Search

Purpose: Urological complications are common and serious in kidney transplant patients. Correct diagnosis of urological complications and rapid intervention are very important to maintain the transplanted organ. Using endoscopic methods and rapid access to ureteral orifice can be effective in treatment and management of urological complications in transplant patients., Materials and Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, 934 medical records of kidney transplant patients who underwent surgery through Posterolateral Extravesical Ureteroneocystostomy (PLEVUNC) and anterior extravesical ureteroneocystostomy (AEVUNC) techniques from 2011 to 2018 were evaluated. The outcomes of PLEVUNC and AEVUNC techniques were evaluated in 461 and 473 transplant patients, respectively. The patients were followed up for 60 months. Immediate and delayed complications, urological complications requiring endoscopic intervention, duration of access to ureteral orifice, as well as ureteroscopic and endoscopic outcomes were evaluated., Results: The mean and ± SD (standard deviation) age of patients in PLEVUNC and AEVUNC groups were 46.2 7± 2.7 years and 47.3 ± 3.6 years, respectively. Urinary leakage and UTI were the most common immediate (7% and 6.2%) and delayed (5.5% and 5.5%) complications in both groups, respectively. The time to find ureteral orifice in patients requiring endoscopic intervention was significantly shorter in PLEVUNC group 3.5±1.2 compared with the AEVUNC group 10 ± 4.5 (P <.001). In 100% of PLEVUNC group and 62.6% of AEVUNC group, ureteral orifice of transplanted kidney was observed (P <.001). Ureteroscopy was reported successful in 94.5% and 37.4% of patients in PLEVUNC and AEVUNC groups, respectively., Conclusion: Easy and safe access to the ureteral orifice and to the upper urinary tract in transplant recipients can be achieved with the PLEVUNC technique. In case of urological complications this method facilitates endoscopy.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of transvesical open prostatectomy (OP) compared with transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) in patients with benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) with a prostate weight of 40-65 grams. The short-term and long-term complications of these two procedures were also assessed., Materials and Methods: In this retrospective study, we included 160 consecutive patients with BPH who had undergone TURP (n=80) or OP surgery (n=80) from 2006 to 2017. Inclusion criteria were positive history of BPH, definite indication for prostatectomy, and prostate weight between 40 to 65 grams. Patients were evaluated for duration of hospitalization, need for re-operation, short-term and long-term postoperative complications, urinary flow rate, peak flow rate (Q max) and international prostate symptom score (IPSS)., Results: The mean age ± Standard Deviation (SD) of patients' age was 62.4 ± 3.7 and 67.2 ± 4.6 years in the TURP and OP groups, respectively. Four (5%) and seven (8.7%) patients required transfusion in the TURP group and OP groups, respectively. Dysuria was significantly more frequent in the TURP group from week two to 12 months after surgery as compared with the OP group (P < .001). Hemodynamic changes and decrease in serum sodium level were not reported in either group. However, the urinary retention and need for urinary catheterization in the first year was significantly different between the two groups with 10 cases (12.5%) in the TURP group and no cases in the OP group (P<0.001). The need for reoperation in the TURP group was reported (27 procedures on 19 patients) (33.7%) of patients. Furthermore, retrograde ejaculation (RE) was reported in 65 (81.2%) and 80 patients (100%) of the TURP and OP group, respectively., Conclusion: Despite the fact that TURP is the standard method of treatment for BPH when the prostate weighs between 40-65 grams, the results of our study showed that OP is a more efficient and safe surgery for these patients and is associated with less complications. Furthermore, the need for re-operation seems to be higher in patients with TURP.

Purpose: With the invention of miniature devices, it has been advised to apply less aggressive methods for the management of upper urinary tract stones, especially in children. In the recent years, ultra-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (UMP) has been used for the treatment of upper urinary tract stones in order to perform surgeries with less complications and more acceptable outcomes. Results reported from different medical centers have been promising., Materials and Methods: Twenty-two children aged less than 8 years old with upper urinary stones sized between 10-20 mm underwent UMP. Inclusion criteria was solitary unilateral kidney stone, stone size between 10-20 mm, normal renal function tests, absence of any congenital malformations, and history of previous ESWL failure. Data including age, sex, side of kidney involvement, size of stone, location of stone, duration of surgery, duration of hospitalization, stone composition, need for blood transfusion, damage to adjacent organs, postoperative fever, septicemia after surgery, need for narcotics, further need for a complementary method, stone-free rate, pre and post-operative hemoglobin levels, and urinary leakage from the access tract were extracted from patients' medical files and were recorded., Results: The mean age (± standard deviation) of children was 5.22 (±1.57) years. Fourteen (63.6%) patients were male. Fifteen (68.2%) renal stones were located in the right kidney, and 82% of patients had pelvis stones. 13 (59%) patients' stones were composed of calcium oxalate. Stone-free rate was 95.5%. In none of the cases urinary leakage, septicemia after surgery, injury to adjacent organs, and need for blood transfusions was reported., Conclusion: Ultra-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy is an efficient and safe method for treating urinary stones sized between 10-20 mm in children.