry ,Patient Selection ,Anticoagulants ,Cancer ,Venous Thromboembolism ,medicine.disease ,Treatment Outcome ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Ambulatory ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,Risk assessment ,Complication ,business - Abstract
Venous thromboembolism is a common complication of malignancy. Lung cancer is considered one of the most thrombogenic cancer types. Primary thromboprophylaxis is not currently recommended for all ambulatory patients with active cancer. In the present narrative review we aim to summarize recent data on the safety and efficacy of primary thromboprophylaxis as well as on venous thromboembolism risk assessment, focusing on ambulatory patients with lung cancer. A potential benefit from prophylactic anticoagulation with low molecular weight heparins in terms of venous thromboembolism risk reduction and increased overall survival in patients with lung cancer, without a significant increase in bleeding risk, has been reported in several studies. Recent studies also reveal promising results of direct oral anticoagulants regarding their efficacy as primary thromboprophylaxis in patients with cancer, including those with lung cancer. However, the use of different study methodologies and the heterogeneity of study populations among the trials limit the extraction of definite results. More randomized, controlled trials, restricted to a well-characterized population of patients with lung cancer, are greatly anticipated. The use of risk assessment tools for stratification of venous thromboembolic risk is warranted. The development of an accurate and practical risk assessment model for patients with lung cancer represents an unmet need.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF