Search

Objective: To study the first reported case of intravesical angiomyofibroblastoma (AMFB). AMFB is an uncommon benign mesenchymal lesion, mostly described in the lower female genital tract, especially in the vulva and less commonly in the vagina. It is rarely seen in the male genital tract. The importance of this rare neoplasm is related to its potential mimicry of more infiltrative and prognostically less favorable lesions, such as aggressive angiomyxomas, that are found in the same anatomic area., Methods: A 26-year-old man presented to us with hematuria. Investigations revealed an intraluminal polypoidal lesion of approximately 92 × 77 × 76 mm within the urinary bladder. Cystoscopy revealed a large well-circumscribed tumor with a pedicle, attached to the inferolateral wall of the bladder near the bladder neck. Open exploration and en bloc excision of the bladder mass was done., Results: Histopathology and immunohistochemistry (IHC) confirmed the diagnosis of AMFB., Conclusion: AMFB presents as a well-circumscribed superficial mass. Complete excision of the tumor for histopathologic and IHC examination is essential for diagnosis. This rare tumor shows morphologic similarity to some more aggressive tumors with less favorable outcome; hence, it needs to be differentiated from those. IHC is helpful but not always conclusive in the diagnosis of this rare neoplasm. This being the first-ever reported case of intravesical AMFB bears a significant importance. Careful clinical assessment, operative management, and histopathologic examination are of utmost importance in making a precise diagnosis and management of the patient., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To compare the rapidity of stone capture and removal by six tipless and four helical baskets in a ureteral model. Expeditious ureteral stone extraction is reliant on the basket size, configuration, and radial dilation force., Methods: A 5-mm feline calculus was placed in a simulated model of the human ureter at a distance of 7.5 cm from the orifice, and saline irrigant instilled. A 6/7.5F Wolf semirigid ureteroscope was used for access and visualization of the stone. Operators were randomized to start stone extraction with 1 of 10 stone baskets, and three extraction attempts were conducted with each device. Six experienced operators tested each device. The tipless baskets tested were the ACMI Sur-Catch NT 3.0F, Bard Dimension 3.0F, Boston Scientific Zerotip 3.0F, Cook N-Circle 3.0F, Cook Delta 2.4F, and Sacred Heart Halo 1.9F. The helical baskets tested were the Cook N-Force 3.2F, Microvasive Gemini 3.0F, ACMI Sur-Catch Helical 3.0F, and Sacred Heart Hercules 3.0F. The time to extraction in seconds was recorded., Results: No statistically significant difference was observed between the tipless (14 +/- 7 seconds) or helical (12.8 +/- 6.6 seconds, P = 0.21) basket groups. All baskets were able to retrieve the ureteral stones successfully. The most efficient basket was the Cook N-Circle with an average time of 8.7 seconds to stone extraction compared with the least efficient basket, the ACMI Sur-Catch NT, at 15.8 seconds., Conclusions: The Cook N-Circle basket provided the most expeditious means to stone extraction in a ureteral model.