Search

Background The purpose of this study was to identify factors influencing changes in the body mass index (BMI) of kidney transplant (KT) patients and provide data for the management of the BMI of patients who have undergone KT. Method The participants were 106 patients who underwent KT at a single center from August 2014 to June 2017. BMIs were compared and analyzed for 6 months and 24 months after KT, and the survey details were collected through medical records. Analysis was performed between 2 groups, one with increased BMI and the other without. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the factors related to an increase in BMI. Results BMI increased from 22.60 ± 2.72 kg/m2 at 6 months to 23.18 ± 3.06 kg/m2 2 years after KT. The group with increased BMI (n = 39) had more patients with higher low-density cholesterol levels at the time of KT (low-density cholesterol ≥100 mg/dL; 34 [54.0%] vs 10 [26.3]; P = .008) and without statin drug use than the other group (n = 67) (statin drug use, 48 [70.6%] vs 34 [87.2%], P = .044). Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that age >50 years (odds ratio [OR] = 2.942; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.075-8.055; P = .036), low-density lipoprotein >100 mg/dL at KT (OR = 6.618; 95% CI, 2.225-19.682; P = 0.001), and no statin drugs (OR = 5.094; 95% CI, 1.449-17.911, P = .011) were the risk factors for an increased BMI after KT. Conclusions After KT, to prevent an increase in the BMI, clinicians should strongly recommend the use of drugs to treat hyperlipidemia, especially in elderly patients with high low-density lipoprotein levels before KT.

All over the world there is serious concern about the shortage of organs available for transplantation. In an effort to address this, transplantation with grafts, which was previously considered a contraindication, are now performed. In some cases, this practice has contributed to increasing the organ pool. Fibromuscular dysplasia (FMD) is the second-most-common cause of renovascular hypertension and is observed in 2%-6.6% of potential live kidney donors. Kidney with FMD is generally considered to be a contraindication for renal transplantation because renal artery stenosis may progress after transplantation and cause graft loss. Here, we report on a successful case of kidney transplantation using a graft with FMD of a deceased donor who had multiple aneurysms in the renal artery.

Alveolar hemorrhage is a life-threatening clinical syndrome often initially thought to be atypical pneumonia. Association with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is well studied, but not with solid organ transplantation. We report a case of a 54-year-old woman presented with fever and shortness of breath on the third posttransplant day after deceased donor liver transplantation. Imaging studies showed diffuse bilateral pulmonary infiltrates and a positive sequential bronchoalveolar lavage test was revealed during bronchoscopy. Cytomegalovirus antigenemia was present in 8/200,000 white blood cells; Aspergillus galactomannan and Pneumocystis jirovecii were also present. However, only Aspergillus hyphae were found in the sputum culture. Management strategy aimed to treat underlying infections, provide adequate respiratory support, and control inflammation. We proposed that diffuse alveolar hemorrhage should be considered as differential diagnosis in early pulmonary complications after liver transplantation. Early diagnosis and aggressive treatment protocol is the key for a good outcome.

Background Hepatitis B core antibody-positive (HBcAb+) graft is known as a risk for de novo hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in recipients after liver transplantation (LT). However, little is known about the possibility or incidence of de novo HBV infections after LT in hepatitis B surface antigen-negative (HBsAg−)/HBcAb+ recipients using HBsAg−/HBcAb− grafts. The study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of de novo HBV infection in HBsAg−/HBcAb+ recipients using HBsAg−/HBcAb− grafts. A retrospective review was performed with the records of 1129 adult patients who underwent primary LT at a single institution in an HBV endemic area between January 2000 and December 2013. A total of 78 patients (6.9%) were reviewed for de novo HBV infection after LT. De novo HBV infection was developed in 1 patient (1.28%). The patient was a 65-year-old woman who underwent LT due to alcoholic liver cirrhosis. De novo HBV was not related to graft loss or death and well treated with tenofovir. In conclusion, de novo HBV infections may occur in HBsAg-/HBcAb+ recipients using HBsAg−/HBcAb− grafts, and caution is needed in these patients.

Background The need for liver retransplantation (re-LT) has been increasing. Here we describe the outcome and technical aspects of re-LT during 25 years in a single major center. Methods We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent LT from March 1988 to February 2013. Among 1,312 LTs during 25 years, 38 (2.9%) were re-LTs, including 28 adults (mean age 52.0 y) and 10 children (mean age 5.7 y). Results The most common indication was primary nonfunction in early re-LT and biliary complication in late re-LT. Preoperative major comorbidity was very common (81.6%). Among them, infection was the most frequent (52.6%). Living-donor re-LT constituted 21.1%. In operative technique, nonconventional methods were substantially performed, including high hilar dissection for hepatectomy (>50%), arterial anastomosis with the use of right gastroepiploic or jump graft (23.7%), and hepaticoenterostomy (60.5%). Several reanastomoses were needed in 10.5% for artery and 5.3% for duct. In adults and children, mean estimated blood losses were 9,541 mL and 977 mL, respectively. Mean operative times for adults and children were 508 and 432 minutes, respectively. In-hospital mortality was 35.7% in adults and 40.0% in children. The main cause of death was sepsis for both adults and children. Survival rates at 1 month and 1, 3, and 5 years were, respectively, 89.4%, 56.5%, 50.3%, and 50.3% in adults, and 70.0%, 60.0%, 60.0%, and 60.0% in children. Conclusions Outcome of re-LT is poorer than primary LT regardless of the cause of graft failure. Therefore, more technical concerns need to be considered. We also need more efforts to control perioperative infections to improve survival after re-LT.