1. Implementing Continuous Quality Improvement in an Integrated Community Urology Practice: Lessons Learned
- Author
-
Sarah Mohedin, Paul Dato, Robert Topp, William J. Catalona, Edward Cohen, Lawrence S. Friedman, Amirali Salmasi, Franklin Gaylis, Christopher J. Kane, Ryan Nasseri, Sadie Swift, Rose Prime, and Christopher B. Anderson
- Subjects
Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Quality management ,Prostate biopsy ,Biopsy ,Urology ,media_common.quotation_subject ,030232 urology & nephrology ,Psychological intervention ,MEDLINE ,Audit ,Risk Assessment ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Health care ,Electronic Health Records ,Humans ,Medicine ,Quality (business) ,Community Health Services ,Practice Patterns, Physicians' ,Watchful Waiting ,media_common ,Clinical Audit ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,Delivery of Health Care, Integrated ,business.industry ,Medical record ,Prostatic Neoplasms ,Quality Improvement ,United States ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Guideline Adherence ,business - Abstract
To determine the effectiveness of 2 different continuous quality improvement interventions in an integrated community urology practice. We specifically assessed the impact of audited physician feedback on improving physicians' adoption of active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer (CaP) and adherence to a prostate biopsy time-out intervention.The electronic medical records of Genesis Healthcare Partners were analyzed between August 24, 2011 and September 30, 2020 to evaluate the performance of 2 quality interventions: audited physician feedback to improve active surveillance adoption in low-risk CaP patients, and audited physician feedback to promote adherence to an electronic medical records embedded prostate biopsy time-out template. Physician and Genesis Healthcare Partners group adherence to each quality initiative was compared before and after each intervention type using ANOVA testing.For active surveillance, we consistently saw an increase in active surveillance adoption for low risk CaP patients in association with continuous audited feedback (P.001). Adherence to the prostate biopsy time-out template improved when audited feedback was provided (P.001).The implementation of clinical guidelines into routine clinical practice remains challenging and poses an obstacle to the improvement of United States healthcare quality. Continuous quality improvement should be a dynamic process, and in our experience, audited feedback coupled with education is most effective.
- Published
- 2021