1. Does CARMENA mark the end of cytoreductive nephrectomy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma?
- Author
-
Lauren C. Harshman, Toni K. Choueiri, and Steven L. Chang
- Subjects
Oncology ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Standard of care ,business.industry ,Sunitinib ,Urology ,030232 urology & nephrology ,Disease ,urologic and male genital diseases ,medicine.disease ,Systemic therapy ,law.invention ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Randomized controlled trial ,Renal cell carcinoma ,law ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Internal medicine ,Medicine ,Cytoreductive nephrectomy ,business ,medicine.drug - Abstract
Cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) was established as the standard of care for the management of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in the early 2000s. Since that time, systemic therapeutic options for mRCC have rapidly expanded and progressed. The CARMENA trial was a phase III prospective, randomized clinical trial that accrued patient from 2009 to 2017, and the results show that treatment with sunitinib is noninferior to treatment with CN followed by sunitinib. Because the findings of CARMENA suggest that systemic therapy should be considered alongside CN as frontline therapy for mRCC, it is therefore important to define the clear indications for CN in the management of mRCC which include palliation, nonclear cell histology, consolidative therapy after systemic therapy, and oligometastic disease. Furthermore, CN may become increasingly important as immunotherapeutic options become widely adopted in the future. Given the heterogeneous nature of mRCC, a multidisciplinary approach should be taken to tailor the use of systemic therapy and CN for each individual patient.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF