Search

Background Borderline changes suspicious for acute T-cell–mediated rejection (BC) are frequently seen on biopsy specimens, but their clinical significance and clinical management are still controversial. Our goal was to compare clinical outcomes of kidney transplant recipients with biopsy-proven BC vs acute T-cell–mediated rejection (aTCMR) and the influence of treating BC on graft outcomes. Methods A retrospective cohort study was performed in all kidney transplant recipients with biopsy-proven BC and aTCMR between January 2012 and December 2018, according to Banff 2017 criteria; patients with concomitant antibody-mediated rejection were excluded. Results We included 85 patients, 30 with BC (35.3%) and 55 with aTCMR (64.7%). There was no difference between groups regarding demographics, HLA matching and sensitization, immunosuppression, or time of transplant. Treatment with steroids was started in 15 patients with BC (50%) and in all patients with aTCMR, with 4 of the latter additionally receiving thymoglobulin (7.2%). At 1 year post biopsy, overall graft survival was 71%, and despite presenting better estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at biopsy (33.3 ± 23.4 vs 19.9 ± 13.2 mL/min/1.73 m2, P = .008), patients in the BC group presented the same graft survival as the aTCMR group according to Kaplan-Meyer survival curves. When analyzing the BC group (n = 30) and comparing the patients who were treated (n = 15) vs a conservative approach (n = 15), graft survival at 1 year was 87% for treated patients and 73% for nontreated patients (P = .651), with no difference in eGFR for patients with functioning graft. However, at longer follow-up, survival curves showed a trend for better graft survival in treated patients (70.2 ± 9.2 vs 38.4 ± 8.4 months, P = .087). Conclusion Our study showed that patients with BC did not present better graft survival or graft function at 1 year after biopsy or at follow-up compared with the aTCMR group, despite better eGFR at diagnosis. We found a trend for better graft survival in patients with BC treated with steroids compared with a conservative approach. These results reinforce the importance of borderline changes in graft outcomes and that the decision to treat can influence long-term outcomes.

Annually, about 500 kidneys are transplanted in Portugal. Despite some studies looking into the procurement biopsies' benefits (like the potential of predicting long term results and establishing a baseline), few have studied its risks, especially in the period between the harvest and the transplant.A cross-sectional study, including all patients who received a kidney graft between the 2019 and 2020 at the University Hospital of Coimbra (n = 203). Biopsies were done using a polar double core puncture technique with 18-gauge needles.Fifty-six patients (27.6%) received a biopsied graft. The median postoperative hemoglobin fall was 2.8 g/dL; this fall was more pronounced in the group that received a biopsied kidney (3.2 g/dL vs 2.6 g/dL; P.05). The number of transfusions needed during the hospital stay (2.2 U vs 1.3 U; P.05) and the median length of stay (13.2 ± 8.4 vs 10.6 ± 5.8, P.05) were greater in the biopsied group. Patients who received a biopsied kidney were older (median age of 57.3 vs 46.9). Cold ischemia time was greater in the biopsied group (19 hours vs 15.2 hours; P.05). However, we did not find a relation between the age and the hemoglobin drop or blood transfusions. At discharge, renal function was not statistically different between the 2 groups (P was nonsignificant).Despite the biopsies' potential advantages, they are not without risks. This study showed a statistical association between harvest biopsies and higher risks of hemorrhage, regardless of age. When needed, procurement biopsies seemed safe for the recipients, but at the expense of increased patient surveillance and resource consumption.

Living donor kidney transplant represents the best treatment option for patients with end-stage kidney disease; however, it has been associated with possible risks to the donor. Our aim was to evaluate the impact of kidney donation in the donor's estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), blood pressure, and proteinuria and related risk factors.A single-center, retrospective study, including all living donors who underwent nephrectomy between January 2000 and December 2019, was performed. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data were collected. Risk factors for a decrease in eGFR30 mL/min/1.73 mEighty-six donors were included with a mean age of 46.7 ± 9.07 years. The mean follow-up was 105.6 ± 65.4 months, and 35 patients (41%) had more than 10 years of follow-up. No significant difference was found in proteinuria or body mass index (P.1) before and after the donation. The prevalence of hypertension was higher after kidney donation (9.3% vs 22.1%; P.001). A mean reduction in the eGFR in the first year of 37 ± 12 mL/min/1.73 mLiving donor nephrectomy appears to be an acceptably safe intervention. Predonation eGFR influences the adaptative response after nephrectomy; however, other variables did not have an impact on long-term outcome in our population.

Hepatitis E virus (HEV) is a cause of significant morbidity and mortality, representing an important global public health problem. Immunocompetent patients with acute hepatitis E can clear the infection spontaneously; however, in approximately two thirds of cases, immunosuppressed patients, such as kidney transplant (KT) recipients, fail to clear the HEV infection and develop chronic hepatitis.We report 3 cases of HEV infection in KT patients. Two presented only with laboratory abnormalities and elevated liver enzymes, and 1 presented with symptomatic disease motivating hospital admission. None was able to clear the infection spontaneously, and they were all treated with ribavirin, accompanied with reduction of immunosuppressive drugs. Adverse effects of the treatment were reported in 2 patients, and in 1 case, a dose reduction was necessary. All patients responded to the treatment and have no current evidence of active disease. No alterations of basal kidney function during or related to the treatment were registered.HEV screening in KT patients presenting with abnormal liver function of undetermined cause is fundamental, as it might have poorer outcomes in this specific population. The treatment with ribavirin seems to be safe and effective, although we must always be alert to potential side effects, maintaining a close follow-up of these patients.

Kidney retransplant outcomes in the elderly are not well established. Our aim was to compare major clinical outcomes between patients older and younger than 60 years old at retransplant and between first and second kidney transplant (KT) for recipients older than 60 years old.We performed a retrospective, longitudinal study that included all patients who underwent KT between January 2008 and December 2019. We defined 3 groups according to recipient age and retransplant status: group 1, patients ≥60 years old and retransplant; group 2, patients60 years old and retransplant; group 3, patients ≥60 years old and first kidney transplant. We compared clinical outcomes such as acute rejection, death-censored graft survival, and patient survival between groups.We included 109 patients with a second KT, including 13 older than 60 years old (group 1) and 96 younger than 60 years old (group 2). There were no differences in death-censored graft survival or patient survival. There were no biopsy-proven acute rejections for older patients compared with 21 events in the younger group. Regarding differences between retransplant (group 1, n = 13) and first kidney transplant (group 3, n = 390) in patients older than 60 years old, there were no differences in death-censored graft survival at 1 and 5 years or in patient survival.In our study, major clinical outcomes of retransplant in the elderly were similar to those of their younger counterparts with a second graft and with those of older patients with a first graft.

Despite progressive improvements in graft and patient survival after kidney transplantation over the last decades, an increasing number of patients are waitlisted for retransplantation. Identifying the risk factors for second graft failure can help us improve management for such patients. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of kidney retransplantation with those of first transplantation.This retrospective study included all the recipients of a second kidney transplant between January 2008 and December 2019. For each patient with a second kidney transplant, we selected the paired recipient from the same donor. We excluded recipients of donations from living donors, patient-and-donor pairs with more than 1 transplant, and patients without a pair. The follow-up took place December 31, 2020. We included 152 patients, corresponding to 76 pairs of recipients.Patients who underwent a second transplant had significantly higher panel reactive antibody values and longer waiting time for retransplantation. Biopsy-proven acute rejection episodes were doubled in patients undergoing a second transplant (P = .12). There was a lower survival of second grafts at the first, fifth, and 10th year (P.05). The main factor influencing graft loss for both groups was acute rejection, and, in patients, with a second transplant, acute rejection increased the risk of graft loss by 17 times (odds ratio, 17.5; 95% confidence interval, 4.19-98).The clinical results of second kidney transplants still fall short of first transplants, with the main factor of poor prognosis being acute rejection. In young patients, allocation and immunosuppression management should consider this risk to improve long-term outcomes.

Introduction Chronic kidney disease in the pediatric population is associated with numerous comorbidities and an increased risk of mortality. Kidney transplantation (KT) is considered to be the option of choice in children with end-stage renal disease. Aim To characterize a single center experience in pediatric KT in the last 35 years. Methods A retrospective analysis of epidemiologic and clinical data from KT pediatric patients from January 1981 to December 2016. For outcome analysis, cases were divided into decades (1981–89; 1990–99; 2000–09; 2010–16). Results One hundred and 4 children (KT mean age 13.7 ± 3.32 years; 57.7% male) underwent 111 renal transplants (13% with living donors). Congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract (36.5%) and glomerular disease (29%) were the major causes of renal disease. Peritoneal dialysis was the predominant initial therapeutic modality in 69 children (62.2%). Mean dialysis time was 19.2 months, 9 patients (8.1%) having had preemptive KT. Median follow-up was 181 months. Uncensored graft survivals rates at 5, 10, 15, and 20 years were 79.7%, 74.3%, 59.5%, and 52.8%, respectively. Graft survival improved significantly over the decades (P = .03). Higher estimated glomerular filtration rate measured at 1 year, induction immunosuppressive therapy use (thymoglobulin/basiliximab), and lower incidence of acute rejection rates were associated with superior graft survival (P Conclusions Uronephropathies were the most frequent cause of renal failure and peritoneal dialysis, which was the main renal replacement therapy according to the literature. Graft survival improved significantly over the study period; we hypothesize that this was related to surgical advances and the use of more effective immunosuppressive drugs.

Introduction Post-transplant diabetes mellitus is a complication of kidney transplantation with deleterious effects on graft and patient survival and is associated with higher mortality. The goal of this paper is to identify risk factors that contribute to its development so that it can be avoided. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of 659 kidney transplants performed in adult patients between January 2013 and December 2017. We excluded patients with a previous diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and identified 61 patients with post-transplant diabetes mellitus (10.6%), then compared them to a control group of 61 patients who did not suffer from the disease, namely the kidney transplant pair or the patient submitted for transplant immediately after. Discussion A comparative analysis of the 2 groups revealed significant differences regarding the use of β-blockers, fasting glucose on the fifth day post-transplant, kidney recipient age, and body mass index. Using multivariate logistic regression methods, 2 variables with an impact on post-transplant diabetes development were found: fasting glucose on the fifth day post-transplant (odds ratio 1.044, 95% confidence interval 1.010–1.079, P = .010) and body mass index (odds ratio 1.130, 95% confidence interval 1.009–1.264, P = .034). We did not find any differences for other potential risk factors. Conclusion A high plasma glucose level on the fifth day after the transplant and a high body mass index in the setting of the transplant can potentially impact the transplant's outcomes, so it is important to identify these levels as soon as possible to take measures to prevent this disease.

Introduction/Objective Transplantation is the treatment of choice in end-stage renal disease. However, there are complications that require transplantectomy. The objective of this study was to evaluate predictive factors for transplantectomy in the first 3 months after renal transplantation. Material and Methods This retrospective study included 770 kidney transplants performed between June 2011 and June 2017. Logistic regression was applied to study the relationship between independent variables and the occurrence of transplantectomy. Results Analyzing variables of the recipients, it was verified that age over 65 years; body mass index; dialysis time; history of previous transplant and comorbidities such as obesity, overweight, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, peripheral arterial disease; or history of a thrombotic episode were not predictive factors. It was found that the use of expanded criteria donors, their age, or cause of death were not predictive factors. The use of a right renal graft or grafts with multiple arteries; the duration of surgery; the performance of surgery at dawn; the need for transfusion; the cold ischemia time; and hemodynamic parameters at reperfusion (central venous pressure, systolic or diastolic blood pressure) were not predictive factors. The recipient age at transplantation (p = .014; B=–0.059; Exp(B)=0.943 [0.899-0.988]) and reoperation in the first 10 days after transplantation (p Conclusion Reoperation in the first 10 days after transplantation decreased the risk of transplantectomy in the first 3 months. The lower the age of the recipient, the greater the risk of transplantectomy.

Kidney transplantation (KT) is a surgery performed worldwide and has some complications. The objective of this study is to evaluate our surgical complications, comparing the outcomes with those KTs without surgical complications.An observational cross-sectional study of all surgical complications among 3102 kidney transplants performed between June 1980 and April 2018.Of 3102 kidney transplantations, 490 (15.8%) had the following complications: surgical complications (n = 527); urinary (n = 184; 5.9%); vascular (n = 140; 4.5%); wound-related (n = 78; 2.5%); lymphocele (n = 56; 1.8%); and others (n = 69; 2.2%). The most common complications were ureteral obstruction (n = 85; 2.7%) and urinary fistula (n = 72; 2.3%). The immunosuppression regimen did not influence the surgical complications rate. Surgical complications mainly occurred in male (71.4% vs 66.7%) and heavier (67.6 ± 13.9 vs 65.9 ± 13.5 kg) recipients (P .05). The hospitalization time was also different (26.3 ± 30.6 vs 15.0 ± 38.8 days, P .05). Serum creatinine values were different until the second year. After that, the renal function was approximately the same. Nearly 26.1% of complicated kidney transplants had delayed graft function (vs 14.8%, P .001). Only 23.9% of complicated kidney transplants needed transplant nephrectomy (vs 6.2%, P .001). The survival of kidneys with surgical complications was lower (64.2 ± 4.5 vs 94.09 ± 2.6 months, P .001).Kidney transplant surgical complications occur over time, especially urinary and vascular complications, remaining a problem that leads to prolonged hospitalization and decreased graft survival.

Cutaneous lesions in the presence of fever in patients undergoing immunosuppressive therapy are a diagnostic challenge and may represent manifestations of multiple diseases, such as fungal infections, nocardiosis, lymphoproliferative diseases, zoonosis, and tuberculosis. The authors report a case of a 66-year-old white man with chronic kidney disease since 2014 (chronic pyelonephritis) who had a renal transplant in the previous 6 months. Induction therapy was performed with thymoglobulin, and his current immunosuppression scheme included tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisolone. The patient had no history of pulmonary tuberculosis. The patient presented with 2 cutaneous lesions, localized on the back and abdomen, that appeared to be firm, painful, subcutaneous, erythematous nodules with an approximately 5 cm diameter overlying an infected focus and purulent material inside. The patient also had a fever and fatigue. Blood analysis showed pancytopenia with an elevation of inflammatory markers and graft dysfunction. Tissue cultures and skin biopsy with histological analysis were performed. Histopathology of the lesion showed a nonspecific inflammatory infiltrate without granulomas, and acid-fast bacillus staining was negative. Nevertheless, serum QuantiFERON testing was positive. But polymerase chain reaction finally confirmed the presence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, which confirmed the diagnosis of cutaneous tuberculosis. A chest computed tomography scan showed a lung pattern of miliary tuberculosis. The patient was treated with multidrug tuberculosis therapy, resulting in lesion clearance after 3 weeks. Tuberculosis is a serious infection, especially in high-risk patients, such as those in an immunocompromised state. The incidence of cutaneous tuberculosis is rare, but it should be considered in patients presenting with atypical skin lesions suggestive of an underlying infectious etiology.

Pretransplant kidney biopsy from marginal donors is used to guide the decision of whether to accept or discard organs for transplantation; however, there is controversy about this procedure, and the need for a pretransplant biopsy is still a debate. We sought to determine if histologic evaluation before implantation of marginal kidneys would influence the outcome.A retrospective observational cohort study of marginal donor transplants at Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra was done. From 2009 to 2016, 650 marginal kidney transplants were analyzed. We evaluated long-term graft survival in a cohort of patients who received marginal kidneys. The recipients were divided into 2 groups based on whether a pretransplant donor biopsy was performed. Continuous variables were summarized by mean and standard deviation or median and range, as applicable. Categorical variables were summarized by relative and absolute frequencies. The survival analysis was obtained and plotted using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the log-rank test.The median age of recipients and donors were statistically different between both groups (P .001), with the donors and the recipients being younger in the group without a pretransplant biopsy. The median cold ischemia time was higher in the biopsy group (P = .01). The survival analysis showed that graft survival didn't differ between the groups (P = .2).Selection of kidneys based on histological findings may not influence the graft survival and implies a higher cold ischemia time. More data are necessary to provide insight into which clinical, histologic, and biochemical parameters are necessary for decision making on kidney acceptance.

Background Staphylococcus infection–associated glomerulonephritis is a rare cause of graft dysfunction in kidney transplant. Suspicion should be high in the setting of elevation of serum creatinine, active urinary sediment, with or without hypocomplementemia, and simultaneous Staphylococcus aureus infection. A kidney biopsy is usually diagnostic. Case Report A 56-year-old man, who received a kidney transplant in 1998, with basal serum creatinine of 1.2 mg/dL and normal urinary sediment, was admitted to our kidney transplantation unit with graft dysfunction and a urinary tract infection caused by S aureus with septicemia, treated with antibiotics, in the context of recently intensified immunosuppression for a primary immune thrombocytopenia diagnosed 3 weeks earlier. After antibiotic treatment, the patient persisted with graft dysfunction, edema, and hypertension, with a S aureus isolation in the urine culture, active urinary sediment, and low C3. A kidney biopsy was performed, showing diffuse proliferative endocapillary and mesangial glomerulonephritis, with IgA(++) and C3(++) mesangial and endocapillary deposits in immunofluorescence. The patient was treated symptomatically and maintained his regular immunosuppression. At the last follow-up, his serum creatinine value was stable at 2.5 mg/dL. Conclusions The onset of a nephritic syndrome with a simultaneous S aureus infection should lead to suspicion of this uncommon entity, confirmed histologically. Despite its association with poor graft survival, our patient's graft survival remained stable.

NTRODUCTION: Collapsing glomerulopathy (CG) is a rare form of glomerular injury. Although commonly associated with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, it can occur in association with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). CASE REPORT: We present the case of a 50-year-old man, with chronic kidney disease secondary to focal and segmental glomerulosclerosis, who received a cadaveric kidney transplant in 2007. There were no relevant intercurrences until May 2015, when he presented with nephrotic range proteinuria (± 4 g/d). A graft biopsy was performed and it did not show any significant pathological changes. In September, he developed a full nephrotic syndrome (proteinuria 19 g/d) and a graft biopsy was repeated. CG features were evident with a rich immunofluorescence. Antinuclear antibodies (ANA) and anti-double-stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA) antibodies were positive; the remaining immunologic study was normal. Viral markers for HIV, hepatitis C virus (HCV), and hepatitis B virus (HBV) were negative. The patient was treated with corticosteroid pulses and plasmapheresis (seven treatments). A rapid deterioration of kidney function was seen and he became dialysis dependent. He was discharged with a low-dose immunosuppressive treatment. In October, he was hospitalized with diffuse alveolar hemorrhage (DAH). The auto-immune study was repeated, revealing complement consumption and positive titers of ANA and Anti-dsDNA antibodies. Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCAs) and antiglomerular basement membrane antibody (anti-GBM) were negative. Treatment with intravenous corticosteroids, plasmapheresis, and human immunoglobulin was ineffective and the outcome was fatal. CONCLUSION: This case report highlights the possible association of CG and SLE. To our knowledge, it is the first case of SLE presenting with CG and DAH, with the singularity of occurring in a kidney transplant recipient receiving immunosuppression. info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of early surgical complications of kidney transplantation in our institution and its association with donor and recipient factors, as well as patient and transplant outcome. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of all kidney transplants performed during 2015 was made. We evaluated the incidence of surgical complications and the outcome of patients and grafts at a 3-month follow-up interval. RESULTS: During the study period, 141 kidney transplants occurred. Seventeen patients had surgical complications (6 urologic, 6 vascular, and 5 other complications). Five patients lost the graft during the follow-up. Older age was associated with other surgical complications (P = .023), and graft loss was associated with the existence of surgical complications, namely, vascular complications (P

New-onset diabetes after transplantation (NODAT) is a serious complicatin of kidney transplantation (KT) with adverse impacts on graft and patient survivals. This study aims assess potential risk factors for development of NODAT and compare clinical outcomes of KT recipients with versus without NODAT.We retrospectively evaluated 648 patients who underwent KT between 2005 and 2009. From the 83 (12.8%) subjects who developed NODAT, we selected 47 for comparison with controls free of diabetes.The diagnosis of NODAT was made at 4.3 ± 8.5 months after transplantation in 47 patients, including 76.6% males, with an overall mean age of 54.5 ± 10.8 years. Patients with NODAT presented higher pretransplantation fasting plasma glucose levels (P.001) as well as cyclosporine and tacrolimus trough levels (P = .003 and P.001, respectively). On multivariate analysis, higher pretransplantation fasting plasma glucose and higher tacrolimus, but not cyclosporine concentrations were independent predictors of NODAT. No differences were found for other potential risk factors. Upon follow-up at 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months, renal function (estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate using Modification of Diet in Renal Disease), 24 hour proteinuria and proportions of patients with hypertension were similar between groups. Patients with NODAT showed comparable numbers of hospitalizations and infections, as well as acute rejection episodes and acute cardiovascular events as their counterparts. Event-free survival (loss of graft function/death with functioning graft) was similar between the groups (P = .418; K-M).In our population, higher pretransplantation fasting plasma glucose levels and higher tacrolimus concentrations were independent predictors of NODAT. During a mean follow-up of 3 years, NODAT was not associated with worse clinical outcomes.