Search

Objectives: Typical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) can be cured with slow pathway ablation. This study was designed to assess the alterations in atrial and ventricular functioning using speckle tracking echocardiography in consecutive patients with typical AVNRT who underwent slow pathway radiofrequency (RF) ablation., Study Design: Included in this study were 23 consecutive patients with symptomatic drug-resistant typical (slow-fast) AVNRT, all of whom underwent an invasive electrophysiology study and RF ablation. Patients underwent transthoracic echocardiographic evaluation 24 hours before and 24 hours after the ablation procedure., Results: AVNRT was induced during the electrophysiological study, and RF ablation successfully eliminated tachyarrhythmia in 23 (100%) patients. The atrial-His (A-H) interval was decreased in the post-ablation period compared to the pre-ablation period without the occurrence of immediate conduction disturbances. Peak left atrial longitudinal strain during the reservoir phase was increased in the post-ablation period compared to the pre-ablation period (48.24±16.45 vs. 38.07±15.72, p<0.001). The left atrial septal electromechanical coupling time was significantly decreased after the procedure (48.90±12.26 vs. 38.92±7.14 ms, p=0.036)., Conclusion: In addition to treatment of arrhythmia, RF catheter ablation of AVNRT may also restore left atrial function as early as 24 hours after the procedure.

Carotid artery stenosis is the major cause of the stroke associated with ischemic origin and carries increased mortality and morbidity. Since carotid artery endarterectomy (CEA) was first performed in 1950, in conjunction with the advanced technology and increased experience under the guidance of randomized controlled trials, balloon angioplasty and carotid artery stenting, which have similar mortality and morbidity, have become comparable with CEA. Determining the optimal treatment option for each patient is the most important issue in carotid artery stenosis. Today, there have been improvements in technology and recent advances in the cardiovascular sciences. Moreover, there is increased experience, increased attention to patient selection, and a team approach to find the most suitable treatment for the patient. In this review, we briefly discuss the current treatment approaches for carotid artery stenosis under the guidance of the modern studies.