Search

Your search keyword '"B, van Calster"' showing total 44 results

Search Constraints

Start Over You searched for: Author "B, van Calster" Remove constraint Author: "B, van Calster" Journal ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology Remove constraint Journal: ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology
44 results on '"B, van Calster"'

Search Results

1. Ultrasound characteristics of endometrial cancer as defined by International Endometrial Tumor Analysis (IETA) consensus nomenclature: prospective multicenter study

2. International Endometrial Tumor Analysis (IETA) terminology in women with postmenopausal bleeding and sonographic endometrial thickness ≥ 4.5 mm: agreement and reliability study

3. OC03.01: *A comparison between the IOTA assessment of different neoplasias in the adnexa, the risk of malignancy index and the risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm to assess the risk of malignancy in women with an ovarian tumour

4. Managing pregnancy of unknown location based on initial serum progesterone and serial serum hCG levels: development and validation of a two-step triage protocol

5. VP66.25: Triaging women with abnormal uterine bleeding in ambulatory care: results from the prospective IETA‐1 cohort study

6. Subjective ultrasound assessment, the ADNEX model and ultrasound-guided tru-cut biopsy to differentiate disseminated primary ovarian cancer from metastatic non-ovarian cancer

7. OC12.01: Reporting the endometrium and intracavitary lesions using the IETA terminology: results of the IETA-1 multicentric prospective study

8. OC12.03: An ultrasound-based algorithm to determine the likelihood of various causes of abnormal uterine bleeding: a proposal by the IETA group

9. OC16.04: External validation of the M6 model and the two‐step triage system for pregnancies of unknown location

10. Collagen plug sealing of iatrogenic fetal membrane defects after fetoscopic surgery for congenital diaphragmatic hernia

11. Are serum HE4 or ROMA scores useful to experienced examiners for improving characterization of adnexal masses after transvaginal ultrasonography?

12. Predicting successful vaginal birth after Cesarean section using a model based on Cesarean scar features examined by transvaginal sonography

13. Lesion size affects diagnostic performance of IOTA logistic regression models, IOTA simple rules and risk of malignancy index in discriminating between benign and malignant adnexal masses

14. OC11.02: IOTA benign easy descriptors and ADNEX model integrated in a ‘traffic light system’ to guide the clinical management of adnexal pathology

15. OC14.01: Ultrasound characteristics of endometrial cancer as defined by the International Endometrial Tumor Analysis (IETA) consensus nomenclature: a prospective multicentre study

16. OP15.06: Performance of RMI, IOTA ADNEX and simple rules risk model in the assessment of adnexal masses not classifiable using the revised benign easy descriptors as first step: a novel two-step strategy

17. External validation of ADNEX model for diagnosing ovarian cancer: evaluating performance of differentiation between tumor subgroups

18. Clinical implications of intra- and interobserver reproducibility of transvaginal sonographic measurement of gestational sac and crown-rump length at 6-9 weeks' gestation

19. OC01.02: Balancing risks of surgery with risks of conservative management of benign adnexal masses: results from the postmenopausal follow-up arm of IOTA5

20. OC01.04: A multicentre trial on the performance of a two-step triage protocol based on initial serum progesterone and serial hCG used to manage pregnancies of unknown location (PUL)

22. OC08.02: A preoperative risk model with ultrasound variables to assess lymph node metastasis in endometrial cancer patients: a model development and validation study by the IETA group

24. OC12.02: A comparison of demographic characteristics between women with benign and malignant endometrium: results of the IETA-1 multicentre prospective study

25. OC19.05: Evaluating cut-off values for progesterone, single hCG and hCG ratio to define pregnancy viability and location in women with a pregnancy of unknown location (PUL)

26. OC11.01: Clinical utility of IOTA models, RMI and ROMA to refer patients with adnexal masses to specialised oncology care

27. OC01.01: Risk of complications in conservatively managed adnexal masses initially thought to be benign at subjective impression by the ultrasound examiner

28. OC11.03: Prospective validation of IOTA methods in the differentiation between benign and malignant adnexal masses

29. OC04.03: Quantifying the risk of ovarian malignancy prior to surgery based on the IOTA simple rules

30. OC07.01: The International Endometrial Tumor Analysis (IETA) study: interim analysis of measurement differences between centres

31. OC16.01: Pain and ultrasonographic appearance of endometriomas may change with age

32. Reply

33. OC21.02: Lesion size affects the diagnostic performance of the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) logistic regression models, the IOTA simple rules and the risk of malignancy index to estimate the risk of malignancy in adnexal masses

34. OC07.01: Serial hCG assays for the management of pregnancies of unknown location (PUL): does the timing of hCG samples matter?

35. OC25.05: Adjusting prediction models for ovarian tumor classification to new clinical settings

36. OP10.02: Sealing of iatrogenic fetal membrane defects after fetoscopic surgery for congenital diaphragmatic hernia by collagen plugs

37. OC21.02: Selection of women with an ovarian tumor for surgery in specialist centers: a comparison of two triaging protocols

38. OP25.02: The influence of maternal body mass index and subsequent weight gain pattern on fetal growth

39. OC07.05: Comparing the subjective impression of the examiner to the hCG ratio and mathematical models for the management of pregnancies of unknown location (PUL)

40. OP02.07: Behaviour of serum hormone levels at 4 and 5 weeks gestation in an IVF treatment population

41. OC14.01: Using a model based on serum biochemistry at 4 and 5 weeks gestation to predict immediate viability and viability at 12 weeks in IVF pregnancies

42. OC21.04: A prediction model to distinguish between benign, borderline, stage I invasive, higher stage invasive, and metastatic adnexal tumors

43. OC01.02: What measurements are needed to classify pregnancies of unknown location?

44. OC05.05: External validation of 'old' and new mathematical models to distinguish between benign and malignant adnexal masses

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources