Search

Objectives To present our experience with hand-assisted laparoscopy (HAL) for larger renal specimens. One of the theoretical benefits of HAL is the ability to manage large renal specimens, which we defined as tumors greater than 7 cm, and tumors in obese patients. Methods Between March 1998 and October 2000, 106 HAL radical nephrectomies were performed for enhancing renal masses, for which 95 patients had complete preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data. Of the 95 patients, 32 underwent HAL for large tumors (7 cm or greater) and 41 had a body mass index of 31 or greater. The demographic and outcome data of these two groups were compared with 63 patients who underwent HAL for tumors less than 7 cm and 54 patients with a body mass index of less than 31. Results When comparing cohorts by tumor size, the only statistically significant differences were in convalescence and specimen weight. Patients with lesions 7 cm or greater required 21 days to recover compared with 18 days for patients with lesions less than 7 cm. Obese patients had statistically significantly higher American Society of Anesthesiologists classifications, longer operative times (214 versus 176 minutes), and longer convalescences (21 versus 17.5 days) compared with nonobese patients. The estimated blood loss and conversion rate was not different between the groups. Furthermore, no difference was noted between the groups in the incidence of positive margins, local recurrence, or metastatic recurrence at a mean follow-up of 12.2 months. Conclusions HAL provides a safe, reproducible, and minimally invasive technique to remove large renal tumors and renal tumors in the obese.

Objectives. Nephroureterectomy with removal of the bladder cuff is the standard of care for patients with upper tract transitional cell carcinoma. Historically, it has been performed using two separate incisions or one large incision extending from the lateral flank to the symphysis pubis. We describe an alternative technique using endoscopic and hand-assisted laparoscopic techniques and present our experience. Methods. During the past 18 months, 22 patients at two institutions underwent hand-assisted laparoscopic nephroureterectomy. In 19 patients, the distal ureter and bladder cuff were managed endoscopically. In 3 patients, the distal ureter and the bladder cuff were removed by an extravesical, laparoscopic technique. The intraoperative parameters assessed included operative time, estimated blood loss, specimen weight, surgical margin status, pathologic grade and stage, and acute complications. Postoperative endpoints included the time to sustained fluid intake, parenteral narcotic requirement (milliequivalents of morphine sulfate), oral narcotic requirement (number of tablets), length of stay, time until return to normal activity, and rate of tumor recurrence. Results. The average age of our patient population was 65 years (range 42 to 86), 10 patients were men and 12 were women, and the average American Society of Anesthesiologists classification was 2.2. All but 2 patients had their specimens removed en bloc. No intraoperative complications occurred. The average operative time was 272 minutes (range 190 to 440), and the average blood loss was 180 mL (range 50 to 400); no patient required a transfusion. The mean specimen weight was 457 g (range 190 to 1420). All 22 patients had negative surgical margins. Postoperatively, the time to sustained fluid intake averaged 2.1 days (range 1 to 7), the mean parenteral narcotic requirement was 55 mEq (range 12 to 107.8) of morphine sulfate, the mean oral narcotic requirement was 5.8 tablets (range 1 to 14), and the average length of stay was 4.1 days (range 3 to 14). One patient developed thrombophlebitis of the right external jugular vein from a central line and required 2 weeks of intravenous antibiotics. The mean time to return to normal activity was 19 days; the mean follow-up was 13 months. Six patients had disease recurrence: four low-grade, low-stage bladder tumors and two metastatic tumors. All patients were alive at 18 months. Conclusions. Hand-assisted laparoscopic nephroureterectomy with endoscopic management of the bladder cuff is a viable and efficacious alternative to open nephroureterectomy. The technique allows the surgeon to perform an en bloc resection of the kidney, ureter, and bladder cuff without compromising oncologic principles. Patients benefit from a decrease in pain and hospital stay and quicker convalescence. Longer follow-up and comparative studies to standard open techniques are underway.

Objectives To evaluate the impact of the American Urological Association Hands on Laparoscopy course on the participants’ practices. Many urologists without fellowship training perform laparoscopy, but do not advance beyond hand-assisted, extirpative laparoscopy. The American Urological Association Hands on Laparoscopy course was designed to help these practitioners advance their skills. Methods A total of 68 urologists, aged 31 to 61 years (mean 46.6), participated in one of the four courses given between August 2002 and March 2004. The 2-day course included performing standardized tasks under videotape analysis and participating in porcine and pelvic trainer laboratory sessions. Surveys were sent by regular and electronic mail in September 2004 to assess the courses’ impact. The mean follow-up was 15.2 months (range 7 to 25). Results Of the 68 surveys mailed, 54 were returned (79%). Most respondents were in private practice and had had prior experience with extirpative laparoscopy. Of the respondents, 41 (76%) reported that their laparoscopic practice had expanded after taking the course, with 34% performing at least 2 cases per month. Also, 33 respondents (61%) reported performing laparoscopic suturing after taking the course, with 35% having sutured a bleeding vessel. Of the respondents, 85% reported that the video mentoring during the course was helpful. Of those who purchased a pelvic trainer, 90% reported practicing on it regularly. Conclusions The Hands on Laparoscopy course appeared to contribute to expansion of laparoscopic practices. Experience gained from skills-based lectures, videotape analysis of pelvic trainer performance, and a mentored porcine laboratory resulted in most (61%) participants expanding their practice to include clinical laparoscopic suturing.

To assess the construct validity of the da Vinci Skills Simulator (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA). Ideally, a well-designed simulator should demonstrate construct validity, which is defined in this study as the correlation between robotic surgical experience and performance on the simulator.Thirty-nine surgeons (18 [46%] group I [0-20 robotic cases]; 8 [21%] group II [21-150 robotic cases]; and 13 [33%] group III [150 robotic cases]) were enrolled from September 2010 to December 2010. Participants completed 24 virtual-reality exercises on the da Vinci Skills Simulator. Data on 12 performance metrics were collected by the software. Overall means for score and time across exercises were analyzed.Overall scores (64.7%/79.1%/87.4%) and time scores (39.1%/58.6%/87.3%) were significantly different among surgeons in groups I-III (P.001) and demonstrated significant linear relationships (P.001) for all 24 exercises. Comparisons between the 3 groups using a univariate general linear model (GLM) was used to compare groups I and II and II and III. Groups I and II differed using overall score for 15 exercises and time score for 11 exercises. Groups II and III differed using overall score for 6 exercises and time score for 15 exercises. Mean overall score for 1 exercise displayed significance between both groups I and II and II and III; while using time score, 5 exercises displayed significance between surgeons in groups I and II and II and III.Initial construct validity analysis revealed that both overall scores and time scores showed a significant linear relationship when comparing the surgeons in groups I, II, and III. Overall score seems to be a stronger indicator for differences between surgeons in groups I and II. Time score seems to be a stronger indicator for differences between surgeons in groups II and III.

Objectives The American Urological Association Hands on Laparoscopy course was designed to help practitioners without laparoscopic training advance their skills. We evaluated the long-term effect of this course on urologists' practice. Methods A total of 52 urologists, 37-61 years old (mean 50.7), participated in one of three courses given from August 2002 to October 2003. The 2-day course included performing standardized tasks with videotape analysis and participating in porcine and pelvic trainer laboratory sessions with intense mentoring from known experts. Surveys were sent by regular and electronic mail in February 2007 to assess the effect of the course. The mean follow-up was 48 months (range 41-55). Results Of the 52 surveys mailed, 32 were returned (61%). Most respondents were in private practice and had previous experience with extirpative urologic laparoscopy. Of the 32 respondents, 31 (97%) reported that their laparoscopic practice had expanded after taking the course. Also, 24 (75%) reported having sutured laparoscopically after taking the course, with 61% having sutured a bleeding vessel, and 80% reported that the video mentoring during the course was helpful. Of those who purchased a pelvic trainer, 90% reported practicing on it regularly. Conclusions The results of our study have shown that the Hands on Laparoscopy course has a significant long-term (mean 48 months) effect on the laparoscopic practice of course alumni. The experience gained from skills-based lectures, videotape analysis of pelvic trainer performance, and a mentored porcine laboratory session resulted in most participants expanding their practice (97%) and suturing laparoscopically (75%).