Search

Objective To identify locations of recurrence after radical prostatectomy (RP) with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) Materials and Methods We performed a retrospective review of patients with PSMA-PET imaging for biochemical recurrence following RP with PSA ≤2.0 ng/mL and assessed if the recurrent disease was within standard radiation target volumes. We compared patient and clinical variables between men with recurrences covered by standard salvage radiation fields and those with recurrences outside of standard fields. Results We identified 125 patients for study inclusion. The median PSA at imaging was 0.40 ng/mL (interquartile range 0.28-0.63). PSMA-avid disease was found in 66 patients (53%). Of these, 25 patients (38%) had PSMA-avid lesions found outside of the pelvis, 33 (50%) had lesions confined to the pelvic lymph nodes and prostate bed, and 8 (12%) men had PSMA-avid recurrence only in the prostate bed. Salvage radiation including standard Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) pelvic nodal volumes would not cover PSMA-avid nodal disease in 38 men (30%). PSA at the time of imaging was statistically associated with having PSMA-avid disease outside of standard nodal fields (P Conclusion The 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET detects disease in a majority of patients with PSA ≤2.0 following RP. Nearly one-third of men had PSMA-avid disease that would be missed by standard radiation fields. This imaging modality may dramatically impact the design and use of post-RP salvage radiotherapy.

Objective To evaluate the impact of staging 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET imaging on radiotherapy (RT) dose and volumes in patients with prostate cancer. Methods Forty-five patients (89% high or very high risk by NCCN criteria) who underwent 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET imaging prior to definitive treatment for prostate cancer between December 2015 and December 2016 were included. Locations of 68Ga-PSMA-11-avid lesions were compared to Radiation Therapy Oncology Group consensus pelvic nodal volumes (clinical target volume [CTV]); coverage of lesions outside the consensus CTV was considered a major change, while dose-escalation to lesions within the consensus CTV was considered a minor change. Results All patients had 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET uptake in the prostate. Twenty-five patients (56%) had N1/M1a disease on 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET scan, of whom 21 (47%) were previously N0. Six patients (13%) had bone metastases on 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET scan, of whom 4 had prior negative bone scans. Eight patients (18%) had lymph node metastases outside the consensus CTV. Twelve patients (27%) received a RT boost to nodes within the consensus CTV. Six patients (13%) had limited bone metastases treated with focal RT. Overall PSMA PET imaging resulted in major and/or minor changes to RT plans in 24 patients (53%). Conclusion 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET imaging resulted in RT changes in 53% of patients. Prospective investigation is needed to evaluate the clinical benefit of RT changes based on staging 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET imaging.