1. Does canopy mean nitrogen concentration explain variation in canopy light use efficiency across 14 contrasting forest sites?
- Author
-
Matthias Falk, Sonia Wharton, Hans Verbeeck, Pasi Kolari, Annikki Mäkelä, Denis Loustau, Mikko Peltoniemi, Torben R. Christensen, Timo Vesala, Kentaro Takagi, Leonardo Montagnani, Fredrik Lagergren, Remko A. Duursma, Minna Pulkkinen, Department of Forest Sciences, University of Alaska [Fairbanks] (UAF), Vantaa Research Unit, Finnish Forest Research Institute, Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University, Faculty of Sciences and Technologies, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, Autonomous Province of Bolzano (APB), Atmospheric, Earth and Energy Division (AEED), Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), Lund University [Lund], Field Science Center for Northern Biosphere, Hokkaido University [Sapporo, Japan], Laboratory of Plant Ecology, Department of Applied Ecology and Environmental Biology, Universiteit Gent = Ghent University [Belgium] (UGENT), Research Group of Plant and Vegetation Ecology - Department of Biology, University of Antwerp (UA), Department of Physics, UC Davis Biometeorology Group, University of California [Davis] (UC Davis), University of California-University of California, Écologie fonctionnelle et physique de l'environnement (EPHYSE), and Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)
- Subjects
0106 biological sciences ,Canopy ,Light ,010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences ,Nitrogen ,Physiology ,Eddy covariance ,Plant Science ,Photosynthesis ,Atmospheric sciences ,01 natural sciences ,Trees ,[SDV.SA.SF]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Agricultural sciences/Silviculture, forestry ,Botany ,eddy covariance ,light use efficiency ,Leaf area index ,Biology ,ComputingMilieux_MISCELLANEOUS ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences ,Mathematics ,canopy nitrogen concentration ,Primary production ,15. Life on land ,gross primary production ,Photosynthetic capacity ,Photosynthetically active radiation ,Spatial variability ,quantum yield ,vegetation productivity ,010606 plant biology & botany - Abstract
The maximum light use efficiency (LUE = gross primary production (GPP)/absorbed photosynthetic photon flux density (aPPFD)) of plant canopies has been reported to vary spatially and some of this variation has previously been attributed to plant species differences. The canopy nitrogen concentration [N] can potentially explain some of this spatial variation. However, the current paradigm of the N-effect on photosynthesis is largely based on the relationship between photosynthetic capacity (A(max)) and [N], i.e., the effects of [N] on photosynthesis rates appear under high PPFD. A maximum LUE-[N] relationship, if it existed, would influence photosynthesis in the whole range of PPFD. We estimated maximum LUE for 14 eddy-covariance forest sites, examined its [N] dependency and investigated how the [N]-maximum LUE dependency could be incorporated into a GPP model. In the model, maximum LUE corresponds to LUE under optimal environmental conditions before light saturation takes place (the slope of GPP vs. PPFD under low PPFD). Maximum LUE was higher in deciduous/mixed than in coniferous sites, and correlated significantly with canopy mean [N]. Correlations between maximum LUE and canopy [N] existed regardless of daily PPFD, although we expected the correlation to disappear under low PPFD when LUE was also highest. Despite these correlations, including [N] in the model of GPP only marginally decreased the root mean squared error. Our results suggest that maximum LUE correlates linearly with canopy [N], but that a larger body of data is required before we can include this relationship into a GPP model. Gross primary production will therefore positively correlate with [N] already at low PPFD, and not only at high PPFD as is suggested by the prevailing paradigm of leaf-level A(max)-[N] relationships. This finding has consequences for modelling GPP driven by temporal changes or spatial variation in canopy [N].
- Published
- 2012
- Full Text
- View/download PDF