Search

• MVA-BN-WEV encodes the envelope pre-protein for 3 encephalitic EEVs to induce broad immune responses. • Safety profile of MVA-BN-WEV was favorable at all administered doses, with no clinically meaningful differences in the incidence of AEs between dose groups. • WEEV-, EEEV-, VEEV- and VV-specific neutralizing antibody responses were observed in all dose groups, with the magnitude of the response increasing with increasing dose. • MVA-BN-WEV vaccine has the potential to protect against all three alphaviruses and orthopoxviruses. Three encephalitic alphaviruses—western, eastern, and Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus (WEEV, EEEV and VEEV)—can cause severe disease and have the potential to be used as biological weapons. There are no approved vaccines for human use. A novel multivalent MVA-BN-WEV vaccine encodes the envelope surface proteins of the 3 viruses and is thereby potentially able to protect against them all, as previously demonstrated in animal models. This first-in-human study assessed the safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of MVA-BN-WEV vaccine in healthy adult participants. Forty-five participants were enrolled into 3 dose groups (1 × 10E7 Inf.U, 1 × 10E8 Inf.U, and 2 × 10E8 Inf.U), received 2 doses 4 weeks apart, and were then monitored for 6 months. The safety profile of MVA-BN-WEV was acceptable at all administered doses, with incidence of local solicited AEs increased with increasing dose and no other clinically meaningful differences between dose groups. One SAE (Grade 2 pleural effusion) was reported in the lowest dose group and assessed as possibly related. No AEs resulted in death or led to withdrawal from the second vaccination or from the trial. The most common local solicited AE was injection site pain, and general solicited AEs were headache, fatigue, and myalgia. MVA-BN-WEV induced humoral immune responses; WEEV-, EEEV- and VEEV-specific neutralizing antibody responses peaked 2 weeks following the second vaccination, and the magnitude of these responses increased with dose escalation. The highest dose resulted in seroconversion of all (100 %) participants for WEEV and VEEV and 92.9 % for EEEV, 2 weeks following second vaccination, and durability was observed for 6 months. MVA-BN-WEV induced cellular immune responses to VEEV E1 and E2 (EEEV and WEEV not tested) and a dose effect for peptide pool E2. The study demonstrated that MVA-BN-WEV is well tolerated, induces immune responses, and is suitable for further development. Clinical Trial Registry Number: NCT04131595. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Vaccines have significantly reduced the impact of numerous deadly viral infections. However, there is an increasing need to expedite vaccine development in light of the recurrent pandemics and epidemics. Also, identifying vaccines against certain viruses is challenging due to various factors, notably the inability to culture certain viruses in cell cultures and the wide-ranging diversity of MHC profiles in humans. Fortunately, reverse vaccinology (RV) efficiently overcomes these limitations and has simplified the identification of epitopes from antigenic proteins across the entire proteome, streamlining the vaccine development process. Furthermore, it enables the creation of multiepitope vaccines that can effectively account for the variations in MHC profiles within the human population. The RV approach offers numerous advantages in developing precise and effective vaccines against viral pathogens, including extensive proteome coverage, accurate epitope identification, cross-protection capabilities, and MHC compatibility. With the introduction of RV, there is a growing emphasis among researchers on creating multiepitope-based vaccines aiming to stimulate the host's immune responses against multiple serotypes, as opposed to single-component monovalent alternatives. Regardless of how promising the RV-based vaccine candidates may appear, they must undergo experimental validation to probe their protection efficacy for real-world applications. The time, effort, and resources allocated to the laborious epitope identification process can now be redirected toward validating vaccine candidates identified through the RV approach. However, to overcome failures in the RV-based approach, efforts must be made to incorporate immunological principles and consider targeting the epitope regions involved in disease pathogenesis, immune responses, and neutralizing antibody maturation. Integrating multi-omics and incorporating artificial intelligence and machine learning-based tools and techniques in RV would increase the chances of developing an effective vaccine. This review thoroughly explains the RV approach, ideal RV-based vaccine construct components, RV-based vaccines designed to combat viral pathogens, its challenges, and future perspectives. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Optimizing and scaling up the monoglycosylated vaccine production process for clinical trials and future product development. • IVR-190 mg presents comparable stability with fully glycosylated IVR-190 virus vaccine. • IVR-190 mg induced substantial cross-strain HA- and NA-inhibiting antibody responses. • Toxicology study provides safety profiles for IVR-190 mg for further clinical study. The yearly epidemics and unpredictable outbreaks of influenza have raised serious concerns globally and led to prioritizing the development of an effective vaccine to protect against newly emerging variants. Previously, we demonstrated that monoglycosylated influenza virus vaccines derived from A/California/7/2009 or an updated A/Brisbane/02/2018 (IVR-190) vaccine strain recommended by WHO are superior to fully glycosylated vaccines and could broadly protect against past and new coming H1N1 variants. However, whether such a monoglycosylated virus vaccine can be mass-produced to meet clinical demands and stable enough to provide consistent efficacy against H1N1 viruses remains unclear. Herein, we developed a platform for the pilot-scale production of the monoglycosylated split virus vaccine from the IVR-190 strain (IVR-190 mg) with a robust and cost-effective manufacturing process. The critical parameters of inoculum dose, concentration of kifunensine, and optimized Endo H treatment process were comprehensively investigated. Several aims for preclinical studies of IVR-190 mg were achieved, including [i] the execution of three engineering batch runs to validate lot-to-lot consistency, [ii] the establishment of IVR-190 mg specifications to meet the acceptance criteria of a conventional influenza vaccine, [iii] an investigation of the stability profile of IVR-190 mg , and completion of a safety evaluation by conducting an animal toxicology study. The toxicology study under GLP guidance found no systemic toxicity after rabbits were vaccinated with IVR-190 mg. The serological data showed that IVR-190 mg is highly immunogenic and effective in inducing a cross-strain protective level of antibody immune responses, including hemagglutination-inhibition titers, viral neutralization activity, and broad HA- and NA-inhibiting antibody titers against past and new H1N1 viruses. In conclusion, this study provides efficacy and safety profiles of IVR-190 mg for further clinical study and shows that this vaccine without a glycan shield has great potential to be safe and protective against H1N1 variants. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• SARS-CoV-2 NSP3 and human PARP14 share a significant degree of homology. • Antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 NSP3 can bind human PARP14 protein. • Antibodies against NSP3 bind human skeletal muscle cells and astrocytes. • When G159R + G162R mutations were introduced into NSP3, the cross-reaction was eliminated. • The cross-reaction may be a reason for the muscular and neurological complications. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines protect the public and limit viral spread. However, inactivated viral vaccines use the whole virus particle, which contains many non-capsid proteins that may cause adverse immune responses. A report has found that the ADP-ribose-binding domains of SARS-CoV-2 non-structural protein 3 (NSP3) and human poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase family member 14 (PARP14) share a significant degree of homology. Here, we further show that antibodies against 2019 novel SARS-like coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) NSP3 can bind human PARP14 protein. However, when G159R + G162R mutations were introduced into NSP3, the antibody titer against human PARP14 decreased 14-fold. Antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 NSP3 can cross-react with human skeletal muscle cells and astrocytes, but not human embryonic kidney 293T cells. However, when G159R + G162R mutations were introduced into NSP3, the cross-reaction was largely inhibited. The results imply that COVID-19 patients with high antibody titers against NSP3 may have high risks of muscular and/or neurological complications. And the possible strategies to improve the safety of inactivated viral vaccines are also discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A third dose of inactivated virus vaccine (IVV) boosts neutralizing antibodies, reducing SARS-CoV-2 transmission rate and COVID-19 severity. However, the impact of RBD-elicited antibodies and their neutralizing activity by the boost of IVV is unknown. We investigated the impact of IVV's boost shot on RBD-elicited antibodies and their neutralizing activity in 18 subjects receiving the second and third IVV doses. Using an RBD antibodies depletion assay, we assessed the neutralizing activity of RBD-elicited antibodies. After the second dose, RBD-antigen elicitation accounted for ∼60% of neutralizing activity, which increased to 82% after the IVV boost against ancestral SARS-CoV-2. Depleting class 3 and class 4-specific antibodies with the Beta-RBD protein revealed that NAbs targeting RBD class 1 and class 2 subdomains increased from 57% to 75% post-boost. These findings highlight the significant enhancement of RBD-specific antibodies, especially against RBD class 1 and class 2, with IVV booster doses. Our study offers valuable insights for optimizing COVID-19 vaccine strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is the predominant cause of acute lower respiratory infection (ALRI) in young children worldwide, yet no licensed RSV vaccine exists to help prevent the millions of illnesses and hospitalizations and tens of thousands of young lives taken each year. Monoclonal antibody (mAb) prophylaxis exists for prevention of RSV in a small subset of very high-risk infants and young children, but the only currently licensed product is impractical, requiring multiple doses and expensive for the low-income settings where the RSV disease burden is greatest. A robust candidate pipeline exists to one day prevent RSV disease in infant and pediatric populations, and it focuses on two promising passive immunization approaches appropriate for low-income contexts: maternal RSV vaccines and long-acting infant mAbs. Licensure of one or more candidates is feasible over the next one to three years and, depending on final product characteristics, current economic models suggest both approaches are likely to be cost-effective. Strong coordination between maternal and child health programs and the Expanded Program on Immunization will be needed for effective, efficient, and equitable delivery of either intervention. This 'Vaccine Value Profile' (VVP) for RSV is intended to provide a high-level, holistic assessment of the information and data that are currently available to inform the potential public health, economic and societal value of pipeline vaccines and vaccine-like products. This VVP was developed by a working group of subject matter experts from academia, non-profit organizations, public private partnerships and multi-lateral organizations, and in collaboration with stakeholders from the WHO headquarters. All contributors have extensive expertise on various elements of the RSV VVP and collectively aimed to identify current research and knowledge gaps. The VVP was developed using only existing and publicly available information. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Efficacious quadrivalent foot-and-mouth disease vaccine for East Africa. • Recombinant chimeric foot-and-mouth disease virus vaccine. • Foot-and-mouth disease vaccine gives cross-protection against East African strains. Foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) is a highly contagious viral disease of livestock which is prevalent across Africa, the Middle East, Asia, and South America where it has a severe economic impact on the agriculture industry. Vaccination with inactivated viral vaccines is used as the main control measure in these endemic regions of the world, however the presence of multiple serotypes, subtypes, and the continual emergence of new, antigenically divergent strains limits its effectiveness. East Africa (EA) has been identified as a region that would particularly benefit from updated FMD vaccines, since those currently in use contain older strains which do not provide good protection against contemporary strains. Four serotypes are currently circulating in EA, necessitating the development of a quadrivalent vaccine containing representative strains of each serotype. A key consideration in the selection of vaccine strains is the stability of the virus particle, since the capsids readily dissociate on exposure to elevated temperatures, but only intact capsids induce protective immunity to FMD. Therefore, with a view to producing a more stable, updated quadrivalent vaccine for EA, we recently screened a panel of foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) isolates from the region to select strains with naturally higher thermostabilities and confirmed their immunogenicity in cattle. Herein we describe the formulation and serological assessment of wild-type and recombinant quadrivalent vaccine candidates comprising these stable strains, and demonstrate that both vaccines generate high neutralising antibody titres against the homologous strains and also to heterologous strains from EA. Importantly, the vaccine passed the criteria set by the AgResults vaccine challenge project and offers good cross-protection against a panel of regional FMDV strains. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Rural areas have low human Papillomavirus vaccination rates of about 53.2 %. • Aggregation of vaccine records across providers and public health departments is needed for accurate immunization rates. • Electronic health records (EHR) can synchronize with state vaccination information systems for research to improve vaccinations. Immunization Information Systems (IIS) play an important information-sharing role at the point of care, and provide vital vaccination data for research studies and policy-makers. Previous validation studies comparing the accuracy of state registry data to health records have had mixed results. We conducted a retrospective review of EHR vaccination data for 9–17 year-old patients from 10 Oregon primary care clinics who had at least one ambulatory care visit in the past 3 years from the date of validation data collection. Data on 100 age eligible youth were captured per clinic. We compared HPV and Tdap vaccinations captured in the EHR to the Oregon ALERT IIS. All clinics were located in rural areas with both family medicine (n = 7) and pediatric (n = 3) primary care clinics. Overall agreement for HPV vaccination between EHR and ALERT IIS was 89.4 % (k = 0.83; p < 0.05). For Tdap vaccination overall agreement was 80.8 % (k = 0.60; p < 0.05). Pediatric clinics showed a higher overall vaccine agreement for both HPV at 93.3 % (k = 0.89; p < 0.05) and Tdap at 95.3 % (k = 0.90; p < 0.05). Among clinics that used bidirectional data exchange (only family medicine clinics), HPV agreement was higher at 91 % (k = 0.85) versus 88 % (k = 0.81; p < 0.05) and was lower for Tdap 75 % with bidirectional data exchange (k = 0.50) versus 86 % without bidirectional data exchange (k = 0.70; p < 0.05). When the EHR and ALERT IIS disagreed, ALERT ISS usually had additional vaccines. ALERT IIS data provides more accurate data than EHRs can provide when measuring vaccine delivery among adolescents in rural Oregon. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

FMD remains endemic in many Asian and African countries where multiple variants of serotypes O and A, among others, currently circulate. Due to lack of cross-protection between serotypes and incomplete protection between some strains even within a serotype, an important challenge for the application of effective vaccination programs is to select highly immunogenic and widely cross-reactive vaccine strains. Adaptation of a candidate field virus for use as a vaccine can be quite complex, so that whenever possible, the use of well-established vaccine viruses could have enormous advantages. FMD vaccine strains harmonized for use in South America have shown excellent results in FMD control, not only in the region, where it is still used systematically as a preventive measure, but also more recently in some Asian countries. To gain further insight into the immunogenic spectrum of these strains, VN tests (VNT) were performed with sera from cattle and/or pigs vaccinated with monovalent (type O) or trivalent (types O and A) formulations against 122 type O and 32 type A field viruses isolated from 35 countries in Asia and Africa, belonging to different lineages. Almost all VNT titers obtained were within the expected protective level, indicating the wide immunogenic spectrum of high potency FMD vaccines formulated with O 1 Campos, A24 Cruzeiro and A Argentina 2001 South American vaccine strains belonging to EURO-SA topotypes against currently active viruses from other topotypes. These in vitro results are in line with previously reported in vivo challenge tests in pigs against three A/ASIA/Sea-97 isolates and two isolates belonging to type O lineages O/SEA/Mya-98 and O/ME-SA/Ind-2001e. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Vaccination procedures can be stressful for fish and can bring severe side effects. Therefore, vaccines that can minimize the number of administrations and maximize cross-protection against multiple serotypes, genotypes, or even different species would be highly advantageous. In the present study, we investigated the cross-protective ability of two types of vaccines – viral hemorrhagic septicemia virus (VHSV) G protein-expressing DNA vaccine and G gene-deleted single-cycle VHSV genotype IVa (rVHSV-ΔG) vaccine - against both VHSV genotype Ia and infectious hematopoietic necrosis virus (IHNV) in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). The results showed that rainbow trout immunized with VHSV genotype Ia G gene- or IVa G gene-expressing DNA vaccine were significantly protected against VHSV genotype Ia, but were not protected against IHNV. In contrast to the DNA vaccine, the single-cycle VHSV IVa vaccine induced significant protection against not only VHSV Ia but also IHNV. Considering no significant increase in ELISA titer and serum neutralization activity against IHNV in fish immunized with single-cycle VHSV IVa, the protection might be independent of humoral adaptive immunity. The scarcity of cytotoxic T cell epitopes between VHSV and IHNV suggested that the possibility of involvement of cytotoxic T cell-mediated cellular adaptive immunity would be low. The role of trained immunity (innate immune memory) in cross-protection should be further investigated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Bovine ephemeral fever virus (BEFV) is a significant arthropod-borne RNA virus. • A commercial live attenuated vaccine is widely used for BEF prevention. • No recent data exist regarding this vaccine effectiveness. • We demonstrated 60 % effectiveness of this vaccine in a field controlled study. • Mortality in unvaccinated was 2.6 % (7/311) vs. 0/120 among vaccinated. Bovine ephemeral fever virus (BEFV) is a globally spread arthropod-borne RNA virus that has significant economic impacts on the cattle industry. A live attenuated commercial BEF vaccine, based on the Australian BEFV strain 919, is widely used in Israel and other countries. A previous study has suggested the high effectiveness of this vaccine (ULTRAVAC BEF VACCINE™ from Zoetis®), but anecdotal reports of high BEF morbidity among vaccinated dairy herds in Israel casted doubt on these findings. To resolve this uncertainty, a randomized controlled field vaccine effectiveness study was conducted in Israel during a BEF outbreak which occurred in 2021. Eleven dairy herds were enrolled and monitored for BEF-associated morbidity and rumination alteration patterns using electronic monitoring tags (HR Tags, SCR® Dairy, Netanya, Israel). Four of the herds were naturally infected with BEFV during the outbreak, resulting in a total of 120 vaccinated and 311 unvaccinated subjects that were included in the effectiveness study. A mixed-effect Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to calculate the overall hazard ratio between vaccinated and unvaccinated cattle. This analysis demonstrated an average vaccine effectiveness of 60 % (95 % CI = 38 %–77 %) for preventing clinical disease. In addition, a non-statistically significant trend (p = 0.1) towards protection from mortality was observed, with no observation of mortality among the vaccinated groups compared to 2.61 % mortality (7/311) among the unvaccinated subjects. One hundred and thirty vaccinated and unvaccinated calves from affected and non-affected herds and with different status of morbidity were sampled and analysed by serum-neutralization test. The highest titers of BEFV-neutralizing antibodies were found in subjects that were both vaccinated and clinically affected, indicating a booster effect after vaccination. The results of the study provide evidence for the moderate effectiveness of the ULTRAVAC BEF VACCINE™ for the prevention of BEF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

As the COVID-19 pandemic transitions into endemicity, seasonal boosters are a plausible reality across the globe. We hypothesize that intranasal vaccines can provide better protection against asymptomatic infections and more transmissible variants of SARS-CoV-2. To formulate a protective intranasal vaccine, we utilized a VLP-based platform. Hepatitis B surface antigen-based virus like particles (VLP) linked with receptor binding domain (RBD) antigen were paired with the TLR4-based agonist adjuvant, BECC 470. K18-hACE2 mice were primed and boosted at four-week intervals with either VLP-RBD-BECC or mRNA-1273. Both VLP-RBD-BECC and mRNA-1273 vaccination resulted in production of RBD-specific IgA antibodies in serum. RBD-specific IgA was also detected in the nasal wash and lung supernatants and were highest in VLP-RBD-BECC vaccinated mice. Interestingly, VLP-RBD-BECC vaccinated mice showed slightly lower levels of pre-challenge IgG responses, decreased RBD-ACE2 binding inhibition, and lower neutralizing activity in vitro than mRNA-1273 vaccinated mice. Both VLP-RBD-BECC and mRNA-1273 vaccinated mice were protected against challenge with a lethal dose of Delta variant SARS-CoV-2. Both vaccines limited viral replication and viral RNA burden in the lungs of mice. CXCL10 is a biomarker of severe SARS-CoV-2 infection and we observed both vaccines limited expression of serum and lung CXCL10. Strikingly, VLP-RBD-BECC when administered intranasally, limited lung inflammation at early timepoints that mRNA-1273 vaccination did not. VLP-RBD-BECC immunization elicited antibodies that do recognize SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant. However, VLP-RBD-BECC immunized mice were protected from Omicron challenge with low viral burden. Conversely, mRNA-1273 immunized mice had low to no detectable virus in the lungs at day 2. Together, these data suggest that VLP-based vaccines paired with BECC adjuvant can be used to induce protective mucosal and systemic responses against SARS-CoV-2. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Japanese manufacturers produce seasonal influenza vaccines of uniform formulation. • The Ministry of Health designates a single strain for each vaccine component. • The A(H3) strain selected in 2017 showed substantially low vaccine productivity. • Japan's system for strain selection has not always been beneficial for the public. • The Health Ministry reformed the scheme of vaccine strain selection in 2018. In Japan, the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW) designates one specific virus strain for each component of the quadrivalent seasonal influenza vaccine, and four domestic manufacturers produce egg-based influenza vaccines with the same formulation (inactivated, split-virus) using uniform vaccine strains. Thus, discussions of the development of effective seasonal influenza vaccines so far has focused solely on the antigenic match between the vaccine strains and epidemic viruses. However, in 2017, the Japanese selection system of vaccine viruses demonstrated that even a candidate vaccine virus that is antigenically similar to the predicted circulating viruses is not necessarily suitable for vaccine production, given lower productivity of the vaccine. Taking this experience into account, the MHLW reformed the scheme of vaccine strain selection in 2018, and instructed the Vaccine Epidemiology Research Group created by the MHLW to probe how the virus strains for the seasonal influenza vaccine should be selected in Japan. In this context, a symposium, entitled "Issues of the Present Seasonal Influenza Vaccines and Future Prospects", was held as part of the 22nd Annual Meeting of the Japanese Society for Vaccinology in 2018, and subjects related to the influenza vaccine viruses were discussed among relevant administrators, manufacturers, and researchers. This report summarizes the presentations given at that symposium in order to convey the present scheme of vaccine virus selection, the evaluation of the resulting vaccines, and the efforts at new vaccine formulation in Japan. Notably, from March 2022, the MHLW has launched a discussion of the merits of the seasonal influenza vaccines produced by foreign manufacturers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Most seasonal influenza vaccines are produced using hemagglutinin (HA) surface antigens from inactivated virions. However, virions are thought to be a suboptimal source for the less abundant neuraminidase (NA) surface antigen, which is also protective against severe disease. Here, we demonstrate that inactivated influenza virions are compatible with two modern approaches for improving protective antibody responses against NA. Using a DBA/2J mouse model, we show that the strong infection-induced NA inhibitory (NAI) antibody responses are only achieved by high dose immunizations of inactivated virions, likely due to the low viral NA content. Based on this observation, we first produced virions with higher NA content by using reverse genetics to exchange the viral internal gene segments. Single immunizations with these inactivated virions showed enhanced NAI antibody responses and improved NA-based protection from a lethal viral challenge while also allowing for the development of natural immunity to the heterotypic challenge virus HA. Second, we combined inactivated virions with recombinant NA protein antigens. These combination vaccines increased NA-based protection following viral challenge and elicited stronger antibody responses against NA than either component alone, especially when the NAs possessed similar antigenicity. Together, these results indicate that inactivated virions are a flexible platform that can be easily combined with protein-based vaccines to improve protective antibody responses against influenza antigens. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Chikungunya, a mosquito-borne viral disease caused by the chikungunya virus (CHIKV), causes a significant global health burden, and there is currently no approved vaccine to prevent chikungunya disease. In this study, the safety and immunogenicity of a CHIKV mRNA vaccine candidate (mRNA-1388) were evaluated in healthy participants in a CHIKV-nonendemic region. This phase 1, first-in-human, randomized, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study enrolled healthy adults (ages 18–49 years) between July 2017 and March 2019 in the United States. Participants were randomly assigned (3:1) to receive 2 intramuscular injections 28 days apart with mRNA-1388 in 3 dose-level groups (25 μg, 50 μg, and 100 μg) or placebo and were followed for up to 1 year. Safety (unsolicited adverse events [AEs]), tolerability (local and systemic reactogenicity; solicited AEs), and immunogenicity (geometric mean titers [GMTs] of CHIKV neutralizing and binding antibodies) of mRNA-1388 versus placebo were evaluated. Sixty participants were randomized and received ≥ 1 vaccination; 54 (90 %) completed the study. mRNA-1388 demonstrated favorable safety and reactogenicity profiles at all dose levels. Immunization with mRNA-1388 induced substantial and persistent humoral responses. Dose-dependent increases in neutralizing antibody titers were observed; GMTs (95 % confidence intervals [CIs]) at 28 days after dose 2 were 6.2 (5.1–7.6) for mRNA-1388 25 μg, 53.8 (26.8–108.1) for mRNA-1388 50 μg, 92.8 (43.6–197.6) for mRNA-1388 100 μg, and 5.0 (not estimable) for placebo. Persistent humoral responses were observed up to 1 year after vaccination and remained higher than placebo in the 2 higher mRNA-1388 dose groups. The development of CHIKV-binding antibodies followed a similar trend as that observed with neutralizing antibodies. mRNA-1388, the first mRNA vaccine against CHIKV, was well tolerated and elicited substantial and long-lasting neutralizing antibody responses in healthy adult participants in a nonendemic region. ClinicalTrials.gov : NCT03325075. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Emerging avian influenza viruses pose a high risk to poultry production, necessitating the need for more broadly protective vaccines. Live attenuated influenza vaccines offer excellent protective efficacies but their use in poultry farms is discouraged due to safety concerns related to emergence of reassortant viruses. Vaccination of chicken embryos inside eggs (in ovo) induces early immunity in young chicks while reduces the safety concerns related to the use of live vaccines on farms. However, in ovo vaccination using influenza viruses severely affects the egg hatchability. We previously engineered a high interferon-inducing live attenuated influenza vaccine candidate with an enhanced protective efficacy in chickens. Here, we asked whether we could further modify this high interferon-inducing vaccine candidate to develop an in ovo -compatible live attenuated influenza vaccine. We first showed that the enhanced interferon responses induced by the vaccine is not enough to attenuate the virus in ovo. To reduce the pathogenicity of the virus for chicken embryos, we replaced the hemagglutinin cleavage site of the H7 vaccine virus (PENPKTR/GL) with that of the H6-subtype viruses (PQIETR/GL) and disrupted the ribosomal frameshifting site responsible for viral polymerase acidic X protein expression. In ovo vaccination of chickens with up to 105 median egg infectious dose of the modified vaccine had minimal effects on hatchability while protecting the chickens against a heterologous challenge virus at two weeks of age. This study demonstrates that targeted genetic mutations can be applied to further attenuate and enhance the safety of live attenuated influenza vaccines to develop future in ovo vaccines for poultry. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Seroprotection from HAV vaccine was not impaired by coadministration with TAK-003. • Immunogenicity of TAK-003 was not impacted by coadministration with HAV vaccine. • Both vaccines, alone or concomitantly, were well tolerated by trial participants. • Overall, these results support the coadministration of HAV vaccine and TAK-003. Vaccination against hepatitis A virus (HAV) is largely recommended for travelers worldwide. Concurrent dengue and HAV vaccination may be desired in parallel for travelers to countries where both diseases are endemic. This randomized, observer-blind, phase 3 trial evaluated coadministration of HAV vaccine with tetravalent dengue vaccine (TAK-003) in healthy adults aged 18–60 years living in the UK. Participants were randomized (1:1:1) to receive HAV vaccine and placebo on Day 1, and placebo on Day 90 (Group 1), TAK-003 and placebo on Day 1, and TAK-003 on Day 90 (Group 2), or TAK-003 and HAV vaccine on Day 1, and TAK-003 on Day 90 (Group 3). The primary objective was non-inferiority of HAV seroprotection rate (anti-HAV ≥ 12.5 mIU/mL) in Group 3 versus Group 1, one month post-first vaccination (Day 30) in HAV-naïve and dengue-naïve participants. Sensitivity analyses were performed on combinations of baseline HAV and dengue serostatus. Secondary objectives included dengue seropositivity one month post-second vaccination (Day 120), HAV geometric mean concentrations (GMCs), and safety. 900 participants were randomized. On Day 30, HAV seroprotection rates were non-inferior following coadministration of HAV and TAK-003 (Group 3: 98.7 %) to HAV administration alone (Group 1: 97.1 %; difference: −1.68, 95 % CI: −8.91 to 4.28). Sensitivity analyses including participants who were neither HAV-naïve nor DENV-naïve at baseline supported this finding. Anti-HAV GMCs on Day 30 were 82.1 (95 % CI: 62.9–107.1) mIU/mL in Group 1 and 93.0 (76.1–113.6) mIU/mL in Group 3. By Day 120, 90.9–96.8 % of TAK-003 recipients were seropositive (neutralizing antibody titer > 10) to all four dengue serotypes. Coadministration of HAV vaccine and TAK-003 was well tolerated, with no important safety risks identified. Immune responses following coadministration of HAV vaccine and TAK-003 were non-inferior to administration of HAV vaccine alone. The results support the coadministration of HAV vaccine and TAK-003 with no adverse impact on immunogenicity, safety, and reactogenicity of either vaccine. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT03525119. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Our case series identifies the BBIBP-CorV and the AZD1222 vaccines as potential triggers for CNS demyelination. • Vaccination may lead to demyelination disease. • More studies especially RCTs are required to determine if COVID-19 vaccines actually stimulate acute CNS demyelination. Several reports have been documented in possible association with the administration of different severe acute respiratory coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccines and central nervous system (CNS)demyelinating disorders, specifically post mRNA vaccines. We report twelve cases of developing Multiple sclerosis (MS) or Neuromyelitis Optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) following neither the first nor second dose of inactivated or viral vector COVID-19 vaccine. We retrospectively compiled twelve patients' medical information with a new onset of MS or NMOSD in their first six weeks following a COVID-19 vaccine. We report twelve cases of MS (n = 9), clinically isolated syndrome (CIS)(n = 1), and NMOSD (n = 2) following COVID-19 inactivated vaccines (n = 11) or viral vector vaccines (n = 1), within some days following either the first (n = 3), second dose (n = 8), or third dose (n = 1). Their median age was 33.3 years, ranging from 19 to 53 years. Ten were women (83 %). All patients fully (n = 5) or partially (n = 2) recovered after receiving 3 doses of Corticosteroids. Common medications were Natalizumab, Teriflunomide, Dimethyl fumarate, and Rituximab. Also, Interferon beta 1-a was administered to one patient with severe symptoms of numbness. Our case series identifies the Sinopharm BBIBP-CorV and the AstraZeneca AZD1222 vaccines as potential triggers for CNS demyelinating diseases. Vaccine administration routines are not affected by these rare and coincidental events. However, these manifestations are not deniable and require serious attention. Further investigations are needed to clarify the actual mechanisms and real associations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Misinformation correctives can cause harm even when they improve belief accuracy. • Saying "mRNA vaccines don't contain live virus" made live virus vaccines seem risky. • This "collateral damage effect" was stronger for people with low vaccine acceptance. • Collateral damage was avoided by addressing implicit content and contextual cues. • It should be standard practice to examine adverse effects before using correctives. Amid the COVID-19 pandemic, the scientific community has been understandably eager to combat misinformation about issues such as vaccine safety. In highly polarized information environments, however, even well-intentioned messages have the potential to produce adverse effects. In this study, we connect different disciplinary strands of social science to derive and experimentally test the novel hypothesis that although particular efforts to debunk misinformation about mRNA vaccines will reduce relevant misperceptions about that technology, these correctives will harm attitudes toward other types of vaccines. We refer to this as the "collateral damage hypothesis." Our study specifically examines a corrective message stating that "mRNA vaccines do not contain live virus," and our results offer some support for our hypothesis, with the corrective triggering increased societal risk perceptions of live vaccines. We also find that the effect is, predictably, most evident among those whose vaccine acceptance is low. Building on the theoretical grounding we outline, we test a "damage control" adjustment to the corrective message and present evidence supporting that it mitigates the collateral damage. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Neurovirulence, viscerotropism and immunogenicity were evaluated in monkeys. • Neurovirulence and viscerotropism scores were lower than Stamaril. • Complete seroconversion was observed by day 14 post inoculation. • Clinical and histological scores were comparable with WHO reference virus 168/73. Yellow fever vaccine associated neurovirulence and viscerotropism have been reported by various countries. In this study, the neurovirulence, viscerotropism and immunogenicity of yellow fever vaccine seed lots (master and working) and final product manufactured at Serum Institute of India (SII) were evaluated in cynomolgus monkeys. WHO reference virus 168-73 and Stamaril™ as a control vaccine was used for comparison. Neurovirulence and viscerotropism scores of the seed lots and final product were lower than Stamaril™. The SII seed virus and vaccine complies to the WHO requirement for neurovirulence, viscerotropism and immunogenicity, when tested in comparison to WHO reference seed virus 168/73. All challenged animals showed 100 % seroconversion as early as day 14 and neutralizing antibody titers were sustainable at day 30 in all animals. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The recent wave of COVID-19 cases has led to the potential need for booster doses. We surveyed 6,294 people and found that 87.6% reported willingness to take a booster dose, with vaccine efficacy rate being the most common reason cited to accept booster dose. Differences in acceptance rates were noted among those working in non-health related sectors, different ethnic groups as well as those who had taken viral vector vaccines. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Though widely applied in other epidemiological fields, the case-cohort study design has seen little application in the field of vaccinology. Case-cohort studies use probabilistic sampling and reweighting to draw inferences about effects (in this case vaccine efficacy) at the population level in an efficient manner. The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic was met with high vaccine uptake, and high rates of population testing prior to the emergence of Omicron variants of concern, in Ontario, Canada, providing an ideal environment for application of case-cohort methodology. We combined a population-based case line list and vaccination database for the province of Ontario between December 2020 and October 2021. Risk of infection after vaccination was evaluated in all laboratory-confirmed vaccinated SARS-CoV-2 cases, and a 2 % sample of vaccinated controls, evaluated using survival analytic methods, including construction of Cox proportional hazards models. Vaccination status was treated as a time-varying covariate. First and second doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine markedly reduced risk of infection (first dose efficacy 68 %, 95 % CI 67 %–69 %; second dose efficacy 88 %, 95 % CI 87–88 %). In multivariable models, extended dosing intervals were associated with lowest risk of breakthrough infection (HR for redosing 0.64 (95 % CI 0.61–0.67) at 6–8 weeks). Heterologous vaccine schedules that mixed viral vector vaccine first doses with mRNA second doses were significantly more effective than mRNA only vaccines. Risk of infection largely vanished during the time period 4–6 months after the second vaccine dose, but rose markedly thereafter. We conclude that a case-cohort design provided an efficient means to identify strong protective effects associated with SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in real time, and also served to quantify the timing and magnitude of infection breakthrough risk in the same cohort. Heterologous vaccination and extended dosing intervals improved the durability of immune response. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• We evaluated people with suspected hypersensitivity after COVID-19 vaccination. • 92% of 180 referred for hypersensitivity reactions were recommended for revaccination. • 85% with physician-diagnosed hypersensitivity had no recurrent symptoms after revaccination. • Patients with COVID-19 vaccine hypersensitivity reactions can be safely revaccinated. COVID-19 vaccination has been associated with anaphylaxis and hypersensitivity reactions. Infectious disease physicians and allergists in the Canadian Special Immunization Clinic (SIC) Network developed guidance for evaluating patients with adverse events following immunization (AEFI) including suspected hypersensitivity. This study evaluated management and adverse event recurrence following subsequent COVID-19 vaccinations. Individuals aged 12 years and older enrolled at participating SICs before February 28, 2023 who were referred for suspected or diagnosed hypersensitivity reaction following COVID-19 vaccination, or for prevaccination assessment of suspected allergy to a COVID-19 vaccine component were included. De-identified clinical assessments and revaccination data, captured in a centralized database, were analyzed. The Brighton Collaboration case definition (BCCD) for anaphylaxis (2023 version) was applied. The analysis included 206 participants from 13 sites: 26 participants referred for pre-vaccination assessment and 180 participants referred for adverse events following COVID-19 vaccination (15/180 [8.3%] with BCCD confirmed anaphylaxis, 84 [46.7%] with immediate hypersensitivity symptoms not meeting BCCD, 33 [18.3%] with other diagnosed hypersensitivity reactions, and 48 [26.7%] participants with a final diagnosis of non-hypersensitivity AEFI). Among participants referred for AEFIs following COVID-19 vaccination, 166/180 (92.2%) were recommended for COVID-19 revaccination after risk assessment, of whom 158/166 (95.2%) were revaccinated (all with a COVID-19 mRNA vaccine). After revaccination, 1/15 (6.7%) participants with prior anaphylaxis, 1/77 (1.3%) with immediate hypersensitivity not meeting criteria for anaphylaxis and 1/24 (4.2%) with other physician diagnosed hypersensitivity developed recurrent AEFI symptoms that met the BCCD for anaphylaxis. All 26 participants referred pre-vaccination, including 9 (34.6%) with history of polyethylene glycol-asparaginase reactions, were vaccinated without occurrence of immediate hypersensitivity symptoms. Most individuals in this national cohort who experienced a hypersensitivity event following COVID-19 vaccination and were referred for specialist review were revaccinated without AEFI recurrence, suggesting that specialist evaluation can facilitate safe revaccination. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We established a qualified Madin-Darby canine kidney cell line (qMDCK-Cs) and investigated its suitability for source virus isolation to develop cell-based seasonal influenza vaccine viruses using vaccine manufacturer cells (Manuf-Cs). When inoculated with 81 influenza-positive clinical specimens, the initial virus isolation efficiency of qMDCK-Cs was exceeded 70%. Among the qMDCK-C isolates, 100% of the A/H1N1pdm09, B/Victoria and B/Yamagata strains and >70% of the A/H3N2 strains showed antigenicity equivalent to that of the contemporary vaccine or relevant viruses in haemagglutination inhibition (HI) or virus neutralization (VN) tests using ferret antisera. These qMDCK-C isolates were propagated in Manuf-Cs (MDCK and Vero cells) (Manuf-C viruses) to develop vaccine viruses. In reciprocal antigenicity tests, ferret antisera raised against corresponding reference viruses and Manuf-C viruses recognized 29 of 31 Manuf-C viruses and corresponding reference viruses, respectively at HI or VN titres more than half of the homologous virus titres, which is the antigenicity criterion for cell culture seasonal influenza vaccine viruses specified by the World Health Organization. Furthermore, ferret antisera against these Manuf-C viruses recognized ≥95% of the viruses circulating during the relevant influenza season with HI or VN titres greater than one-quarter of the homologous virus titres. No cell line-specific amino acid substitutions were observed in the resulting viruses. However, polymorphisms at positions 158/160 of H3HA, 148/151 of N2NA and 197/199 of B/Victoria HA were occasionally detected in the qMDCK-C and Manuf-C viruses but barely affected the viral antigenicity. These results indicated that qMDCK-Cs are suitable for isolating influenza viruses that can serve as a source of antigenically appropriate vaccine viruses. The use of the qMDCK-C isolates will eliminates the need for clinical sample collection, virus isolation, and antigenicity analysis every season, and is expected to contribute to the promotion of vaccine virus development using manufacturer cells. • NIID-MDCK cells are suitable for initial isolation of seasonal influenza viruses. • Suitability of NIID-MDCK-C isolates to develop cell-based vaccine viruses. • Development of antigenically appropriate cell-based vaccine viruses. • Polymorphic cell adaptive mutation did not affect the antigenicity of the virus. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Heterologous Covid-19 vaccination strategies arose due to interruption of vaccination programs plus delay and shortage of vaccine supplies. We analysed neutralizing response against ancestral SARS-CoV-2 B.1 and P.1, C.37 and B.1.67.2 variants elicited by 16 homologous and heterologous protocols combining Gam-COVID-Vac, ChAdOx1-S, Ad5-nCorV, BBIBP-CorV and mRNA-1273 vaccines. Homologous mRNA-1273 and heterologous schemes of a non-replicative viral vector/inactivated virus-based vaccine combined with mRNA-1273 induced significantly broader and greater neutralizing antibody-response. Moreover, serum from participants vaccinated with combinations of ChAdOx1-S/Ad5-nCorV and BBIBP-CorV/non-replicative viral vector-based vaccines showed higher or equivalent neutralizing response compared to homologous protocols, pointing them as good alternative platforms. BBIBP-CorV used as second dose exhibited significantly lower neutralizing response compared to other protocols, demonstrating that it should not be recommended as second dose. The information provided herein is valuable to redesign vaccination strategies, especially for low-income countries that still struggle with low percentages of immunized populations and vaccine supply shortage. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

[Display omitted] Vaccine development is a complex process, starting with selection of a promising immunogen in the discovery phase, followed by process development in the preclinical phase, and later by clinical trials in tandem with process improvements and scale up. A large suite of analytical techniques is required to gain understanding of the vaccine candidate so that a relevant immunogen is selected and subsequently manufactured consistently throughout the lifespan of the product. For viral vaccines, successful immunogen production is contingent on its maintained antigenicity and/or infectivity, as well as the ability to characterize these qualities within the context of the process, formulation, and clinical performance. In this report we show the utility of flow virometry during preclinical development of a Covid 19 vaccine candidate based on SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) protein expressed on vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV). Using a panel of monoclonal antibodies, we were able to detect the S protein on the surface of the recombinant VSV virus, monitor the expression levels, detect differences in the antigen based on S protein sequence and after virus inactivation, and monitor S protein stability. Collectively, flow virometry provided important data that helped to guide preclinical development of this vaccine candidate. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Foot-and-mouth disease (FMD), a viral infection affecting cloven-hoofed animals, persists as an endemic challenge worldwide, causing significant economic losses. Vaccination is a pivotal strategy for disease control, especially in endemic regions where it may be the sole option. In FMD-free countries, "vaccination to cull" strategies are increasingly considered to prevent disease spread. Concurrently, the coexistence of FMD with other animal diseases in endemic regions raises the prospect of simultaneous or combined administration of multiple vaccines for cost, labor, and animal welfare benefits. We conducted a narrative review to investigate the positive or negative effects of concurrent FMD vaccination with other viral and bacterial vaccines. For this purpose, the literature is organized chronologically. Duplicate sources were eliminated, and older sources without sufficient data were excluded. Studies only those targeting the specific species were included. This comprehensive review synthesizes findings from over 50 years of research, offering insights applicable in the ongoing fight against endemic diseases and inspiring innovative approaches., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Inactivated viral vaccines have long been used in humans for diseases of global health threat (e.g., poliomyelitis and pandemic and seasonal influenza) and the technology of inactivation has more recently been used for emerging diseases such as West Nile, Chikungunya, Ross River, SARS and especially for COVID-19. The Brighton Collaboration Benefit-Risk Assessment of VAccines by TechnolOgy (BRAVATO) Working Group has prepared standardized templates to describe the key considerations for the benefit and risk of several vaccine platform technologies, including inactivated viral vaccines. This paper uses the BRAVATO inactivated virus vaccine template to review the features of an inactivated whole chikungunya virus (CHIKV) vaccine that has been evaluated in several preclinical studies and clinical trials. The inactivated whole CHIKV vaccine was cultured on Vero cells and inactivated by ß-propiolactone. This provides an effective, flexible system for high-yield manufacturing. The inactivated whole CHIKV vaccine has favorable thermostability profiles, compatible with vaccine supply chains. Safety data are compiled in the current inactivated whole CHIKV vaccine safety database with unblinded data from the ongoing studies: 850 participants from phase II study (parts A and B) outside of India, and 600 participants from ongoing phase II study in India, and completed phase I clinical studies for 60 subjects. Overall, the inactivated whole CHIKV vaccine has been well tolerated, with no significant safety issues identified. Evaluation of the inactivated whole CHIKV vaccine is continuing, with 1410 participants vaccinated as of 20 April 2022. Extensive evaluation of immunogenicity in humans shows strong, durable humoral immune responses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We studied 2780 adults in Hong Kong who received CoronaVac inactivated virus vaccine (Sinovac) and BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine ("Comirnaty", BioNTech/Fosun Pharma). We compared rates of antibody waning over time using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for spike receptor binding domain and a surrogate virus neutralization test. We found stronger and more durable antibody responses to two doses of the mRNA vaccine, and slightly stronger initial antibody responses to each vaccine in younger adults and women. The weaker and less durable responses following CoronaVac support earlier provision of third doses to persons who previously received two doses of this vaccine. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Despite the development of prophylactic anti-malarial drugs and practices to prevent infection, malaria remains a health concern. Preclinical testing of novel malaria vaccine strategies achieved through rational antigen selection and novel particle-based delivery platforms is yielding encouraging results. One such platform, self-assembling virus-like particles (VLP) is safer than attenuated live viruses, and has been approved as a vaccination tool by the FDA. We explore the use of Norovirus sub-viral particles lacking the natural shell (S) domain forming the interior shell but that retain the protruding (P) structures of the native virus as a vaccine vector. Epitope selection and their surface display has the potential to focus antigen specific immune responses to crucial epitopes. Recombinant P-particles displaying epitopes from two malaria antigens, Plasmodium falciparum (Pf) CelTOS and Plasmodium falciparum (Pf) CSP, were evaluated for immunogenicity and their ability to confer protection in a murine challenge model. Immune responses induced in mice resulted either in sterile protection (displaying PfCelTOS epitopes) or in antibodies with functional activity against sporozoites (displaying PfCSP epitopes) in an in vitro liver-stage development assay (ILSDA). These results are encouraging and support further evaluation of this platform as a vaccine delivery system. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) was first reported in December 2019, China and later it was found that the causative microorganism is severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). As on 3rd June 2021, SARS-CoV-2 has affected 171049741 people worldwide with 3549710 deaths. Nanomedicine such as nanoparticles, liposomes, lipid nanoparticles, virus-like nanoparticles offer tremendous hopes to treat viral infections including COVID-19. Most importantly target specific ligands can be attached on the surface of them and this makes them more target specific and the loaded drug can be delivered to cellular and molecular level. These properties of nanomedicines can be utilized to deliver drugs or vaccines to treat viral diseases including SARS-CoV-2 infection. This review discusses about SARS-CoV-2 and the potential application of nanomedicines for delivering biological macromolecules like vaccines and drugs for treating COVID-19. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The current WHO Recommendations to assure the quality, safety and efficacy of live attenuated yellow fever vaccines were adopted in 2010. This document recommends that vaccine virus master and working seed lots should be tested for viscerotropism, immunogenicity and neurovirulence in monkeys. A vaccine manufacturer has reported, recently, discrepancies on the clinical scoring of monkeys during assessment of working seed lots and suggested aligning neurotropism assessment of yellow fever vaccines virus seed lots with that of neurovirulence testing of polio vaccines virus seed lots. In this approach, clinical signs are recorded but do not form part of the assessment or pass/fail criteria. At its 71st meeting in August 2020, the ECBS agreed to establish a drafting group and to consult with manufacturers and other stakeholders on the proposed amendment. Then a survey had been conducted to seek opinions of stakeholders on the neurotropism testing and revision of current WHO Recommendations for yellow fever vaccines. It was recognized from the answers of the survey that the test for neurovirulence in monkeys presents several technical challenges which could be addressed in the amended version of the Recommendations. On 18–19 March 2021, a virtual WHO working group meeting was held to discuss a proposed draft of the amended text with participants of yellow fever vaccine manufacturers and relevant regulators. Overall, there was a consensus among manufacturers and regulators that clinical evaluation provides important information and should be retained as part of the neurotropism test. However, there was also agreement that the test is somewhat subjective, and that analysis can be difficult. It was recognized that there was potential for improvement in both test execution and analysis to increase harmonization between manufacturers. Alternative tests to the non-human primates neurovirulence test would be useful but it was agreed that none seem to be sufficiently developed at present. Based on these working group discussions, it was proposed that the appendix on neurotropism test to be further revised by the WHO drafting group and submitted to ECBS for review and adoption. Issues other than neurotropism test were discussed in the meeting as well. There were a number of points identified during the meeting, such as new platform of production, animal models, deep sequencing, international standards, that are outside the current recommendations that are worthy of further discussion. Therefore, it is recommended that there would be a future meeting with various stakeholders to discuss the potential revision of the whole Recommendations for yellow fever vaccines in order to meet the current needs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Hand, foot and mouth disease (HFMD) is frequently caused by enterovirus 71 (EV71) • HFMD is emerging as a major public health concern in the Asia-Pacific region. • TAK-021 is a candidate inactivated virus vaccine based on EV71 B2 sub-genogroup. • SCARB2-transgenic (SCARB2-tg) mice are susceptible to infection by multiple EV71 sub-genogroups. • TAK-021 is immunogenic and can protect against heterologous EV71 sub-genogroups in SCARB2-tg mice. Enterovirus 71 (EV71) is a major cause of outbreaks of hand, foot and mouth disease, most frequently in children, and is a public health concern in the Asia-Pacific region. Takeda is developing TAK-021, an inactivated EV71 vaccine candidate based on sub-genogroup B2 strain MS87. In a phase I clinical trial, TAK-021 was safe, well tolerated, and immunogenic in healthy adults and elicited cross-neutralizing antibodies against heterologous EV71 sub-genogroup viruses. TAK-021 confers protection from lethal challenge with a mouse-adapted homologous strain in AG129 mice. However, it has not been determined whether TAK-021 can provide cross-protection against heterologous EV71 sub-genogroups. We examined the efficacy of TAK-021 against challenge with EV71 sub-genogroups B4, B5, C1, C2, and C4 on day 42 (short-term) and sub-genogroups B5 and C4 on day 120 (long-term) after immunization of human scavenger receptor B2 transgenic (hSCARB2-tg) mice with TAK-021 on days 0 and 28. Antibody titers were monitored over 120 days using plaque reduction neutralization test of the homologous vaccine virus. TAK-021 elicited neutralizing antibody (nAb) in greater than 90% of the mice and nAb persisted through day 120. Challenge of control animals led to weight loss and death, as well as virus detection in various organs and histopathological lesions in the brain. All mice that received two doses of TAK-021 developed nAb and survived a short-term challenge given on day 42, while more than 80% survived a long-term challenge given on day 120. EV71 was detected less frequently and at lower levels in organs of immunized mice compared to non-immunized control mice. The results show that TAK-021 can confer protection in mice against the EV71 sub-genogroups tested. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• We quantified the effect of the VOC and waning on vaccine and infection-acquired immunity (VE). • VE against infectiousness (VEi) and susceptibility (VEs) was significant against Alpha and Delta. • Delta was associated with increased transmission and reduced VE, especially VEi. • Vaccine-induced immunity waned faster than hybrid immunity. During the first half of 2021, we observed high vaccine effectiveness (VE) against SARS-CoV2-infection. The replacement of the alpha-'variant of concern' (VOC) by the delta-VOC and uncertainty about the time course of immunity called for a re-assessment. We estimated VE against transmission of infection (VET) from Belgian contact tracing data for high-risk exposure contacts between 26/01/2021 and 14/12/2021 by susceptibility (VEs) and infectiousness of breakthrough cases (VEi) for a complete schedule of Ad26.COV2.S, ChAdOx1, BNT162b2, mRNA-1273 as well as infection-acquired and hybrid immunity. We used a multilevel Bayesian model and adjusted for personal characteristics (age, sex, household), background exposure, calendar week, VOC and time since immunity conferring-event. VET-estimates were higher for mRNA-vaccines, over 90%, compared to viral vector vaccines: 66% and 80% for Ad26COV2.S and ChAdOx1 respectively (Alpha, 0–50 days after vaccination). Delta was associated with a 40% increase in odds of transmission and a decrease of VEs (72–64%) and especially of VEi (71–46% for BNT162b2). Infection-acquired and hybrid immunity were less affected by Delta. Waning further reduced VET-estimates: from 81% to 63% for BNT162b2 (Delta, 150–200 days after vaccination). We observed lower initial VEi in the age group 65–84 years (32% vs 46% in the age group 45–64 years for BNT162b2) and faster waning. Hybrid immunity waned slower than vaccine-induced immunity. VEi and VEs-estimates, while remaining significant, were reduced by Delta and waned over time. We observed faster waning in the oldest age group. We should seek to improve vaccine-induced protection in older persons and those vaccinated with viral-vector vaccines. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

[Display omitted] • >1.5 billion doses of BBIBP-CorV COVID-19 vaccine have been delivered worldwide. • However, its effectiveness has not been studied in the real-world setting. • We report its success in averting severe disease & death by 92 & 97%, respectively. • This inactivated viral vaccine is highly effective, but only in a 2-dose schedule. • Lack of effective protection with the single dose needs further studies. This is a community-based, retrospective, observational study conducted to determine effectiveness of the BBIBP-CorV inactivated vaccine in the real-world setting against hospital admissions and death. Study participants were selected from 214,940 PCR-positive cases of COVID-19 reported to the Department of Health, Abu Dhabi Emirate, United Arab Emirates (UAE) between September 01, 2020 and May 1, 2021. Of these, 176,640 individuals were included in the study who were aged ≥ 15 years with confirmed COVID-19 positive status who had records linked to their vaccination status. Those with incomplete or missing records were excluded (n = 38,300). Study participants were divided into three groups depending upon their vaccination status: fully vaccinated (two doses), partially vaccinated (single dose), and non-vaccinated. Study outcomes included COVID-19-related admissions to hospital general and critical care wards and death. Vaccine effectiveness for each outcome was based on the incidence density per 1000 person-years. The fully-, partially- and non-vaccinated groups included 62,931, 21,768 and 91,941 individuals, respectively. Based on the incidence rate ratios, the vaccine effectiveness in fully vaccinated individuals was 80%, 92%, and 97% in preventing COVID-19-related hospital admissions, critical care admissions, and death, respectively, when compared to the non-vaccinated group. No protection was observed for critical and non-critical care hospital admissions for the partially vaccinated group, while some protection against death was apparent, although statistically insignificant. In a COVID-19 pandemic, use of the Sinopharm BBIBP-CorV inactivated vaccine is effective in preventing severe disease and death in a two-dose regimen. Lack of protection with the single dose may be explained by insufficient seroconversion and/or neutralizing antibody responses, behavioral factors (i.e., false sense of protection), and/or other biological factors (emergence of variants, possibility of reinfection, duration of vaccine protection, etc.). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Long-term protection following nasal vaccination in teleosts has not previously been evaluated. • Intranasal (I.N.) vaccination was shown to be safe to at least 12 mo post-vaccination in rainbow trout" • I.P. but not I.N. delivery of ERM bacterin induced significant protection 6 mo post-vaccination. • I.N.-vaccinated fish with live attenuated IHNV vaccine showed the lowest mortality 6 mo post-vaccination. • Spleen repertoire analyses confirmed unique expansions of VH-JH rearrangements depending on the vaccine and delivery route. Previous research demonstrated that bacterial and viral vaccines delivered via the nasal route in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) at 7 and 28 days post-vaccination are highly protective (>95% protection). Long-term protection following nasal vaccination in teleosts has not been evaluated. The goal of this study was to assess efficacy and immune responses at 6 months (mo) post-vaccination (mpv), and long-lasting immune responses at 12 mpv of two different vaccines: an inactivated enteric red mouth disease (ERM) Yersinia ruckeri bacterin and a live attenuated infectious hematopoietic necrosis virus (IHNV) vaccine. Juvenile rainbow trout were vaccinated for Y. ruckeri via intraperitoneal (I.P.) and intranasal (I.N.) routes, and for IHNV by intramuscular (I.M.) and I.N. routes, then challenged at 6 mpv. Immune responses were determined at 6 and 12 mpv. ERM vaccine I.P. delivery elicited significantly higher serum IgM-specific titers that remained elevated compared to mock-vaccinated fish at 6 mpv. By 12 mpv, antibody titers to Y. ruckeri were not significantly different across all treatments. Following Y. ruckeri challenge at 6 mpv, a significant difference in cumulative percent mortality (CPM) was found for I.P.-vaccinated fish but not I.N.-vaccinated fish. I.M. and I.N. vaccination with live attenuated IHNV did not result in significant specific serum IgM titers at 6 or 12 mpv. Yet, I.N.-vaccinated fish showed the lowest CPM 6 mpv indicating long-term protection that does not correlate with systemic IgM responses. Repertoire analyses confirmed unique expansions of VH-JH rearrangements in the spleen of rainbow trout 12 mpv that varied with the type of vaccine and route of vaccination. Combined, these data demonstrate that I.N. vaccination with a live attenuated viral vaccine confers long lasting protection, but I.N. ERM vaccination does not and booster before 6 mpv is recommended. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

rVSV-Spike (rVSV-S) is a recombinant viral vaccine candidate under development to control the COVID-19 pandemic and is currently in phase II clinical trials. rVSV-S induces neutralizing antibodies and protects against SARS-CoV-2 infection in animal models. Bringing rVSV-S to clinical trials required the development of a scalable downstream process for the production of rVSV-S that can meet regulatory guidelines. The objective of this study was the development of the first downstream unit operations for cell-culture-derived rVSV-S, namely, the removal of nucleic acid contamination, the clarification and concentration of viral harvested supernatant, and buffer exchange. Retaining the infectivity of the rVSV-S during the downstream process was challenged by the shear sensitivity of the enveloped rVSV-S and its membrane protruding spike protein. Through a series of screening experiments, we evaluated and established the required endonuclease treatment conditions, filter train composition, and hollow fiber-tangential flow filtration parameters to remove large particles, reduce the load of impurities, and concentrate and exchange the buffer while retaining rVSV-S infectivity. The combined effect of the first unit operations on viral recovery and the removal of critical impurities was examined during scale-up experiments. Overall, approximately 40% of viral recovery was obtained and the regulatory requirements of less than 10 ng host cell DNA per dose were met. However, while 86–97% of the host cell proteins were removed, the regulatory acceptable HCP levels were not achieved, requiring subsequent purification and polishing steps. The results we obtained during the scale-up experiments were similar to those obtained during the screening experiments, indicating the scalability of the process. The findings of this study set the foundation for the development of a complete downstream manufacturing process, requiring subsequent purification and polishing unit operations for clinical preparations of rVSV-S. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Sq + Al-adjuvanted IV is a safe and non-invasive vaccine formulation. • The formulated vaccine can be delivered via either IP or IM route in olive flounder. • It showed persistency for 17–24 wpv at the injection site without causing side effects. • It provides both short- and long-term protective immunity in flounder against VHSV. • The study recommends IM vaccination in small-sized fish and IP vaccination in table-sized fish. The profitability of the olive flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus) aquaculture industry in Korea depends on high production and maintenance of flesh quality, as consumers prefer to eat raw flounders from aquaria and relish the raw muscles as 'sashimi'. For sustaining high production, easy-to-deliver and efficient vaccination strategies against serious pathogens, such as viral hemorrhagic septicemia virus (VHSV), is very important as it cause considerable losses to the industry. Whereas, a safe and non-invasive vaccine formulation that is free from unacceptable side-effects and does not devalue the fish is needed to maintain flesh quality. We previously developed a squalene–aluminium hydroxide (Sq + Al) adjuvanted VHSV vaccine that conferred moderate to high protection in flounder, without causing any side effects when administered through the intraperitoneal (IP) injection route. However, farmers often demand intramuscular (IM) injection vaccines as they are relatively easy to administer in small fishes. Therefore, we administered the developed vaccine via IP and IM routes and investigated the safety and persistency of the vaccine at the injection site. In addition, we conducted a comparative analysis of vaccine efficacy and serum antibody response. The clinical and histological observation of the IM and IP groups showed that our vaccine remained persistence at the injection sites for 10–17 weeks post vaccination (wpv), without causing any adverse effects to the fish. The relative percentage of survival were 100% and 71.4% for the IP group and 88.9% and 92.3% for the IM group at 3 and 17 wpv, respectively. Thus, considering the persistency period (24 wpv) and both short and long-term efficacy of our vaccine, the present study offers an option to flounder farmers in selecting either IM or IP delivery strategy according to their cultured fish size and harvesting schedule — IM vaccination for small-sized fish and IP vaccination for table-sized fish. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Vaccinia virus has been used as a smallpox vaccine. Now that smallpox has been eradicated, the vaccinia virus is expected to be used as a bioterrorism countermeasure and a recombinant vaccine vector for other infectious diseases, such as viral hemorrhagic fevers. Many vaccinia virus strains were used as smallpox vaccines in the smallpox eradication campaign coordinated by the World Health Organization. These strains can be classified into generations, according to the history of improving production methods and efforts to reduce the adverse reactions. Significantly, the third-generation of smallpox vaccine strains, which include modified vaccinia Ankara (MVA) and LC16m8, are currently popular as recombinant vaccine vectors due to their well-balanced safety and immunogenicity profiles. The present review firstly focuses on the characteristics of the smallpox vaccine generations. The historical background of the development of the third-generation smallpox vaccine strains is detailed, along with the history of the transition of the vaccinia virus generation used as vectors for hemorrhagic fever vaccines to the third generation. Among the vaccinia viruses, MVA is currently the most commonly used vector for developing hemorrhagic fever vaccines, including dengue fever, yellow fever, Ebola viral disease, Lassa fever, Rift Valley fever, and Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever. LC16m8 is a vaccine candidate for severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome. The current status and recent advances in the development of these hemorrhagic fever vaccines using third-generation vaccinia strains are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• MF59 adjuvant increases antibody-mediated cross-reactive immunity. • MF59-adjuvanted influenza vaccine may provide broader seasonal protection. • MF59 improved immune response to heterologous strains vs nonadjuvanted vaccine. • Improvements were seen in subjects with lower preexisting antibody titers. • Neither subject age nor vaccine history affected the results. Vaccination is the most effective approach to reduce the substantial morbidity and mortality caused by influenza infection. Vaccine efficacy is highly sensitive to antigenic changes causing differences between circulating and vaccine viruses. Adjuvants such as MF59 increase antibody-mediated cross-reactive immunity and therefore may provide broader seasonal protection. A recent clinical trial showed that an MF59-adjuvanted vaccine was more efficacious than a nonadjuvanted comparator in subjects < 2 years of age, although not in those ≥ 2 years, during influenza seasons in which the predominant circulating virus was an A/H3N2 strain that was antigenically different from the vaccine virus. This finding suggested that the increased efficacy of the adjuvanted vaccine in younger subjects may be mediated by strain cross-reactive antibodies. A subset of the trial population, representing subjects with distinct age and/or immunological history, was tested for antibody responses to the vaccine A/H3N2 strain as well as A/H3N2 drifted strains antigenically matching the viruses circulating during the trial seasons. The neutralizing tests showed that, compared with nonadjuvanted vaccine, the adjuvanted vaccine improved not only the neutralizing antibody response to the vaccine strain but also the cross-reactive antibody response to the drifted strains in subjects with lower preexisting antibody titers, regardless of their age or vaccine history. The results demonstrated an immunological benefit and suggested a potential efficacy benefit by adjuvanted vaccine in subjects with lower preexisting antibody responses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Development of improved FMD vaccines for East Africa. • Selection of candidate FMDV vaccine strains based on stability and serology. • Stability diversity between and within FMDV serotypes. Foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) is a global burden on the livestock industry. The causative agent, FMD virus (FMDV), is highly infectious and exists in seven distinct serotypes. Vaccination remains the most effective control strategy in endemic regions and current FMD vaccines are made from inactivated preparations of whole virus. The inherent instability of FMDV and the emergence of new strains presents challenges to efficacious vaccine development. Currently, vaccines available in East Africa are comprised of relatively historic strains with unreported stabilities. As an initial step to produce an improved multivalent FMD vaccine we have identified naturally stable East African FMDV strains for each of the A, O, SAT1 and SAT2 serotypes and investigated their potential for protecting ruminants against strains that have recently circulated in East Africa. Interestingly, high diversity in stability between and within serotypes was observed, and in comparison to non-African A serotype viruses reported to date, the East African strains tested in this study are less stable. Candidate vaccine strains were adapted to propagation in BHK-21 cells with minimal capsid changes and used to generate vaccinate sera that effectively neutralised a panel of FMDV strains selected to improve FMD vaccines used in East Africa. This work highlights the importance of combining tools to predict and assess FMDV vaccine stability, with cell culture adaptation and serological tests in the development of FMD vaccines. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is an important viral pathogen responsible for severe infection of the lower respiratory tract in children under the age of 5 years. No vaccines against RSV are currently in clinical use. Vaccine-associated enhanced respiratory disease (ERD) caused by excess Th2 type responses was observed in a clinical trial of formalin-inactivated RSV (FI-RSV) in antigen-naïve infants. Thus, inducing a balanced immune response is a crucial issue in the development of an RSV vaccine. In this study, we constructed, expressed, and purified a recombinant RSV vaccine candidate (i.e. , HRØ24) containing the two heptad repeat regions and the antigenic sites Ø, II, and IV of the RSV F protein. The RSV vaccine candidate was intranasally administrated to BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice in combination with virus-like particles (VLPs) derived from the core protein of the hepatitis B virus (HBc). Mucosal immunity to HRØ24 was then assessed. Intranasal administration of HBc VLPs in combination with HRØ24 induced serum IgGs against HRØ24 as well as lung HRØ24-specific sIgAs in both C57BL/6 and BALB/c mouse models. The secretion of IFN-γ from splenocyte re-stimulation and an elevated ratio of serum IgG2a to IgG1 indicated that the immune response induced by the HBc VLPs/HRØ24 mixture was Th1-biased. Weight loss of <5% and no to low eosinophil infiltration was observed in histological analysis of the lung following a challenge with the RSV A2 strain. These results suggest that the HBc VLPs/HRØ24 combination conferred substantial partial protection against RSV-induced illness in mice. Long-term immunity to RSV-induced illness was achieved via intranasal vaccination using a mixture of HBc VLPs and HRØ24 in mouse models. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• The Japanese immunization law was revised in October 2020. • Rotavirus vaccines are now included in the Japanese National Immunization Program. • Rules on vaccine intervals have been withdrawn. • The Japan Pediatric Society Vaccine Information Statement was published in 2018. • Concerns remain regarding the Japanese immunization program. The Japanese immunization program has made considerable progress since 2009: several new vaccines have been introduced and most are included in the National Immunization Program (NIP). In October 2020, the Japanese law on immunization was revised, which resulted in a few laudable achievements. First, rotavirus vaccines were added to the NIP, 10 years after their introduction, and noteworthy studies of vaccine effectiveness and the incidence of intussusception in Japanese children were published. Second, rules on vaccine intervals—which had been a longstanding concern—were withdrawn. In addition to this revision of the law, the Japanese version of the Vaccine Information Statement (VIS) was released by the Japan Pediatric Society in 2018. The VIS provides useful caregiver information on general immunization concepts and individual vaccines. Further challenges for the Japanese immunization program include (1) administering a booster dose of pertussis-containing vaccine to preschool children or teenagers, (2) reestablishing the active recommendation for human papilloma virus vaccines, (3) adding the mumps and influenza vaccines to the NIP, and (4) ensuring optimal dosing of seasonal influenza vaccines. During the current coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, vaccination rates among children have been decreasing in many countries. In Japan, vaccination rates have been stable in infants, but declining among toddlers and school-aged children, despite public awareness of the need for timely administration of vaccines during the pandemic. Clearly, further action is needed if we are to adequately protect children living in Japan from vaccine-preventable diseases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Brighton Collaboration Viral Vector Vaccines Safety Working Group (V3SWG) was formed to evaluate the safety and characteristics of live, recombinant viral vector vaccines. The Modified Vaccinia Ankara (MVA) vector system is being explored as a platform for development of multiple vaccines. This paper reviews the molecular and biological features specifically of the MVA-BN vector system, followed by a template with details on the safety and characteristics of an MVA-BN based vaccine against Zaire ebolavirus and other filovirus strains. The MVA-BN-Filo vaccine is based on a live, highly attenuated poxviral vector incapable of replicating in human cells and encodes glycoproteins of Ebola virus Zaire, Sudan virus and Marburg virus and the nucleoprotein of the Thai Forest virus. This vaccine has been approved in the European Union in July 2020 as part of a heterologous Ebola vaccination regimen. The MVA-BN vector is attenuated following over 500 serial passages in eggs, showing restricted host tropism and incompetence to replicate in human cells. MVA has six major deletions and other mutations of genes outside these deletions, which all contribute to the replication deficiency in human and other mammalian cells. Attenuation of MVA-BN was demonstrated by safe administration in immunocompromised mice and non-human primates. In multiple clinical trials with the MVA-BN backbone, more than 7800 participants have been vaccinated, demonstrating a safety profile consistent with other licensed, modern vaccines. MVA-BN has been approved as smallpox vaccine in Europe and Canada in 2013, and as smallpox and monkeypox vaccine in the US in 2019. No signal for inflammatory cardiac disorders was identified throughout the MVA-BN development program. This is in sharp contrast to the older, replicating vaccinia smallpox vaccines, which have a known risk for myocarditis and/or pericarditis in up to 1 in 200 vaccinees. MVA-BN-Filo as part of a heterologous Ebola vaccination regimen (Ad26.ZEBOV/MVA-BN-Filo) has undergone clinical testing including Phase III in West Africa and is currently in use in large scale vaccination studies in Central African countries. This paper provides a comprehensive picture of the MVA-BN vector, which has reached regulatory approvals, both as MVA-BN backbone for smallpox/monkeypox, as well as for the MVA-BN-Filo construct as part of an Ebola vaccination regimen, and therefore aims to provide solutions to prevent disease from high-consequence human pathogens. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Replication-incompetent adenoviral vectors have been under investigation as a platform to carry a variety of transgenes, and express them as a basis for vaccine development. A replication-incompetent adenoviral vector based on human adenovirus type 26 (Ad26) has been evaluated in several clinical trials. The Brighton Collaboration Viral Vector Vaccines Safety Working Group (V3SWG) was formed to evaluate the safety and features of recombinant viral vector vaccines. This paper reviews features of the Ad26 vectors, including tabulation of safety and risk assessment characteristics of Ad26-based vaccines. In the Ad26 vector, deletion of E1 gene rendering the vector replication incompetent is combined with additional genetic engineering for vaccine manufacturability and transgene expression optimization. These vaccines can be manufactured in mammalian cell lines at scale providing an effective, flexible system for high-yield manufacturing. Ad26 vector vaccines have favorable thermostability profiles, compatible with vaccine supply chains. Safety data are compiled in the Ad26 vaccine safety database version 4.0, with unblinded data from 23 ongoing and completed clinical studies for 3912 participants in five different Ad26-based vaccine programs. Overall, Ad26-based vaccines have been well tolerated, with no significant safety issues identified. Evaluation of Ad26-based vaccines is continuing, with >114,000 participants vaccinated as of 4th September 2020. Extensive evaluation of immunogenicity in humans shows strong, durable humoral and cellular immune responses. Clinical trials have not revealed impact of pre-existing immunity to Ad26 on vaccine immunogenicity, even in the presence of Ad26 neutralizing antibody titers or Ad26-targeting T cell responses at baseline. The first Ad26-based vaccine, against Ebola virus, received marketing authorization from EC on 1st July 2020, as part of the Ad26.ZEBOV, MVA-BN-Filo vaccine regimen. New developments based on Ad26 vectors are underway, including a COVID-19 vaccine, which is currently in phase 3 of clinical evaluation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Eastern equine encephalitis virus (EEEV) is a mosquito borne alphavirus spread primarily in Atlantic and Gulf Coast regions of the United States. EEEV is the causative agent of a devastating meningoencephalitis syndrome, with approximately 30% mortality and significant morbidity. There is no licensed human vaccine against EEEV. An inactivated EEEV vaccine has been offered under investigational new drug (IND) protocols at the United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID) since 1976. Healthy at-risk laboratory personnel received inactivated PE-6 strain EEEV (TSI-GSD 104) vaccine under two separate IND protocols. Protocol FY 99–11 (2002–2008) had a primary series consisting of doses on day 0, 7, and 28. Protocol FY 06–31 (2008–2016) utilized a primary series with doses on day 0 and 28, and month 6. Participants with an inadequate immune response, plaque reduction neutralization test with 80% cut-off (PRNT80) titer < 40, received booster vaccination. Volunteers with prior EEEV vaccination were eligible to enroll for booster doses based on annual titer evaluation. The FY06-31 dosing schema resulted in significantly greater post-primary series immune response (PRNT80 ≥ 40) rates (84% vs 54%) and geometric mean titers (184.1 vs 39.4). The FY 06–31 dosing schema also resulted in significantly greater cumulative annual immune response rates from 1 to up to 7 years post vaccination (75% vs 59%) and geometric mean of titers (60.1 vs 43.0). The majority of probably or definitely related adverse events were mild and local; there were no probably or definitely related serious adverse events. Inactivated PE-6 EEEV vaccine is safe and immunogenic in at-risk laboratory personnel. A prolonged primary series, with month 6 dose, significantly improved vaccine immunogenicity both post-primary series and longitudinally on annual titers. Despite decades of safe use under IND, full licensure is not planned due to manufacturing constraints, and ongoing development of alternatives. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Beginning in December of 2019, a novel coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2, emerged in China and is now a global pandemic with extensive morbidity and mortality. With the emergence of this threat, an unprecedented effort to develop vaccines against this virus began. As vaccines are now being introduced globally, we face the prospect of millions of people being vaccinated with multiple types of vaccines many of which use new vaccine platforms. Since medical events happen without vaccines, it will be important to know at what rate events occur in the background so that when adverse events are identified one has a frame of reference with which to compare the rates of these events so as to make an initial assessment as to whether there is a potential safety concern or not. Background rates vary over time, by geography, by sex, socioeconomic status and by age group. Here we describe two key steps for post-introduction safety evaluation of COVID-19 vaccines: Defining a dynamic list of Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI) and establishing background rates for these AESI. We use multiple examples to illustrate use of rates and caveats for their use. In addition we discuss tools available from the Brighton Collaboration that facilitate case evaluation and understanding of AESI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• vHVT-H5 vaccines were tested for protection against HPAI viruses in chickens. • All vaccines provided clinical protection and reduced viral shedding. • COBRA vHVT-H5 vaccines elicited broadest antibody responses against diverse strains. • Wild-type vHVT-H5 vaccines elicited responses only against close genetic clades. • Coupling recombinant HVT and COBRA holds promise for universal H5 poultry vaccines. The genetic and antigenic drift associated with the high pathogenicity avian influenza (HPAI) viruses of Goose/Guangdong (Gs/GD) lineage and the emergence of vaccine-resistant field viruses underscores the need for a broadly protective H5 influenza A vaccine. Here, we tested experimental vector herpesvirus of turkey (vHVT)-H5 vaccines containing either wild-type clade 2.3.4.4A-derived H5 inserts or computationally optimized broadly reactive antigen (COBRA) inserts with challenge by homologous and genetically divergent H5 HPAI Gs/GD lineage viruses in chickens. Direct assessment of protection was confirmed for all the tested constructs, which provided clinical protection against the homologous and heterologous H5 HPAI Gs/GD challenge viruses and significantly decreased oropharyngeal shedding titers compared to the sham vaccine. The cross reactivity was assessed by hemagglutinin inhibition (HI) and focus reduction assay against a panel of phylogenetically and antigenically diverse H5 strains. The COBRA-derived H5 inserts elicited antibody responses against antigenically diverse strains, while the wild-type-derived H5 vaccines elicited protection mostly against close antigenically related clades 2.3.4.4A and 2.3.4.4D viruses. In conclusion, the HVT vector, a widely used replicating vaccine platform in poultry, with H5 insert provides clinical protection and significant reduction of viral shedding against homologous and heterologous challenge. In addition, the COBRA-derived inserts have the potential to be used against antigenically distinct co-circulating viruses and future drift variants. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Immunological differences between males and females in response to viral vaccines are well known. This the first review to examine them for the Human Papilloma Virus. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the immunogenicity of the Quadrivalent Human Papilloma Virus Vaccine qHPVV. We searched Medline, Embase, and CENTRAL for trials published until September 17, 2019. Inclusion criteria were 3-doses and reporting geometric mean titers (GMTs). We performed random-effects meta-analyses and meta-regression separated by age group and sex. Our search yielded 1809 unique studies. 334 full texts were screened and data from 18 studies were extracted. Females had higher pooled geometric mean titers than males in all age groups. Log transformed GMTs in male children (<16) years were: against HPV6: 6·62 (95% CI 6·29–6·94; I2 = 86·0%), against HPV11: 7·07 (95% CI 6·90–7·23; I2 = 63.1%), against HPV16: 8·53 (95% CI 8·28–8·78; I2 = 73·0%), and against HPV18 7·21 (95% CI 7·08–7·34; I2 = 26·4%). In females: against HPV6 7·10 (95% CI 6·79–7·41; I2 = 96·6%), HPV11: 7·32 (95% CI 7·15–7·50; I2 = 90·6%), HPV16: 8·71 (95% CI 8·52–8·91; I2 = 90·2%), and HPV18 7·35 (95% CI 7·11–7·58; I2 = 92·7%). In the meta-regression, the sexual difference was significant for HPV6 (p = 0·022) with a similar tendency for HPV11 (p = 0·066) and HPV18 (p = 0·079). Immunogenicity was significantly higher in children (<16) than in adults (p < 0·001). Females have higher antibody titers against HPV after receiving the qHPVV than do males. The difference is bigger in low-risk HPV strains. Adjusting the doses and schedules for each sex should be explored further. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]