Search

The Turkish Journal of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, established in 1972, is 50 years old now. The number of citations of the journal and the interest of national and international researchers are high. This success has been achieved by the editorial boards who have contributed to the journal since its establishment and the writers who have contributed to its development, and this success will continue to increase. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Cardiologists are the most frequently consulted specialists during pre-operative evaluations. However, unnecessary cardiology consultations (CC) can increase cardiologists' workload without impacting anaesthesia practice, resulting in delayed surgeries and additional financial burdens. We hypothesize that using Gupta during the preoperative period can reduce these adverse effects. Methods: This prospective study included patients scheduled for elective noncardiac, nonvascular surgeries who underwent pre-operative assessment. Patients who had no specific risk index used for preoperative cardiac risk evaluation were classified as Group I, and those evaluated using the Gupta scale were classified as Group II. The study compared preoperative CC, diagnostic tests, surgical delays, major adverse cardiac event (MACE), length of hospital stay and intensive care unit (ICU) stay, mortality, and costs. Results: A total of 898 patients were included in the study, with 487 in Group I and 411 in Group II. The Gupta group reduced the demand for preoperative CC (P<0.001) and preoperative non-invasive diagnostic testing (n = 107, 21.9% vs. n = 36, 8.75%). The time from the anaesthesiology outpatient clinic to surgery was 15 days in Group I and 14 days in Group II (P=0.132). The length of ICU stay was higher in Group I (P=0.019). MACE was 15 patients (3.08%) in Group I and 9 patients (2.19%) in Group II (P=0.076). The cost of patients in Group I was higher than that in Group II (P=0.019). Conclusion: Using Gupta in preoperative evaluation may reduce unnecessary preoperative resource usage, surgical delays, ICU hospitalization rates, additional costs, and mortality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: This prospective randomized study compared 2 different methods for ProsealTM Laryngeal Mask Airway (PLMA) fixation. Methods: Patients scheduled for ureterorenoscopic lithotripsy surgery in the lithotomy position were included in the study. General anaesthesia with PLMA was administered to the patients. To achieve PLMA fixation, patients were randomly assigned to either adjustable elastic band (Group I) or adhesive tape fixation (Group II). Fiberoptic bronchoscope (FOB) evaluation and glottic image grading (grade 1-4) and lip margin distances of PLMA (M1 and M2) were evaluated before and after the surgical procedure. Results: We enrolled 116 patients. Surgery of 7 patients was postponed. PLMA dislocated in 2 patients in group II during positioning. For another patient who used adhesive tape in Group II, it was removed because it could not adhere to properly, and a new sticking plaster was used. The study was completed with 106 patients. In FOB evaluation, the number of patients with optimal FOB grade (FOB grade 1) after PLMA was inserted and fixed was more in Group I than in Group II (P = 0.01). FOB evaluation was repeated at the end of the operation, and the number of patients with the worst FOB grade (FOB grade 4) was 0 (0%) and 11 (10.5%) in Groups I and II, respectively. PLMA displaced more than 1 cm in 10 (18.9%) patients in Group I and in 30 patients (56.6%) in Group II. Conclusion: The adjustable elastic band method is simple, easy, and convenient and can be used in any surgical procedure for PLMA fixation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of the pandemic on clinical practice and education of anaesthesiology and reanimation residents in Turkey. Methods: A 33-question web-based survey was sent to anaesthesiology and reanimation residents in Turkey. Residents were asked about their clinical practice and education before and during the pandemic and personal perspectives on working conditions and training. Results: A total of 223 residents participated. Median working time in the intensive care unit of 2.5 months/year before the pandemic increased to 6 months/year during the pandemic (P < .001). Median working time in the operating room of 9 months/year decreased to 6 months/year (P < .001). The time working in the algology and anaesthesiology outpatient clinic decreased significantly (both P < .001). Neuraxial and peripheral nerve block practices decreased (P = .002 and P = .023, respectively). The number of night shifts per month increased (P < .001). While the average number of beds in intensive care units was 14, it increased to 19.5 beds (P < .001). The education time for lecture and clinical case discussion decreased (P < .001), but medical meeting attendance did not change (P = .174). Eighty-seven percent of the residents reported that night shifts were very intense and intense during the pandemic. For 87.3% of the respondents, the workload increased, and 71.6% of the respondents reported a decrease in theoretical education and 66.7% in practical training. Sixty-three percent of last year residents reported that they were negatively and very negatively affected in making the thesis. Conclusion: The pandemic had a negative impact on anaesthesiology and reanimation residency training programs in Turkey. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]