Search

Background: New-onset diabetes after transplant (NODAT) is associated with serious morbidity and mortality. The incidence of NODAT is higher with tacrolimus (Tac) compared with cyclosporine (CsA); however, the effects of switching from Tac to CsA in NODAT have not been studied well., Materials and Methods: This was a single-center, open-label, prospective, randomized study, including renal transplant recipients who were on Tac-based immunosuppression and developed NODAT. Those with pretransplant diabetes, hypersensitivity to CsA or Tac, severe infections, and denying consent were excluded. Subjects were randomized to either switch to CsA or to continue on Tac. Fasting and postprandial plasma glucose, fasting insulin and C-peptide levels, insulin and oral hypoglycaemic agents (OHA) use were monitored monthly for 3 months, whereas glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) was checked at baseline and 3 months., Results: Sixty-seven subjects were randomized to switch to CsA (n = 32) or continuation of Tac (n = 35). Both groups had similar baseline characteristics. After randomization, there was significant improvement in fasting plasma glucose, fasting insulin levels, C-peptide levels, and insulin requirement in both groups, whereas HbA1c improved significantly only in the CsA group. The decline in fasting plasma glucose and insulin requirement was more significant in subjects on CsA. An equal number of subjects in each group (59.4% in CsA group and 40% in Tac group, P = ns) had resolution of NODAT. Weight gain was more significant in the CsA group; however, there was no difference in other side effects or rejection episodes., Conclusions: A switch from tacrolimus to cyclosporine is a safe and effective strategy in patients with NODAT., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Renal transplantation and immunosuppression are associated with an increased incidence of malignancy. Reduction or cessation of immunosuppressive therapy has been advocated in these cases to prevent tumor progression and recurrence. We evaluated the outcome of treatment of oropharyngeal cancer (OC) after renal transplantation without cessation of immunosuppressive therapy., Methods: The database of patients with OC after renal transplantation was analyzed with respect to age, sex, type of immunosuppression, interval between transplantation and diagnosis of cancer, as well as method of treatment and survival., Results: Thirty one (2.06%) renal transplant recipients developed malignancy including 6 (20%) with OC. Lingual cancer was seen in three, and one each showed an isolated tonsillar lymphoma, a parotid carcinoma, or a carcinoma of the larynx with only the last having had two other malignancies in the past. Three subjects were on immunosuppression with azathioprine and prednisolone, and the others were prescribed cyclosporine and prednisolone. Average time from transplantation to diagnosis of OC was 106 months. The interval was the shortest (2 years) for tonsillar lymphoma in an 18-year-old patient who received cyclosporine and showed features of left follicular tonsillitis. The patient with advanced carcinoma of the larynx did not receive any treatment and succumbed within 3 months. The dose of cyclosporine was reduced in the lymphoma case but immunosuppression was not altered in the other patients. All subjects were treated with a standard protocol. During a mean follow-up of 33 months, one had local recurrence of parotid carcinoma and the others showed well functioning renal grafts., Conclusion: Comprehensive treatment of OC after renal transplantation without withdrawing the immunosuppression prolonged the life of these patients with functioning grafts.