Search

Objective: Cystic echinococcosis (hydatid cyst) is one of the most important parasitic zoonoses that affect both humans and animals and has been known since prehistoric times. The cystic echinoccosis is a major health problem in our country as well as in many countries worldwide, and serological methods, in addition to imaging techniques, are used in the diagnosis of hydatid cyst. In the present study, anti- Echinococcus antibodies were investigated by ELISA in patient's serum samples, which were routinely delivered to the Medical Microbiology Laboratory of Gazi University Faculty of Medicine due to suspected hydatid cyst., Methods: A total of 186 patients with suspected hydatid cysts from several outpatient clinics and departments of Gazi University Hospital were included in the present study. IgG antibodies in serum samples of patients with anti-Echinococcus were investigated by ELISA (Novalisa Echinococcus IgG, NovaTec, Germany)., Results: Anti-Echinococcus IgG seropositivity was determined as 35.5% in patients with suspected hydatid cyst. There are no statistical differences in ELISA positive results relating to gender, adult/child age group and associated clinics., Conclusion: Hydatid cyst seropositivity was higher among patients admitted to our hospital.

In order to investigate a possible link between parasites and chronic urticaria, the prevalence of intestinal protozoans in stool samples of individuals with chronic urticaria (n=55) and healthy controls (n=43) were evaluated with native lugol, formol-ethyl acetate concentration and trichrom dye, modified acid fast. In the case of Giardia intestinalis (G. intestinalis) ELISA was also used. In the study 29.1% of the patients were found to have protozoan (Blastocystis hominis + G.intestinalis) infections. On the other hand, only 11.6% of the patients in healthy group were having a protozoon infection, all of which were B. hominis. There was no statistically significant difference between the patient group and control group regarding the frequency of B. hominis presence. Also, the number of G.intestinalis positive patients were also statistically different in patient group from those of healthy controls. In patients whom were positive for protozoan infections, agent specific therapy was used. In 7 of these patients symptoms of the disease were subsided with this therapy while six continued to have relapses. Three patients had missed the control visits therefore the course of the disease was not evaluated. As a conclusion, protozoans should be considered in the etiology of chronic urticaria and stool examination should be done in these patients routinely.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the value of the direct fluorescent antibody (DFA) techniques reported to have high sensitivity and specificity and the enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) test used to determine antigens in stool samples in the routine diagnosis of Giardia intestinalis. When 44 stool samples in which G. intestinalis cysts and/or trophozoites had been seen during native Lugol examination were investigated, positivity detected with the trichrome staining method, monoclonal ELISA method and monoclonal DFA method was found to be 37 (84.0%), 39 (88.6%) and 35 (79.5%) respectively. DFA detected Crytosporidium parvum cysts in addition to G. intestinalis in one sample. Twenty-seven (61.4%) of the samples were positive with all three methods. When compared with the DFA method, the ELISA method had a sensitivity of 88.6%, a specificity of 88.8%, a positive predictive value of 79.5% and a negative predictive value of 20.0% while the trichrome staining method had a sensitivity of 85.7%, a specificity of 77.8%, a positive predictive value of 81.1% and a negative predictive value of 22.2%. There was no statistically significant difference between the DFA and ELISA tests and between the DFA test and the trichrome staining method for diagnosing G. intestinalis (p > 0.05).