1. Understanding confounding factors allows for accurate interpretation of liver stiffness measurements by ElastQ, a novel 2D shear wave elastography technique.
- Author
-
Bauer DJ, De Silvestri A, Maiocchi L, Raimondi A, Mare R, Mandorfer M, Sporea I, Müllner-Bucsics T, Ferraioli G, and Reiberger T
- Abstract
Purpose: Liver stiffness measurement (LSM) using vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) or two-dimensional shear wave elastography (2D-SWE) is recommended to assess the risk of liver fibrosis and advanced chronic liver disease. Even though both techniques measure liver stiffness, their numerical results often diverge. Confounders and reliability criteria for 2D-SWE have not been systematically investigated., Materials and Methods: We prospectively recruited participants with paired LSM by VCTE and the novel 2D-SWE technique ElastQ (Philips) in three European tertiary centers. The following parameters were recorded: sex, age, body mass index (BMI), etiology, laboratory markers of liver damage and function, as well as cholestasis, LSM by VCTE and controlled attenuation parameter (CAP), interquartile range (IQR)/median for VCTE-LSM and ElastQ-LSM, and the skin-to-liver capsule distance., Results: We included 840 participants: 447 (53.2%) males; median age 57.0 [IQR:19.0] years; median BMI 25.4 [6.0] kg/m
2 ; median VCTE-LSM 7.25 [9.2] kPa; median ElastQ-LSM 6.7 [5.4] kPa. On uni- and multivariable modeling (adjusted for LSM), we found that the discrepancy increased with liver stiffness and markers of disease severity. Skin-to-liver capsule distance and BMI affected VCTE-LSM more compared to ElastQ-LSM and significantly increased the discordance between the two measurements., Conclusion: The discrepancy of ElastQ-LSM to VCTE-LSM increases with liver stiffness and disease severity. BMI and skin-to-liver capsule distance increase the discrepancy between VCTE- and ElastQ-LSM but affect ElastQ-LSM less. The quality criterion IQR/median ≤ 30% indicates reliable ElastQ-LSM., Competing Interests: DB served as a speaker and/or consultant and/or advisory board member for AbbVie and Siemens, received travel support from AbbVie and Gilead, and received grant support from Gilead and Siemens. ADS, LM, AR, RM: nothing to declare. MM served as a speaker and/or consultant and/or advisory board member for AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead, Collective Acumen, and W. L. Gore & Associates and received travel support from AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Gilead. IS served as speaker for AbbVie, BMS, Gilead, Janssen, Echosens, and Philips; and received advisory board fees from AbbVie, Merck; Siemens, Canon; and received research support from Philips. GF served as a speaker for Canon Medical Systems, Fujifilm Medical Systems, Mindray Medical Systems, Philips Medical Systems, and Siemens Healthineers; served as advisory board member for Philips Medical Systems, and her institution received grant/research support from Canon Medical Systems, Esaote S.p.A., Fujifilm Medical Systems, Mindray Medical Systems, Siemens Healthineers. She receives royalties from Elsevier Publisher. TR served as a speaker and/or consultant and/or advisory board member for AbbVie, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Gilead, Intercept, MSD, Siemens, and W. L. Gore & Associates and received grants/research support from AbbVie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Gilead, MSD, Philips, and W. L. Gore & Associates as well as travel support from Boehringer Ingelheim and Gilead., (The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).)- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF