Search

It is well known that correction of uremia by kidney transplantation alone (KTA) improves left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD). However, for kidney transplant candidates with extremely severe LVSD, KTA is considered to be contraindicated because of the high risk of peri-operative management. We report a case of successful kidney transplantation with severe LVSD with an ejection fraction (EF) of 14% and low systolic blood pressure (SBP) of approximately 65 to 80 mm Hg. In this case, in spite of an extremely low EF and SBP, functional capacity was assessed using metabolic equivalents (METs) and showed a level of almost 4. The operation was performed carefully, considering the cardiac, operative, and anesthetic risks. No surgical complications occurred, and the patient received intensive care during the peri-operative period. His postoperative course was almost favorable, and he was discharged on postoperative day 29. The present report concludes that evaluation of METs may expand the indication for KTA in patients with extremely severe LVSD.

Objectives The aim of this study is to investigate the outcome of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy with vascular anomalies of the left renal vein. Patients and Methods Between August 2010 and September 2018, a total of 120 laparoscopic donor nephrectomies were performed at Kagoshima University. Among them, we experienced 7 cases of donors with anomalous left renal vein (circumaortic left renal vein n = 5, retroaortic left renal vein n = 1, left renal vein drainage into hemiazygos vein n = 1). We analyzed the following clinical outcomes: pneumoperitoneum time, estimated blood loss, warm ischemia time, length of hospital stay, and serum creatinine level of 1 month after surgery for evaluating the safety of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Results Among the 7 cases, 3 cases underwent transperitoneal approach, and 4 cases underwent retroperitoneal approach. The median pneumoperitoneum time was 168 (108–191) minutes. The median estimated blood loss was 90 (23–170) mL, and no donor required a blood transfusion. Median warm ischemia time was 4 (3–7) minutes. Length of hospital stay was 7 (6–9) days, and no readmission occurred. Median serum creatinine level of 1 month after surgery was 1.19 (0.84–1.74) mg/dL. Kidneys were transplanted successfully, and none of recipients required dialysis. Conclusions. Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy was safe for donors with an anomalous left renal vein. Preoperative recognition of anomalous left renal vein in computed tomography is important for avoiding hemorrhagic complication.

Living kidney donor guidelines recommend that donors in whom a malignancy is diagnosed should be excluded. Although preoperative screening for malignancies was performed, we experienced a case of living donor with small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) at the time of donation. A 53-year-old woman was referred to our hospital for a kidney donation to her son. She had no past medical history of malignancy. We screened the patient using medical examinations, but there was no obvious presence of malignancy. Although preoperative computed tomography showed a small lymph node swelling at the left renal hilum, we diagnosed it as an insignificant lymph node. When a laparoscopic donor nephrectomy was performed, however, we recognized the small lymph node during the surgery and performed a lymphadenectomy. Postoperatively, pathologic examination showed that the small node was lymphocytic lymphoma, known as a low malignant potential disease. Currently, there is no presence of malignancy transmission with the recipient. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case report of living kidney donor with SLL. Although SLL is considered a low-grade malignancy, it is crucial to follow it carefully in both the donor and the recipient.