Search

European farmers are facing challenges that call for important transformations on their agricultural production systems, including an increasing number of regulations aimed at reducing environmental impacts from farming practices. Climate change is also expected to affect agricultural production in most European regions, and in Southern Europe this effect is expected to negatively impact yields. In this study, we present the application of an innovative participatory approach to assess the potential of innovative agricultural systems to reconcile environmental sustainability with economic viability while contributing to local and global food security. Our approach consisted of combining (1) the participation of local stakeholders in the design of narrative scenarios, and (2) an integrated assessment of scenarios through the calculation of indicators at different scale with a bio-economic model. We tested our approach with a case study situated in the Camargue region of Southern France. Rice is currently the main crop in this region, but farmers there face adverse economic conditions linked to the recent reform of European Common Agriculture Policy. After identifying the main drivers of change, local stakeholders developed narrative scenarios and described how farmers would adapt within the context of those changes. These elements were then translated into model inputs. At the regional level, the four scenarios led to variations in farmland acreage (28,000–33,000 ha), as well as the proportion of rice crops (19–75%) and areas cultivated under organic farming standards (8–43%). The four scenarios also led to different values for indicators of agricultural economic welfare, food production, and environmental impacts. Trade-offs between these indicators and the associated objectives assigned to agriculture were identified and discussed with the stakeholders. We end with a discussion of the limitations and advantages of our approach to the participatory development and a

European farmers are facing challenges that call for important transformations on their agricultural production systems, including an increasing number of regulations aimed at reducing environmental impacts from farming practices. Climate change is also expected to affect agricultural production in most European regions, and in Southern Europe this effect is expected to negatively impact yields. In this study, we present the application of an innovative participatory approach to assess the potential of innovative agricultural systems to reconcile environmental sustainability with economic viability while contributing to local and global food security. Our approach consisted of combining (1) the participation of local stakeholders in the design of narrative scenarios, and (2) an integrated assessment of scenarios through the calculation of indicators at different scale with a bio-economic model. We tested our approach with a case study situated in the Camargue region of Southern France. Rice is currently the main crop in this region, but farmers there face adverse economic conditions linked to the recent reform of European Common Agriculture Policy. After identifying the main drivers of change, local stakeholders developed narrative scenarios and described how farmers would adapt within the context of those changes. These elements were then translated into model inputs. At the regional level, the four scenarios led to variations in farmland acreage (28,000–33,000 ha), as well as the proportion of rice crops (19–75%) and areas cultivated under organic farming standards (8–43%). The four scenarios also led to different values for indicators of agricultural economic welfare, food production, and environmental impacts. Trade-offs between these indicators and the associated objectives assigned to agriculture were identified and discussed with the stakeholders. We end with a discussion of the limitations and advantages of our approach to the participatory development and a

Organic rice production is characterised by high yield variability and substantial productivity gaps with respect to conventional systems. Variability may be accentuated in areas of erratic climate, such as in the Mediterranean region of La Camargue in southern France. While management recommendations for organic cropping systems are not readily available, innovative farmers develop strategies to achieve high, and less variable, yields. The objectives of this study were to identify the main factors affecting yield variability and the farmer management strategies used to sustain crop productivity while reducing input use. Participatory monitoring of farmer fields for yields, yield components, soil condition, weeds and management practices from 1992 to 2009 resulted in a database of more than 380 entries. These data included continuous, discrete and nominal variables. They were explored using classification and regression trees to describe management strategies under conventional and organic systems and to identify and categorise the main variables associated with rice yield variability. Rice yields varied between 0.5 and 10 t ha−1 under conventional and between 0 and 9 t ha−1 under organic management. Weed competition was the main factor affecting yield for both conventional and organic systems. The gap between current average yields and the estimated yield potential of 10 t ha−1 was on average 2.7 t ha−1 under conventional and 5 t ha−1 under organic management. The latter can be largely attributed to the effect of weed competition. The productivity gap between conventional and organic management fluctuated between c. 1 t ha−1 under conducive conditions and c. 4 t ha−1 under limiting conditions (e.g., severe salinity problems). Strategies to attain high yields under conventional and organic management differed: Under conventional management, a low initial plant stand associated with early sowing was compensated by high tillering rates induced through N fertilisation

Organic rice production is characterised by high yield variability and substantial productivity gaps with respect to conventional systems. Variability may be accentuated in areas of erratic climate, such as in the Mediterranean region of La Camargue in southern France. While management recommendations for organic cropping systems are not readily available, innovative farmers develop strategies to achieve high, and less variable, yields. The objectives of this study were to identify the main factors affecting yield variability and the farmer management strategies used to sustain crop productivity while reducing input use. Participatory monitoring of farmer fields for yields, yield components, soil condition, weeds and management practices from 1992 to 2009 resulted in a database of more than 380 entries. These data included continuous, discrete and nominal variables. They were explored using classification and regression trees to describe management strategies under conventional and organic systems and to identify and categorise the main variables associated with rice yield variability. Rice yields varied between 0.5 and 10 t ha−1 under conventional and between 0 and 9 t ha−1 under organic management. Weed competition was the main factor affecting yield for both conventional and organic systems. The gap between current average yields and the estimated yield potential of 10 t ha−1 was on average 2.7 t ha−1 under conventional and 5 t ha−1 under organic management. The latter can be largely attributed to the effect of weed competition. The productivity gap between conventional and organic management fluctuated between c. 1 t ha−1 under conducive conditions and c. 4 t ha−1 under limiting conditions (e.g., severe salinity problems). Strategies to attain high yields under conventional and organic management differed: Under conventional management, a low initial plant stand associated with early sowing was compensated by high tillering rates induced through N fertilisation